Boardman is quite correct.
The inherent time lag is simply not understood.
My group noted the PPI on selected items 3Q20 and we saved a few client's wallets.
Although the Keynesian model is one of the best around, the updated version that considers perpetual, does not consider the issue of politicians ignoring relevant data, and then at a later date (as in to late) meddling incorrectly (and expecting instant results) which will always make situations 2 or 3 times worse that what it could have been. And, we end up with what we have today, with the pendulum swinging to far to the wrong end.
Basically, politicians can't hit a barn wall with a Jart.
In that all economic theories are fundamentally based on the economy as a whole, politicians jacking with just a small handful of items will, of course, always jack up everything else regardless.
My biggest humor item is that Yellen, supposedly a career economist, went full politician several years ago.
To close, wall street has better economists than the fed. And those guys will protect their clients, and let the fed strategy room leak data they can take advantage of.
Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter
great post UC!
lets get one bit of financial fairy dust out of the way before i advocate for anything. supply siders have this theory-footnote, they've never been right well pretty much ever and happy to view any data to the contrary that anyone can dig up-that if you reduce tax rates across the board, but especially on corporations and the rich, that that extra revenue in the pockets of corporations and the rich will be used in such a way to cause great economic activity that even at the lower marginal tax rates, the total tax revenue will increase. well believing that, based on the historical evidence of what actually happens when marginal tax rates on corporations and the rich are reduced, is the same as thinking that fairy dust will help us pay off our national debt and change our trade deficits to trade surplusses. so if that's not the answer, then what is?
i contend that keynesian policies are the correct course of action during dire economic straits, such as the Great Depression, the Great Recession, and the Covid-19 Clusterfuck. (can we add that last term to the financial lexicon?) and i believe the economic data supports that conclusion. (also, i believe you said that you don't object to keynesian financial policies, just to their overuse, which i think is 100% correct.)
but what do financially smart people-and for that matter, companies and countries-do when the good times roll? do they max out all their credit cards? do they borrow every nickel they can from their local bank branch which their income says they're qualified for?
nope. what they do is they pay off their debts, all the way to zero. and if they're really smart, they will ask those same lenders for credit limit increases. and max out their credit limits, not their credit card balances.
the last president to run a balanced budget, and then start to pay off the debt, was clinton. then bush came to power, passed huge tax cuts, and started two wars that he put on Uncle Sam's credit card, the second of which was fully elective and entirely idiotic, which i expressed to my law school peers at the time, most of whom, as Republicans, supported Gulf War II.
the first war-afghanistan-i made the mistake of supporting, but with the caveat that it be paid for. the second i called out as idiotic and said should be led by bush on the front lines in a tank, and be fully paid for by the idiots who supported the war. turned out it was all a basket case, as i predicted, and i advocated that bush, cheney, rummy and wolfowitz should be tried as war criminals, supporting torture and so on, in violation of the Law of War as laid out in the Geneva Conventions.
Obama inherited a trainwreck from bush, but by doing everything right, he got us out of the Great Recession and also got deficits lower and lower each year, way lower when inflation-adjusted than bush 43 and ronald reagan. i maintain that deficits should be 0 almost all of the time, but obama did a yeoman's job getting the us out of the great recession, and by his last year, deficits adjusted for inflation had never been lower since the clinton years.
trump comes in during booming economic times left by obama. what does he do? instead of reducing the deficit to 0 and beginning to pay down the debt, he passes a huge tax cut that literally blew a hole in the federal budget. total and complete lunacy.
then covid, which served as a quick and searing reminder that competence matters. Course then our deficits went through the roof, as trump correctly chose keynesian policies.
verdict still out on biden, but i predict his inflation-adjusted deficits will be nowhere near as disastrously awful as trump's.
i hate to end on a political note, but since the facts support it, here we go. Republicans talk a big game on fiscal discipline, but the only time they take that seriously is when a Dem is in the White House, when they declare the failure of the Dem president to run a balanced budget with zero deficits to be a henious example of the failure of democratic policy, and any expansion of the social safety net to be "too expensive", and "unaffordable." when a republican is in office and proposes a huge tax cut, sudddenly they could give zero fucks about deficit spending and the size of the federal debt.
mcconnell is no patriot, just a power hungry weasel who cares nothing about the country he supposedly serves. he's a disciple of machievelli, and nothing more. like trump, he's happy to throw america under the bus when it is politically expedient. instead of saying, "what can i collaborate on with obama on to make america a better place?" (including say weakening China), he said, "what can i do to assure that obama is a one-term president?" (that's why i am thoroughly amused with trump's decimation of mcconnell on social media.)