Taint Pic Thread

Go ahead taint....make my day.

This whole thread is bound to be a rule violation...you realize that right?

..... Or putting in a great deal of photoshop hours

Goat taint....makes my day. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

FIFY.

This whole thread is bound to be a rule violation...you realize that right? Originally Posted by Wakeup

Few respect the rules around here.

FIFY. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Start your own thread.

This will be the "Taintless Thread"

Have fun!

Fried chicken taint tastes great.

Few respect the rules around here. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

You're wrong...people respect the rules that can be enforced...and this is one of them...

You're wrong...people respect the rules that can be enforced...and this is one of them... Originally Posted by Wakeup

All of them can be enforced. I suspect you mean that they enforce the ones that can be 'more clearly' defined and this is one of them. Surely, even you are bright enough to realize that none of them can be exactly defined. They are all interpreted, not defined, and then enforced according to the interpretation accepted by the admin/mods. You don't respect the rules, per se, because they cannot be defined. You don't respect the 'enforceable' rules; you respect the ones that you accept as enforceable.

Go ahead taint....make my day. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

On second thought...don't

#12 - Respect the posted "Image Standards" which apply to our public coed forums. (including Showcase) In short, images which depict subjects which are topless are allowed, but below the waist nudity which displays exposed genitalia or images depicting pornography are to be avoided. Additionally, posting URL links to external sites depicting pornography is not permitted. (use RTM to report images which you feel may not be in compliance)

blah blah blah Originally Posted by tracer

Wrong...

Wrong... Originally Posted by Wakeup

The first time that you or anyone can come close to an exact definition for any of the rules, I will tell you how you came short of being exact. That you don't understand that concept is not a shock.

The first time that you or anyone can come close to an exact definition for any of the rules, I will tell you how you came short of being exact. That you don't understand that concept is not a shock. Originally Posted by tracer

What is you, Bill Clinton parsing what is the definition of is?

Good impersonation, bud.

I could swear someone said something about there being taint in this thread.