Looks like a record turnout may be in store this cycle for all voters. Upwards to 65%, That is good for both parties.
- WTF
- 02-19-2020, 12:43 PM
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/electi...z&ocid=U221DHP
Looks like a record turnout may be in store this cycle for all voters. Upwards to 65%, That is good for both parties.
Looks like a record turnout may be in store this cycle for all voters. Upwards to 65%, That is good for both parties.
- oeb11
- 02-19-2020, 01:48 PM
The Fascist DPST's are celebrating turning red to blue - and taking over the house, Senate, and PoTUS to rule forever and ever after.
Looks like the election is already over - in favor of the Fascist DPST's - so - why should the blues bother to show up from their other activities - like staying home on welfare watching Oprah???
Just stay home and all will be well - according to the LSM!!!
No need to bother oneself with voting blue - it is already covered.
Sounds good to me.
Thank you - fascist DPST poster.
Looks like the election is already over - in favor of the Fascist DPST's - so - why should the blues bother to show up from their other activities - like staying home on welfare watching Oprah???
Just stay home and all will be well - according to the LSM!!!
No need to bother oneself with voting blue - it is already covered.
Sounds good to me.
Thank you - fascist DPST poster.
- friendly fred
- 02-19-2020, 03:06 PM
The Fascist DPST's are celebrating turning red to blue - and taking over the house, Senate, and PoTUS to rule forever and ever after.I hope they (the leftist DPST's) think they have it won and they stay home so Trump can have another 4 years.
Looks like the election is already over - in favor of the Fascist DPST's - so - why should the blues bother to show up from their other activities - like staying home on welfare watching Oprah???
Just stay home and all will be well - according to the LSM!!!
No need to bother oneself with voting blue - it is already covered.
Sounds good to me.
Thank you - fascist DPST poster. Originally Posted by oeb11
- WTF
- 02-19-2020, 03:11 PM
I hope they (the leftist DPST's) think they have it won and they stay home so Trump can have another 4 years. Originally Posted by friendly fredYou are not that stupid....the party out of power don't stay home.
I do think many will stay at home if Bernie gets the nomination.
Bloomberg though has the money to get them out to vote.
Funny thing is...Obama got elected with 8% unemployment. Could Trump get reelected if it went to 5%?
- Levianon17
- 02-19-2020, 03:24 PM
Hahahaha, This is a joke, right?
- WTF
- 02-19-2020, 03:47 PM
- The_Waco_Kid
- 02-19-2020, 04:20 PM
You are not that stupid....the party out of power don't stay home.
I do think many will stay at home if Bernie gets the nomination.
Bloomberg though has the money to get them out to vote.
Funny thing is...Obama got elected with 8% unemployment. Could Trump get reelected if it went to 5%?
Originally Posted by WTF
so he's gonna have black jesus hand out free beer to the homeless to get them to vote?
you can't mean that Captain!
BAHHAHAAAAA
- oeb11
- 02-19-2020, 04:31 PM
ftw does mean it.
With Sanders the nominee - a large percentage of the "moderate" Fascist DPST voters will simply stay home rather than vote for Trump or Bernie.
I am voting Bernie in the DPST primary!!!
With Sanders the nominee - a large percentage of the "moderate" Fascist DPST voters will simply stay home rather than vote for Trump or Bernie.
I am voting Bernie in the DPST primary!!!
- HoeHummer
- 02-19-2020, 05:24 PM
Sounds like the Trumpholians are goings to the storm cellars.
- The_Waco_Kid
- 02-19-2020, 05:35 PM
- Her Peas
- 02-19-2020, 08:58 PM
More democrats=more crime, more debt, urban blight.
- Levianon17
- 02-19-2020, 11:01 PM
- The_Waco_Kid
- 02-20-2020, 12:07 AM
let's look at the full text of FTW=WTF's post and show that it doesn't indicate a blue wave like he would think it does.
NEW YORK — As Republican President Donald Trump seeks a second term in November, Americans' interest in voting is growing faster in large cities dominated by Democrats than in conservative rural areas, according to an analysis of Reuters/Ipsos national opinion polls.
If the trend lasts until Election Day on Nov. 3, it would be a reversal from the 2016 election when rural turnout outpaced voting in urban areas, helping Trump narrowly win the White House.
The finding, based on responses from more than 88,000 U.S. adults who took the online poll from August to December 2015 or from August to December 2019, suggests that the “Blue Wave,” a swell of anti-Trump activism that followed his entry into the White House in 2017, is still rolling across the country's largest population centers.
Even as Trump commands rock-solid support among Republicans, voters' interest in going to the polls appears to be growing faster among those who disapprove of Trump than among those who approve of him, according to experts who reviewed the data.
The advantage in urban political engagement extends deep into the most competitive battleground states that Trump won by razor-thin margins four years ago, the data shows.
In large urban areas of the upper Midwest, a region that includes swing states Michigan and Wisconsin, for example, the number of people who said they were “certain” to vote in the upcoming presidential election rose by 10 percentage points to 67% compared with survey responses from 2015.
In smaller upper Midwest communities, the number of people similarly dedicated to voting rose by only about 1 point to 60% in that same four-year period.
Overall, the number of “certain” voters rose by 7 percentage points nationally from 2015 to 2019. It increased by more than that in the largest metropolitan areas, rising by 9 points in communities with between 1 million and 5 million people and 8 points in metros with at least 5 million people.
Smaller and rural communities lagged behind. The number of “certain” voters rose by 5 points in sparsely populated, Republican-dominated “non-metro” areas.
MOMENTUM ON BOTH SIDES?
The rise in urban political engagement helped Democrats win political victories last year, including governor’s races in conservative-leaning Kentucky and Louisiana.
It may have also contributed to elevated voting levels in some of the more heavily populated communities and college towns in Iowa and New Hampshire, which held their presidential nominating contests earlier this month.
“Democrats are very angry,” said Nicholas Valentino, a political scientist at the University of Michigan, who reviewed some of the poll findings for Reuters.
“Many see this administration as an existential threat to the constitutional order. They’re standing ready to participate to try to change the course of this country.”
To be sure, a lot can happen this year to change the public’s interest in voting.
“Republicans are fired up as well" after the Democratic-led House of Representatives tried to remove Trump through impeachment, said Bryon Allen, chief research officer at WPA Intelligence, a conservative political consulting firm that works with dozens of Republican congressional candidates.
In last week's New Hampshire Republican primary, 151,011 people showed up to support Trump even though he had no significant competition, a turnout that easily surpassed the number who participated in previous primaries when former Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton sought re-election.
“Democrats can’t just assume that if they drive up turnout in the suburbs that they’ll win,” said Joe Lenski, co-founder of exit polling firm Edison Research. “Trump can drive up turnout in small towns and rural areas to counteract that.”
'JUST WANT TO BEAT TRUMP'
While voting has been higher this year in Democratic presidential nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire, experts say at least some of that is due to population growth.
Michael McDonald, a University of Florida political scientist who studies voter turnout, said a lot of Democrats also may be sitting out the primaries “because they don’t see a lot of distinction between these candidates.”
When Trump gets on the ballot in November, McDonald said: “There will be much sharper interest in voting.”
By Election Day, McDonald expects as many as two-thirds of the voting-age population may cast ballots, a record level of participation for a U.S. presidential election.
That would be up from 60.1% turnout among eligible voters in 2016, and it would surpass a generational high point of 63.8% turnout recorded in 1960, according to McDonald’s U.S. Elections Project.
Mary Lou Seamon, 67, of Knoxville, Tennessee, will be one of millions who expect to take part after sitting out the last election. The retired social services worker said none of the candidates, especially Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, excited her four years ago.
Seamon admired Trump, at least initially, for his experience as a businessman. But her opinions soured once Trump took office and she became determined to vote him out around the time Trump attacked former Senator John McCain after the death of the former war hero in 2018.
On Election Day, Seamon will vote for any Democrat, no matter who wins the nomination.
“I just want to beat Trump.”
MEASURING THE WAVE
The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which is conducted online and administered throughout the United States, started asking American adults in 2012 to rate their overall level of interest in voting in upcoming general elections.
Poll respondents were asked to rate their level of engagement on a scale of one to 10, with one meaning they were certain not to vote and 10 meaning they were certain to participate.
It gathered 53,394 responses in the last five months of 2015 and 35,271 responses in the same part of 2019.
Using the zip codes provided by the respondents, Ipsos split the survey by the population size of the community that people lived in. Both regionally and nationally, the analysis showed, political engagement increased the most from 2015 to 2019 in large urban areas and the least in non-metropolitan areas.
It was the same when grouping just those states where the margin of victory is expected be closest this year.
In a “battleground” region that included Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona and Colorado, the number of “certain” voters rose by 9 percentage points in large metropolitan areas that have a population of at least 5 million, and 8 points in areas with 1 to 5 million, while it rose by 4 points in smaller, non-metros.
Results for battleground states
Results for Upper-Midwest states
Among those living in the Upper Midwest, a region that includes Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin, the poll found a jump in political engagement in some of the same urban areas where Democrats fell short in 2016.
Altogether, 67% of people living in metro areas of at least 1 million people rated themselves as a “10” or “certain to vote” in the 2019 poll. That is up by about 10 percentage points from 2015.
In comparison, 63% of those who lived in smaller communities of less than 1 million rated themselves as similarly certain to vote, which is up 2 points from 2015.
Trump won Michigan and Wisconsin by less than 40,000 votes combined, in part because of depressed turnout in Wayne County, Michigan, and Milwaukee, the largest city in Wisconsin.
Southeastern states
In the Southeast, voter engagement is surging in large metros like Miami-Dade in South Florida and Atlanta, where Democrats outnumber Republicans by double-digit margins.
In 2019, about 60% said they were certain to vote in the presidential election, up 8 points from 2015. In metros with less than 1 million people, 64% said they were certain to vote, up by 7 points. In smaller non-metropolitan areas, the number of people who were locked in on voting rose by 6 points from 2015 to 60%.
Southwestern states:
The poll found that 65% of residents in the Phoenix, Denver, Salt Lake City and other big Southwestern metro areas planned to vote in the upcoming election. That is up by 9 percentage points from 2015. Political engagement rose by nearly the same amount — 8 points — in smaller metros, but it was unchanged in rural areas of the Southwest.
The presidential race may be especially competitive this year in Arizona and Colorado. Trump is expected to win Utah, and New Mexico is considered a reliably safe state for Democrats.
(Reporting by Chris Kahn; editing by Soyoung Kim and Peter Cooney)
NEW YORK — As Republican President Donald Trump seeks a second term in November, Americans' interest in voting is growing faster in large cities dominated by Democrats than in conservative rural areas, according to an analysis of Reuters/Ipsos national opinion polls.
If the trend lasts until Election Day on Nov. 3, it would be a reversal from the 2016 election when rural turnout outpaced voting in urban areas, helping Trump narrowly win the White House.
The finding, based on responses from more than 88,000 U.S. adults who took the online poll from August to December 2015 or from August to December 2019, suggests that the “Blue Wave,” a swell of anti-Trump activism that followed his entry into the White House in 2017, is still rolling across the country's largest population centers.
Even as Trump commands rock-solid support among Republicans, voters' interest in going to the polls appears to be growing faster among those who disapprove of Trump than among those who approve of him, according to experts who reviewed the data.
The advantage in urban political engagement extends deep into the most competitive battleground states that Trump won by razor-thin margins four years ago, the data shows.
In large urban areas of the upper Midwest, a region that includes swing states Michigan and Wisconsin, for example, the number of people who said they were “certain” to vote in the upcoming presidential election rose by 10 percentage points to 67% compared with survey responses from 2015.
In smaller upper Midwest communities, the number of people similarly dedicated to voting rose by only about 1 point to 60% in that same four-year period.
Overall, the number of “certain” voters rose by 7 percentage points nationally from 2015 to 2019. It increased by more than that in the largest metropolitan areas, rising by 9 points in communities with between 1 million and 5 million people and 8 points in metros with at least 5 million people.
Smaller and rural communities lagged behind. The number of “certain” voters rose by 5 points in sparsely populated, Republican-dominated “non-metro” areas.
MOMENTUM ON BOTH SIDES?
The rise in urban political engagement helped Democrats win political victories last year, including governor’s races in conservative-leaning Kentucky and Louisiana.
It may have also contributed to elevated voting levels in some of the more heavily populated communities and college towns in Iowa and New Hampshire, which held their presidential nominating contests earlier this month.
“Democrats are very angry,” said Nicholas Valentino, a political scientist at the University of Michigan, who reviewed some of the poll findings for Reuters.
“Many see this administration as an existential threat to the constitutional order. They’re standing ready to participate to try to change the course of this country.”
To be sure, a lot can happen this year to change the public’s interest in voting.
“Republicans are fired up as well" after the Democratic-led House of Representatives tried to remove Trump through impeachment, said Bryon Allen, chief research officer at WPA Intelligence, a conservative political consulting firm that works with dozens of Republican congressional candidates.
In last week's New Hampshire Republican primary, 151,011 people showed up to support Trump even though he had no significant competition, a turnout that easily surpassed the number who participated in previous primaries when former Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton sought re-election.
“Democrats can’t just assume that if they drive up turnout in the suburbs that they’ll win,” said Joe Lenski, co-founder of exit polling firm Edison Research. “Trump can drive up turnout in small towns and rural areas to counteract that.”
'JUST WANT TO BEAT TRUMP'
While voting has been higher this year in Democratic presidential nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire, experts say at least some of that is due to population growth.
Michael McDonald, a University of Florida political scientist who studies voter turnout, said a lot of Democrats also may be sitting out the primaries “because they don’t see a lot of distinction between these candidates.”
When Trump gets on the ballot in November, McDonald said: “There will be much sharper interest in voting.”
By Election Day, McDonald expects as many as two-thirds of the voting-age population may cast ballots, a record level of participation for a U.S. presidential election.
That would be up from 60.1% turnout among eligible voters in 2016, and it would surpass a generational high point of 63.8% turnout recorded in 1960, according to McDonald’s U.S. Elections Project.
Mary Lou Seamon, 67, of Knoxville, Tennessee, will be one of millions who expect to take part after sitting out the last election. The retired social services worker said none of the candidates, especially Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, excited her four years ago.
Seamon admired Trump, at least initially, for his experience as a businessman. But her opinions soured once Trump took office and she became determined to vote him out around the time Trump attacked former Senator John McCain after the death of the former war hero in 2018.
On Election Day, Seamon will vote for any Democrat, no matter who wins the nomination.
“I just want to beat Trump.”
MEASURING THE WAVE
The Reuters/Ipsos poll, which is conducted online and administered throughout the United States, started asking American adults in 2012 to rate their overall level of interest in voting in upcoming general elections.
Poll respondents were asked to rate their level of engagement on a scale of one to 10, with one meaning they were certain not to vote and 10 meaning they were certain to participate.
It gathered 53,394 responses in the last five months of 2015 and 35,271 responses in the same part of 2019.
Using the zip codes provided by the respondents, Ipsos split the survey by the population size of the community that people lived in. Both regionally and nationally, the analysis showed, political engagement increased the most from 2015 to 2019 in large urban areas and the least in non-metropolitan areas.
It was the same when grouping just those states where the margin of victory is expected be closest this year.
In a “battleground” region that included Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona and Colorado, the number of “certain” voters rose by 9 percentage points in large metropolitan areas that have a population of at least 5 million, and 8 points in areas with 1 to 5 million, while it rose by 4 points in smaller, non-metros.
Results for battleground states
Results for Upper-Midwest states
Among those living in the Upper Midwest, a region that includes Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio and Wisconsin, the poll found a jump in political engagement in some of the same urban areas where Democrats fell short in 2016.
Altogether, 67% of people living in metro areas of at least 1 million people rated themselves as a “10” or “certain to vote” in the 2019 poll. That is up by about 10 percentage points from 2015.
In comparison, 63% of those who lived in smaller communities of less than 1 million rated themselves as similarly certain to vote, which is up 2 points from 2015.
Trump won Michigan and Wisconsin by less than 40,000 votes combined, in part because of depressed turnout in Wayne County, Michigan, and Milwaukee, the largest city in Wisconsin.
Southeastern states
In the Southeast, voter engagement is surging in large metros like Miami-Dade in South Florida and Atlanta, where Democrats outnumber Republicans by double-digit margins.
In 2019, about 60% said they were certain to vote in the presidential election, up 8 points from 2015. In metros with less than 1 million people, 64% said they were certain to vote, up by 7 points. In smaller non-metropolitan areas, the number of people who were locked in on voting rose by 6 points from 2015 to 60%.
Southwestern states:
The poll found that 65% of residents in the Phoenix, Denver, Salt Lake City and other big Southwestern metro areas planned to vote in the upcoming election. That is up by 9 percentage points from 2015. Political engagement rose by nearly the same amount — 8 points — in smaller metros, but it was unchanged in rural areas of the Southwest.
The presidential race may be especially competitive this year in Arizona and Colorado. Trump is expected to win Utah, and New Mexico is considered a reliably safe state for Democrats.
(Reporting by Chris Kahn; editing by Soyoung Kim and Peter Cooney)
- gfejunkie
- 02-20-2020, 05:00 AM
Sounds more like wishful thinking to me. Just like 2016.
Please do keep believing those polls though. Just like 2016.
Please do keep believing those polls though. Just like 2016.
- rexdutchman
- 02-20-2020, 08:19 AM
yea okay,,,,