Attempts to suppress honesty on this board: Providers who get NO reviews and then lash out at the reviewer

It has happened many times. A member writes a NO review and then the provider lashes out, making reactionary accusations against the reviewer. And now I have experienced this reaction. I wrote an honest review, and two hours later she attempted to trash me here in the co-ed forum.

There are women who give excellent service. There are women who truly want their clients to be satisfied. Praise to you, if that is your M.O. Thank you!

And those providers who receive a NO review can choose to use it as a learning tool. What good provider wouldn't want to see how they could do better? NO reviews also helps us guys make better decisions; decisions we are less inclined to regret.

But what about the motivation of the girls who lash out after receiving a NO review?

Some girls attempt to suppress honesty.

Some girls lash out hoping to silence us.

Some girls really just want to continue their bad behavior unabated.

Thank goodness this represents only a small portion of the ladies on ECCIE. Most are wonderful.

If this forum is to be a useful tool, we must be honest. If we are not, trust declines and overall service can decline as well.

Praise to the good providers on ECCIE. They are the reason we are here. But without honest reviews, people would not know the difference between good providers and those who are falling short of reasonable expectations.

Capt, I agree 100% and that has been an issue here for many years. Honesty in reviews should always be the main concentration.

I agree there are many ladies here that are top notch and there are a few that are not.

Anyways, let's all have a Happy Valentine's Day

Responding to a ladies response to a no review is the male version of a provider responding to a no review. Your review stands on its own and you should not feel like you need to defend it, your just playing into the drama these ladies seek from such a review.



IB

Responding to a ladies response to a no review is the male version of a provider responding to a no review. Your review stands on its own and you should not feel like you need to defend it, your just playing into the drama these ladies seek from such a review. Originally Posted by Iron Butterfly

He is a long standing member with a lot of reviews credit to his name. As such, the vast majority of men will consider the negative experience he described as an accurate portrayal of her services.

Left at that, it would have affected the whore to some degree but others would see her record and convince themselves it was a chemistry thing and see her themselves. Maybe it was a 1 time thing.. Maybe the start of something. Time will tell.

In her rebuttal she shows a side of herself prone to drama and attacks on a guys character if he chooses to speak his mind and THAT will affect her business far more.

I tend to agree that CC comes off as a wuss in his whining rebuttal to her rebuttal. His review history was enough. The vast majority of guys here choose to heed other guys reports if they have a credible history....

This thread only portrays him as being as drama prone as the whore all butt hurt over a session he should have walked away from the session

poor baby got lip from a whore that took his money and left him all butt hurt.....

Cap didn't attack said provider directly. He posted this as a generalization which is true across any part of Eccie.

Cap, just hobby on brother.

I consider a girl lashing out at a no review (and not a bogus review, it's usually very easy to tell) a self report. It's really a damn shame because if the girl really were good and it weren't a chemistry thing... well there's been more than one provider I've refused to see after acting like this, or have cut off due to bad behavior. And I tend to keep seeing the same provider over and over. To put it in terms every provider should understand: No matter how much a no may hurt your pride lashing out will cost you thousands.

Hell counting the amount I've given to individual providers alone that's thousands of dollars over the course of a year.

Her response insulted him, called him names, etc. without rebutting any of his claims.

His review simply told what he felt happened without any of that.

I certainly know which one I would probably believe.

Capt, you are consistently one the best members for honesty. If you say I believe it. You also keep your word on pm privacy. Glad to have you as a member.

Cap spoke his mind on the review, wish more guys would do that. From what I know about him he is a truthful and credible person.

Been there, done that. Some guys won't write a no review because they think ROS says it all...but still write a yes. Some just share info in coed or ML as a meh review....I for one am not afraid to write a no review if actually needed. Last time I wrote a no review, my account was trying to get hacked before it got locked down within 48 hours of the no review.

He is a long standing member with a lot of reviews credit to his name. As such, the vast majority of men will consider the negative experience he described as an accurate portrayal of her services.

Left at that, it would have affected the whore to some degree but others would see her record and convince themselves it was a chemistry thing and see her themselves. Maybe it was a 1 time thing.. Maybe the start of something. Time will tell.

In her rebuttal she shows a side of herself prone to drama and attacks on a guys character if he chooses to speak his mind and THAT will affect her business far more.

I tend to agree that CC comes off as a wuss in his whining rebuttal to her rebuttal. His review history was enough. The vast majority of guys here choose to heed other guys reports if they have a credible history....

This thread only portrays him as being as drama prone as the whore all butt hurt over a session he should have walked away from the session

poor baby got lip from a whore that took his money and left him all butt hurt.....

Originally Posted by Whispers

Wuss?? Poor Baby??? Gee this coming from the king of smear campaigns anytime a provider disagrees or talks shit to him on the board. If said provider had did the same to you, you sir would have latched on to her an never let up. Do not act like you wouldn't, because that is what you are known for.

Cap'n had every right to post this thread and don't blame him one damn bit. A provider couldn't handle someone speaking the truth about her so she proceeded to start shit with him. Now most (emphasis MOST) providers would have just shrugged the review off and moved on. However there are a few providers on here who cannot handle a person speaking the truth about them, they sure as fuck do love the money, but are too stupid & weak to handle ALL that comes with it.

Post on Cap'n, you didn't do shit wrong. At least not in this case...

Weak argument. Point goes to the fat man.

Weak argument. Point goes to the fat man. Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

LOL, name calling only shows who the true weak ones are. Nice try though. Do yourself a favor and stay in San Antonio where you belong.

LOL, name calling only shows who the true weak ones are ... Originally Posted by Little Monster

I was not name calling. Are you?

I was not name calling. Are you? Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

So calling someone "Fat Man" isn't name calling?? Keep trying.
You say my argument was weak, cool. You are entitled to your opinion as wrong, worthless, and irrelevant as it may be. But you could at least try to back your mouth up and elaborate. Anyone can throw pathetic comments out like that but without any explanation as to why that is all it is. Pathetic.

Are you seriously saying Whispers would not have responded in the same manner if not worse? Are you saying that Cap'n should not have stuck up for himself after a provider tried to bash him for posting a review of his own experience? Work with me here, help me make my arguments stronger in the eyes of the almighty Johnny Yanks....LMAFAO!!!