How Do "No" Reviews Affect Your Decision Making?

"No" reviews happen. Some providers shrug them off, some take them pretty hard. I personally don't let a "no" review here or there stop me from seeing someone. Hell, one of my favorites has a "no" but it certainly isn't reflective of my experiences with her. Conversely I've had encounters here or there with providers others rave about that I didn't really care for. It happens.

Much depends on what's in the ROS for me. If the "no" is because of say, safety or hygiene issues, that will keep me away. But if it's just apparent that the client and provider didn't have chemistry together, no big deal - unless it's a repeating pattern of "no" reviews from multiple clients for similar reasons.

What do you think?

While it's obviously a client poll, providers are welcome to comment.

I'd agree that a single "No" review doesn't mean much if it's clear from the ROS that it was just a case of no mutual chemistry or unrealistic expectations on the part of the client. I look for patterns of problems, and one or two scattered "No" reviews does not constitute a pattern.

I have had a few encounters that I considered No on them. But I didn't review them because they provided what was expected, it was just a case of not being up to what I truly enjoyed. Others all seemed to enjoy them, so I chalk it up to a preference thing. So if the ROS explains the reason for a no, usually would take more than 1 no to sway me.

Unless it was given by SpankyJ because she didn't allow you a foot job or the SpankyJ trifecta positions...that shit won't fly round here.

I have had a few encounters that I considered No on them. But I didn't review them because they provided what was expected, it was just a case of not being up to what I truly enjoyed. Others all seemed to enjoy them, so I chalk it up to a preference thing. So if the ROS explains the reason for a no, usually would take more than 1 no to sway me.

Unless it was given by SpankyJ because she didn't allow you a foot job or the SpankyJ trifecta positions...that shit won't fly round here. Originally Posted by BK

Lol, true ha ha.

I too have refrained from giving a bad review or two because in my estimation it was just a mutual lack of chemistry and no real fault of the lady's. In that case I just don't do a review.

If I see a no in at the end of the ros I contact the provider to get her side of why. sometimes the client is just as much at fault. who know maybe she just wasn't what he really wanted or heck the client could be the jerk of all jerks so contact the provider is a safe thing to do then make your choice to see her or no.

Since I do not have premium access I just look at their showcase page. If there are 2or more no's per 10 I look at the comments of the no. If multiple no's are similar I pass.

Since I do not have premium access I just look at their showcase page. If there are 2or more no's per 10 I look at the comments of the no. If multiple no's are similar I pass. Originally Posted by RyanFromTER

That's probably a good way to do it without premium. Although premium gets you something else, the ability to see reviews that appear to be Yes but are actually No when you read the ROS...maybe not always stated as such but sometimes implied.

If I see a no in at the end of the ros I contact the provider to get her side of why. sometimes the client is just as much at fault. who know maybe she just wasn't what he really wanted or heck the client could be the jerk of all jerks so contact the provider is a safe thing to do then make your choice to see her or no. Originally Posted by dwl318

Yes, I've heard many "other side of the story" tales. It's not always the provider's fault if she gets a no.

If I see a no in at the end of the ros I contact the provider to get her side of why. sometimes the client is just as much at fault. who know maybe she just wasn't what he really wanted or heck the client could be the jerk of all jerks so contact the provider is a safe thing to do then make your choice to see her or no. Originally Posted by dwl318

I'm sure the providers really appreciate the fact that you give them a chance to explain their side of things!

No need to contact the provider if she does enough encouragement to her minions
To obfuscate and diffuse the situation.

Personally, I try to do my homework. When I see the no review it does trigger me to look deeper than a single review. I look at who wrote the review and research their other reviews especially if they have reviewed a lady I've met. Some ROS. Is valuable because some expectations are not realistic. A NO definitely sparks more research for me but doesn't limit me.

A no on here means no for me.
One No at $300 = 14 hours of work at $25 an hour (I have to pay taxes on that money).
I do read ROS but a no is a huge red flag.
I shop this site because in general I am not a gambling man but I have turned to BP because the bet is smaller (and risk is larger).

An occasional no to me is almost meaningless if she has reputable reviews that offset it. She had a bad day, his expectations were different, etc. I do take issue with her sending white knights to post in her defense as an attempt to "use rockydoc's term" obfuscate the no review. Similar to your point Spanky, she will then be on my dns list.

Something I do if a lady gets a no - especially if she doesn't have many, or only has one - is go check other reviews by the client. If he has a pattern of giving a lot of no reviews, I'm less likely to let it sway me.

A provider that has one or two scattered usually wont sway my decision, there are some picky guys with some high expectations, now if there seems to be alot of repeat nos than i usually pass it by, but i tend to do research before seeing somebody.