That whole Ice Age thing was super sensationalized by the media though. In the 70's climate scientists were first starting to get a good look at the human impact on climate, they knew that pollution was causing the climate to change, but it was causing it to change in different ways. Some scientists saw that some of the human produced aerosols were causing a cooling trend. This cooling trend could lead to the start of a new ice age in a few centuries. The media picked that up and ran with it. At the same time, other climate scientists were starting to see the effects of green house gasses and how they would much more rapidly warm the Earth, those findings were the foundations for modern climate science. Years passed, and now we're currently at the point where those gasses are indeed rapidly warming the Earth.
It's just way too visible at this point for me to even think about denying it (and believe me, in my younger days, I definitely held onto the idea that the climate was just on the warmer part of a cycle). We're having more extreme weather events than we have ever had, the average temperature of the globe goes up every single year, bodies of water are drying up, etc. It's just right there in front of our face plain as day now.
As a slight aside, I don't know what "elites" stand to benefit from doing something to slow this down. Three of the top 10 largest industries on the planet are Oil & Gas E&P, Automobile manufacturing, and Construction, three industries that are heavily against moving away from the reliance on fossil fuels. Those guys are "The Elite"
Originally Posted by anmar85
first off, from the 40's to the 70's temps cooled, why? the industrial revolution and all the indusries in the 40s,50s 60s and 70s polluted an incredible amount compared today
and your opinion that we have more extreme weather today than
before is without merit. these climate gurus are taking a small timeframe to suggest we are headed for disaster and it is all manmade. its pure polictical and media driven.
what do elites have to gain? money, power. its not that hard to figure out.
fyi- global cooling was mainly media driven as is global warnig but there were scientists who were predicting it in the 70's and the media ran with it. just like now
In the fall of 1973, a prominent climate scientist named Reid Bryson took the stage at an American Association of Geographers conference, and to a crowd of hundreds packed inside the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire banquet hall, he explained that the planet was cooling.
A young student named Steve LaDochy recalls sitting in the audience and being impressed with Bryson’s climate presentation, which showed that a heavily-polluted Earth had entered a cooling period. “He brought along slides, and it looked to me like very compelling evidence. So I went along with it,” says LaDochy, who today studies geoscience at California State University, Los Angeles.
Bryson wasn’t alone in his beliefs — and still isn’t.
A 1974 CIA report expressed concern over “detrimental global climate change,” citing more snow, cold spells and weather anomalies. In 1976, James Hayes, who studied Earth and environmental sciences at Columbia University, told The New York Times that global cooling had already begun, and if this became a long-term trend, “there is not much doubt that we will build substantial ice on the Northern Hemisphere continents.” Even the weather seemed to agree. Harsh winters brought historic blizzards, including the destructive “White Hurricane” of 1978.
the earth cycles climate cycles......... we pollute less than before and scientists also say if all industries stopped right now, it wouldnt make a difference......wtf its power money and control