Vote chooser. Who knew.

http://www.votechooser.com/



I was surprised at who I'm aligned with.

http://www.votechooser.com/



I was surprised at who I'm aligned with. Originally Posted by LovingKayla

One important variable. . . you probably didn't lie about your answers!

It was a tie between Rick Santorum and Ron Paul for me. I'm breathing a sigh of relief. If it had been Obama, I would have had to do the whole hari kari thing. Or wear ribbons of shame for the rest of my life (an obscure reference to Ron Howard's movie Gung Ho)

It was a tie between Rick Santorum and Ron Paul for me. I'm breathing a sigh of relief. If it had been Obama, I would have had to do the whole hari kari thing. Or wear ribbons of shame for the rest of my life (an obscure reference to Ron Howard's movie Gung Ho) Originally Posted by joe bloe

or hara kiri ... which ever comes first

I disagreed with the candidates more than I agreed with any of them.

Agreed On Disagreed On
1. Newt Gingrich [details]
4 6
1. Mitt Romney [details]
4 6
2. Ron Paul [details]
3 7
2. Barack Obama [details]
3 7
3. Rick Santorum [details]
0 10


I am surprised at my results I always thought I was a liberal gay-loving hippie. I gasped when I saw Newt Gingrich at the top of the list- no I have to re-examine my whole life lol.

the quiz isnt smart enough to tell me who Im writing in

Alf Landon.

His Holiness, Dalai Lama

The possible answers are not sufficient.

One example that tells it all:
About gay marriage I would say:
Let it be decided by LOCAL LAW. not state, not federal
I can imagine that for instance in California, San Francisco and Hollywood would think different than Sacramento and San Diego.

I got a tie with Paul and Obama - is that possible?

Oh well, I hate Romney's stinking guts, so I guess its valid.

1. Ron Paul [details] 4 6
1. Barack Obama [details]4 6
2. Rick Santorum [details] 3 7
3. Newt Gingrich [details]1 9
3. Mitt Romney [details]1 9

I just realized, its in order of populism. So yeah, its valid.

Richard Nixon

The possible answers are not sufficient.

One example that tells it all:
About gay marriage I would say:
Let it be decided by LOCAL LAW. not state, not federal
I can imagine that for instance in California, San Francisco and Hollywood would think different than Sacramento and San Diego. Originally Posted by waverunner234

But if I go for the closest than as expected


OBAMA and ROMNEY shared first place
Ron Paul Second


Santorum at the very BOTTOM (where he should be, lower than that if possible)

OH man can you imagine what would happen santorum won? Talk about a far swing in the other direction.

Try this on for size:

http://www.lp.org/platform

I kinda like santorum, I bet he is a freak in bed.