Officer darren wilson should be what?

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.2022689


People who are mad at Grand Jury not charging Wilson with murder; did they read the facts of the case?
or are they so retarded to just react to white/vs black?

I see no reason facts that indicate this was much of a case.
It seems like Brown acted very much like a giant teen. Thinking he is
I^3
Immortal
invincible
infertile

Based on the facts, Justice has been given to Brown.
case closed

what do the people who are mad about the Grand Jury's verdict have to be mad about?
what am I missing?

If Brown was white, there would be no protesting, right?
so the reason so much protesting is the cop is white and the guy breaking the law was black.

Officer darren wilson should be what?

Left alone.

Officer darren wilson should be what?

Left alone. Originally Posted by LexusLover

agreed

As well as his family, friends, and his boss!

Darren Wilson should be offered a job. Even though he wasn't indicted it looks that his career in Ferguson is now ruined through all the publicity of this case.


Jim

Darren Wilson should be offered a job. Even though he wasn't indicted it looks that his career in Ferguson is now ruined through all the publicity of this case. Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

IMO his "career in Ferguson" is not "ruined." A "problem" is that (contrary to seemingly "popular" belief) an officer who has shot someone in the line of duty is a "risk" to another agency, primarily because of the "popular belief" that once he has shot someone it is "easier" the second time. Actually, IMO the reverse is truer and the "hesitation" in a 2nd incident by the officer is often considered a danger to his fellow officers ... meaning when confronted with another "shoot or don't shoot" decision his past bad experience and the way he feels about it may make him hesitate ... putting himself and the other offices around him in jeopardy. Depending upon his education, knowledge, and skills (as well as "trainability") he could be moved to a detective position and "off the streets" where he is less likely to have a "shoot or don't shoot' decision to make. Whatever ... he probably should not be put back on the street for a good period of time to get his head straight.

IMO his "career in Ferguson" is not "ruined." A "problem" is that (contrary to seemingly "popular" belief) an officer who has shot someone in the line of duty is a "risk" to another agency, primarily because of the "popular belief" that once he has shot someone it is "easier" the second time. Actually, IMO the reverse is truer and the "hesitation" in a 2nd incident by the officer is often considered a danger to his fellow officers ... meaning when confronted with another "shoot or don't shoot" decision his past bad experience and the way he feels about it may make him hesitate ... putting himself and the other offices around him in jeopardy. Depending upon his education, knowledge, and skills (as well as "trainability") he could be moved to a detective position and "off the streets" where he is less likely to have a "shoot or don't shoot' decision to make. Whatever ... he probably should not be put back on the street for a good period of time to get his head straight. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Oh I agree with you. I don't think his ability to function as a police officer is ruined or confidence from his peers has been tainted by any of this. It's just that this shooting has gained to much scrutiny that he would be constantly under a microscope by the community and outside groups. Maybe taking a position out of uniform and out of the publics view would be suitable for awhile. I hope something like that can be worked out. I think Wilson was basically a pretty straight up cop for the most part.

Jim

I think Wilson was basically a pretty straight up cop for the most part. Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

I think he still is. From a perception point of view he's just damaged goods.

Most people don't have a clue how one actually feels when they have taken a life one-on-one up close and personal in civilian life, and/or having had to make the decision to "shoot or don't shoot" in similar situations.

I think he still is. From a perception point of view he's just damaged goods.

Most people don't have a clue how one actually feels when they have taken a life one-on-one up close and personal in civilian life, and/or having had to make the decision to "shoot or don't shoot" in similar situations. Originally Posted by LexusLover

what about the cop who shot the 12yo, is he damaged goods?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaHJleSTQyM

Most people don't have a clue how one actually feels when they have taken a life one-on-one up close and personal in civilian life, and/or having had to make the decision to "shoot or don't shoot" in similar situations. Originally Posted by LexusLover

True.

It is also true most white people do not know what it feels like growing up harassed by police that are of a different race.

...Actually, IMO the reverse is truer and the "hesitation" in a 2nd incident by the officer is often considered a danger to his fellow officers ... meaning when confronted with another "shoot or don't shoot" decision his past bad experience and the way he feels about it may make him hesitate ... putting himself and the other offices around him in jeopardy. ... he probably should not be put back on the street for a good period of time to get his head straight. Originally Posted by LexusLover

And the pastry shop paid for psyche counseling is strongly recommended, and in some places mandatory. And, weapons range folks are sometimes able to see that hesitation during practice (stress environment). Thus, a weapons recertification is almost always required.

what about the cop who shot the 12yo, is he damaged goods? Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

Contrasted with the Ferguson badge, that will be a much "deeper" psyche issue to deal with, as it turned out to be a preteen.

True.

It is also true most white people do not know what it feels like growing up harassed by police that are of a different race.


Originally Posted by WTF

better to be "harassed" by a different race or ones own?

plus, if you are breaking the law and get "harassed", does it really bother you or do you know you deserve it?

Since Wilson/Brown incident minutes after he stole cigars, this was likely why he acted how he did...instead of just doing what the cop asked.
do what cops say, they carry guns..

I think he still is. From a perception point of view he's just damaged goods.

Most people don't have a clue how one actually feels when they have taken a life one-on-one up close and personal in civilian life, and/or having had to make the decision to "shoot or don't shoot" in similar situations. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Damaged Goods. I guess that's a good way to put it. People don't realize Cops patrol around town looking for trouble. The sole purpose of a patrol division in any police dept be it big or small is to detect crime in progress, from minor traffic infractions to major felonies. Unlike civilians Police Officers don't have the luxury of retreating when confronted with a suspect who is violent or uncooperative. Wilson's initial purpose in contacting Michael Brown and his friend was to inform them not to walk in the middle of the road. We all know how quickly that interaction escalated into something Wilson certainly didn't expect. Then to add insult to injury Michael Brown's mother says on national news that Wilson's court testimony sounded crazy and she states that Wilson was out to kill somebody that day. We have this women going around saying this vile crap about a police officer that she doesn't know. Painting a picture of Wilson as some rouge cop out to find opportunities to kill citizens. Iam sure from her statement many people believe that.

Jim

I think he should continue to serve in Ferguson if he wishes to. Of course, that's a no win for him. So maybe he ought to find another place to live. Maybe where there are no thugs.

Sucks for him, but that's the reality of the matter. He's no George Zimmerman, after all.

better to be "harassed" by a different race or ones own?
. Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

Kinda hard to play the race card against your own race...

plus, if you are breaking the law and get "harassed", does it really bother you or do you know you deserve it?

.. Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

If your perception of the law harassing one race and not the other....well then yea it matters.

Since Wilson/Brown incident minutes after he stole cigars, this was likely why he acted how he did...instead of just doing what the cop asked.
do what cops say, they carry guns.. Originally Posted by bigcockpussylicker

I understand that.

All I have said from the start is that these are the type of troubles you have when the racial make-up of the police force is so out of line with the make-up of the citizens it patrols.

It is no different in Iraq when you had Shiites policing Sunnis in Iraq. You wind up with ISIS.