Hmmm . . . Coincidence?
And one for the Republicans:
But, here is how to handle it:
http://reason.com/archives/2013/07/0...n-a-lawbreaker
Here is a quote from the above article, since you probably won't read it:
Auburn University philosopher Roderick Long points out that the principle lex iniusta non est lex— an unjust law is not a law —
was once, and indeed for over two millennia, the dominant position in western philosophy of law.… This doctrine was upheld by Socrates, Plato, and Xenophon, by the Stoics and by Cicero, by Augustine and Aquinas, and by Blackstone as well. The traditional idea was that law must be distinguished from mere force by its authority, and that nothing unjust could have genuine authority.
But we happily go along our merry way, enjoying the illusion of freedom allowed us by our rulers, and obey their unjust laws, so we can get to work, watch the game, have a beer, or whatever. We'll just let you keep taking away our freedom, bit by bit, because it's just a little more you're taking, so we'll just comply. Go along and get along is our motto.
Besides, if we're not doing anything wrong, we have nothing to fear, right?
Yeah. Right. You people are SO stupid. I've just handed you your ass before you have even posted, and you don't know it. Well, most of you. Some of you understand. The rest never will, at least not until their loved ones get carried away in chains for doing something they never knew was illegal.
Watch this, see yourself?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=kRtROGdtf9U