Hide Your Dildos Ladies

TryWeakly's Avatar
WTF? Hide Dearhunter?

That is a stupid regulation.
aznlvr11's Avatar
"
The law, written in 1973 at a time when the U.S. Supreme Court was dealing with obscenity laws and cases from around the country, takes a tough stance on people who have the device.


It does make exceptions for people who have the multiples of the device for medical and law enforcement purposes."


law enforcement purposes?.....
TryWeakly's Avatar
U know.... so they have evidence ..... cant bag up a peen or vajayjay when they do their "under the covers" work.....
pyramider's Avatar
This is a ridiculous regulation.....

http://m.chron.com/news/politics/tex...#photo-8981135 Originally Posted by blackrican11
"
The law, written in 1973 at a time when the U.S. Supreme Court was dealing with obscenity laws and cases from around the country, takes a tough stance on people who have the device.


It does make exceptions for people who have the multiples of the device for medical and law enforcement purposes."


law enforcement purposes?..... Originally Posted by aznlvr11

The OP was so close ... but not so much ...
Mmm hmmm...



law enforcement purposes?..... Originally Posted by aznlvr11
Attached Images File Type: jpg nightstick.jpg (18.5 KB, 404 views)
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-21-2017, 06:23 PM
If you read the whole article, it states the law was ruled unconstitutional 10 years ago and just hasn't been taken off the books.



.
TryWeakly's Avatar
Thanks for the clarification. Now, go hide before you get someone in trouble. ^
TryWeakly's Avatar
If you read the whole article, it states the law was ruled unconstitutional 10 years ago and just hasn't been taken off the books.



. Originally Posted by WTF
You should lobby this one as much as you lobby the hobby...

...and since you are the resident dildo, technically, shouldnt you go hide?
TryWeakly's Avatar
I guess he did.