This is directed at the moderators.
Why is it that if you post a review of a provider that warns people to stay away because they are a scam, con-artist, Rip-off, etc… you get no credit for the review because “no activities” took place.
Don’t you find warning reviews as valuable as “good” reviews?
Why do we not get credit for warning others???
I read this so many times.....
yrs ago in aspd days there was a spot for that.
no activities no review but being robbed is an activity just not the activity you wanted.
So many feeling about this post.
There is a perverse incentive to writing a “no activity” review for credit (or any incentive). What constitutes a legitimate warning (like robbery) or an inconvenience (long wait in parking lot of in call). Who is a scammer? One who advertises as GFE but refuses to kiss a monger? Requesting upfront fee for appointment or encounter? And who verifies if the no encounter encounter even took place? If credit is offered for no activity encounters, the site will have more “warnings” than reviews.
Thank you for the heads up and the warnings. Thank you for the good deed and being a good human. It’s not the same as a review, and this is a review site
This is just my observation, I actually have no say in Eccies policies and I could be completely off base