Wie kann das sein?

A journalist named Emily Guendelsberger apparently breached security at the GOP confab this last weekend. Note that President Trump was in attendance and that is important. Somehow she accessed the words of several attendees and one can only surmise that she used subterfuge to this. In other words (unless she can show otherwise) she broke the law in being at the conference and recording members of the conference without their knowledge. Pennsylvania is a two party state.
The feds are going to leave it up to the local Philadelphia DA. R. Seth Williams is a registered democrat who took office in 2010. He is the first Afro-American DA in Philadelphia.

Now the other side; James O'Keefe of Project Veritas busted Planned Parenthood and Acorn with his hidden camera reports. He was arrested, charged, and convicted of using false ID in New Orleans to access the phone room inside the office of Senator Mary Landrieu (when she was NOT in attendance). He is currently a convicted felon because of this incident. It seems that another reporter should not recieve a break from another DA when the crime is worse (the Vice President was in the room with the undercover reporter).

I think Emily should get some jail time to think about her actions and be a convicted felon the rest of her life. Sauce for the goose...

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/pe...l-retreat.html

Title 50.

On another level the Service needs to step up their game with respect to persons attending functions in which the POTUS is participating or attending. It is particularly serious when persons are suggesting the POTUS be executed.

Here is the fallacy in your argument. The article states that the officials are not even sure what she did was a chargeable offense. James was caught attempting to install a tape on a phone line which is a federal crime for which he was convicted. Huge difference between the two

Here is the fallacy in your argument. Originally Posted by BigLouie

There is no "argument" when it comes to the security of the POTUS.

Here is the fallacy in your argument. The article states that the officials are not even sure what she did was a chargeable offense. James was caught attempting to install a tape on a phone line which is a federal crime for which he was convicted. Huge difference between the two Originally Posted by BigLouie

That's a lie, BL. O'Keefe plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge "of obtaining access to federal property by false pretenses": AKA "false ID" ... like your disenfranchised felons and illegal compadres use at the polls when they vote dim-retard.

Yep, Louise is lying. O'Keefe was convicted of using false ID. This reporter must have used false ID and with the president in the vicinity. If she didn't use false ID then she should give up whomever allowed her entry because that person could do the same thing with someone of evil intent. Security of the president is paramount.

Yep, Louise is lying.

Security of the president is paramount. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

BL is one of those who believe that the President should be killed if their candidate is so sorry he/she can't win an election and they can't bribe the electors to throw it in Congress! He also thinks it's ok to burn universities .. as a "protest"?

Trump needs better security.