Filters

Holy shit this chick must use some serious filters because she definitely does not look like this, so annoying
https://tryst.link/escort/naveya

That sucks, Paps. There are means, however, to steer clear of the disappointments.

Photoshop, Light room, a hundred or more editing programs and now AI. Almost anyone can make a gorgeous image from nothing. So the old believe what you SEE and not what you hear is shot to hell.

Is She/Her at least "a reasonable facsimile thereof" by any chance?

Is She/Her at least "a reasonable facsimile thereof" by any chance? Originally Posted by IamVictoryasSecret

TOFTT and let all know
but ya may be putting $50 in the trash can

I wrote a review on her already that why I thought it was funny she asking that much. It's Ashley of Rochester, the chick from East Rochester

Photoshop, Light room, a hundred or more editing programs and now AI. Almost anyone can make a gorgeous image from nothing. So the old believe what you SEE and not what you hear is shot to hell. Originally Posted by ben dover

Ben,

Could you make a man (with a face only a mother could love on payday) look handsome with one of these here gizmos?

Asking for a friend --

Ben,

Could you make a man (with a face only a mother could love on payday) look handsome with one of these here gizmos?

Asking for a friend -- Originally Posted by The Drummer

Sure thing! Send me a digital image and i'll make your "Friend" look like Sean Connery when he was 30.

My Profile pic is real.

Well...except fer the hat. That was photo-shopped.

.

She dont look bad, I thought she was a troll lol

She is a troll. A very large one

Won't find any filter buttons on a Kodak 35 Rangefinder. Real was real then.

My Profile pic is real.

Well...except fer the hat. That was photo-shopped.

. Originally Posted by rooster

Thats kinda like sayin' yer profile handle says yer a rockstar only ya mistyped it and yer really someone else

Won't find any filter buttons on a Kodak 35 Rangefinder. Real was real then.

True! I shot film for decades, film was expensive, getting it developed was expensive. You had to know lighting, composition, framing, etc, etc, etc. Today just point, shoot and let the cell phone fix it all. Sad really.

Won't find any filter buttons on a Kodak 35 Rangefinder. Real was real then.

Today just point, shoot and let the cell phone fix it all. Sad really. Originally Posted by ben dover

The technology isn't sad, it's the deception that the technology makes possible with the filters and other gizmos that's sad.

My 1st cell phone didn't have a camera. So big and heavy you could use it as a wheel chock to change a flat tire.

These days you're buying a camera that can also make phone calls.

Won't find any filter buttons on a Kodak 35 Rangefinder. Real was real then.


The technology isn't sad, it's the deception that the technology makes possible with the filters and other gizmos that's sad.

My 1st cell phone didn't have a camera. So big and heavy you could use it as a wheel chock to change a flat tire.

These days you're buying a camera that can also make phone calls. Originally Posted by IamVictoryasSecret

That's true and my first cell phone was a "Car Phone" it was a motorola bag phone known as the "Brick."