https://www.newsweek.com/ftw-pac-swi...-trump-1968682
Larry Flynt would be so pissed right now
talk about taking away liberties- without the consent of the public.Only a matter of (2 weeks) time. This shit ends on November 5. America can't wait to vote this fucking loser movement into oblivion.
These RED Hats need to be voted the fuck out. Originally Posted by eyecu2
Except it’s not coming from him. You guys and your bogeymen crack me up.Or Johnny giving an upper-decker to a well deserved reward to a fellow student who's been a jackass in general. But they would never know about that type of laughter or numbskullery if all things R or X rated were taken off line.
Then again, this isn’t a bad idea. Filters should be device level and auto reporting. (Staff edit) Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Or Johnny giving an upper-decker to a well deserved reward to a fellow student who's been a jackass in general. But they would never know about that type of laughter or numbskullery if all things R or X rated were taken off line. Originally Posted by eyecu2I honestly have no idea what that means.
Imagine a world where things like Animal House is outlawed, and so is Alien, -due to Sigourney shows' a tuft of cooter hair. Or the infamous Porkys' series and the identification of a perpetrator via a mole. It's ridiculous to me that censorship vs a viewer warning is more important. Parents can be parents. Nothing more is needed.Those movies have ratings. Until recently you couldn’t see them, unedited, without meeting certain requirements. This was good while it lasted, but is now something left to the household. You’d hope they’d be responsible, unfortunately not all will.
That said- if the porn offends someone- why don't we leave that to the parents to monitor- vs. another government agency or a oversight of the same???Congress write laws all the time, there’s no reason to think they couldn’t pass something that requires equipment manufacturers to implement appropriate device level restrictions. ~Device level is key here~ Determinations can’t be left to the sites themselves. Discouraging traffic, of ANY kind, is clearly not in their best financial interest. The industry will fight it tooth and nail. It’s a fight worth having, imo.
When did we need to ensure that we protect (Staff edit)who look at Dad's porn stash under his side of the bed, or will Fathers face prison too for looking at some bodacious titties- and letting a (Staff edit) by not locking them up in a safe? - and while we are at it- (Staff edit)-nursing need to be sheltered by a barrier of mom's fun bags vs. allowing what happens in the home to stay in the home?Never. A responsible dad should secure his shit. Unfortunately that hardly ever happens but is no reason to throw away the rule book.
Where do we draw the line- or does it need to be a self- governed thing?The same place its always been.
I don’t have any sympathy for middle aged men who still need porn. Grow up. Originally Posted by bambinoThe irony is rich here; while your at it, why not include any sexual gratification regardless of it's source. Hence a hooker board, and things that happen, or depictions of what happened while visiting a hooker?