Is the fact that p411 is operated via canada vs date check being ran in the U.S. a small reason of liability for anybody. I know its probably a false sense of security anyway, but if their was legislation passed to control verification sights in the U.S. or another means of info gathering wouldnt it be beyond difficult for authorities to gain info from p411, versus an easier transition to datecheck if they got compromised?
...
Originally Posted by gimme_that
I think this is a good point, but personally if you have provider references, there's not much info given up (at least on DC) - so I'm not sure what info they'd really get on a "client" other than perhaps an IP address and who provided the verification. Now if employment verification, etc., was given, that'd be a major concern.
...
P411 seems to have more of a count of ladies in this area.....but that may be exaggerated because the agencies have individual profiles for each lady on their agency which may distort the count.
I personally choose to use p411 over datecheck because every providers webpage I saw mostly had it as a verification option. I rarely see datecheck as a providers main option at least here locally.
Originally Posted by gimme_that
I looked at the issue of what NOLA girls were on both. My impression was that the NOLA girls who are on multiple boards were on both services, maybe even less so on P411. There certainly were more girls pulled up when searching on P411 for New Orleans, but there were quite a few NOLA girls on P411 that I would be skeptical to contact as I've seen nothing on them on Escorts.com nor here, and for that matter nothing on Eros or BP. In fact, this was similar when I looked at Pittsburgh - some of the one's listed for Pittsburgh on P411, I hadn't a clue who they were.
Well, thanks to all who have offered opinions ... seems like the consensus so far is P411 for NOLA.