
At the risk of being a labeled a resident smartass . . . For some, wouldn't 7 years of bad sex beat no sex at all? Inquiring minds want to know. Originally Posted by arklookn4lovnI can testify from personal experience that yes, indeed, 7 years of bad sex would beat no sex at all. (Well, let's say that I did experience 5 years of celibacy way back when, and 5 years of bad sex would have been much better; extrapolating from that experience, I'd definitely take the seven years of bad sex).
I can testify from personal experience that yes, indeed, 7 years of bad sex would beat no sex at all. (Well, let's say that I did experience 5 years of celibacy way back when, and 5 years of bad sex would have been much better; extrapolating from that experience, I'd definitely take the seven years of bad sex).There is sex and good sex, but no such thing as bad sex. If you can get it up it aint all that bad. And unless I lose both my arms in a tragic revolving door accident there will never be no sex. As a side note a... er... friend of mine recently came into posession of a male toy called The Fleshlight, Google it, it exists,and threatens to end dry spells in far flung places. He swears by it, not as a replacement for women but as a sturdy bridge from one to the next.
OTOH, a couple hours with Lily made those months of no sex (i.e., my latest dry spell) bearable. Or at least helped me to forget the misery.
Cheers,
bcg Originally Posted by bluffcityguy
As a side note a... er... friend of mine recently came into posession of a male toy called The Fleshlight, Google it, it exists,and threatens to end dry spells in far flung places. He swears by it, not as a replacement for women but as a sturdy bridge from one to the next. Originally Posted by Lookin4I don't have to Google it; I've come across it before on another board. I can't say I'd have invested in one for my 9 month dry spell just ended. If I were looking at another 5 year dry spell? Well, never say never...