Well, Tara Reade's starting to crawfish on her story. Did Biden pay her off? Maybe so, maybe not. If he did, we'll see if ol' "Sleepy Joe" leaves a paper trail like Trump did with Stormy. Originally Posted by Lapdog
Well, Tara Reade's starting to crawfish on her story. Did Biden pay her off? Maybe so, maybe not. If he did, we'll see if ol' "Sleepy Joe" leaves a paper trail like Trump did with Stormy. Originally Posted by Lapdog
Here’s a link:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ap-...ions-biden.amp
She still stands by her sexual assault claim. Lapper must have regurgitated some CNN reporting. Originally Posted by bambino
“I think the media is very slicey and dicey about how they put sentences together in order to create headlines.
You are probably right about that. The only thing remotely close to "walking it back" would be that she is saying that the reason she didn't use the words "sexual assault" at first was because of embarrassment something the professionals in this field say is common especially 27 years ago when she, I believe, used the words sexually harassed which bad by itself doesn't come near assault by being penetrated with his fingers.She also said that she may have checked a box on the form that stated assault.,
Did you see Dr Birx suggesting the media should be more careful with their headlines?
https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4...irus-headlines
While she was specifically talking about the pandemic, it applies to all subjects and YES all media does it and it's a shame. So "walking it back" probably didn't reflect the accuracy of what was actually said, it just made for a good headline, a "hook" as they call it in the media and music world.
I see Lapdog is in no hurry to set the story straight.
Originally Posted by HedonistForever