Pregnancy providers

champagnechanel's Avatar
Where is the place that pregnancy providers are in high demand?
67cree's Avatar
I love pregnant girls. The further along the better. They tend to be very horny, at least in my experience.
TheProphetJosephSmith's Avatar
I think it's hot! I love lactating tits!
burkalini's Avatar
I personally think the minute a woman becomes pregnant she should stop being active in this hobby. Her only thought should be about the health and welfare of the child. Just my old out of date opinion.
Where is the place that pregnancy providers are in high demand? Originally Posted by champagnechanel
Good point high demand in the business
NYC area is very short in pregnant and lactating providers. You would be able to work as much as you want.
I personally think the minute a woman becomes pregnant she should stop being active in this hobby. Her only thought should be about the health and welfare of the child. Just my old out of date opinion. Originally Posted by burkalini
I wouldn't call this out of date, just responsible...
joesmo888's Avatar
I personally think the minute a woman becomes pregnant she should stop being active in this hobby. Her only thought should be about the health and welfare of the child. Just my old out of date opinion. Originally Posted by burkalini
probably a good point that will be bashed by the white knights.

i'm thinking a guy who gets too aggressive or abusive can harm the pregnancy, even a guy she has seen can be a prick out of nowhere.
down4fun's Avatar
Right here, I see you have a 936# where are you located?
tandyscone's Avatar
I personally think the minute a woman becomes pregnant she should stop being active in this hobby. Her only thought should be about the health and welfare of the child. Just my old out of date opinion. Originally Posted by burkalini
Since you don't say why you thing being active in the hobby would jeopardize the health or welfare of the child, it's hard to say whether your opinion is old and out of date. If you think that somehow having sex is dangerous to a pregnancy, then your opinion is not only out of date, it is misinformed. If the danger of STIs is what prompts your opinion, it would be better to encourage the women to consult with their health care providers. Information on the internet is mixed about the danger of high risk sexual practices during pregnancy. It seems to me each woman must learn those risks, evaluate them, and then make the decision that is best for her.

I wouldn't call this out of date, just responsible... Originally Posted by VegasJen
It's not clear to me how a blanket opinion with no supporting rationale is responsible.

probably a good point that will be bashed by the white knights.

i'm thinking a guy who gets too aggressive or abusive can harm the pregnancy, even a guy she has seen can be a prick out of nowhere. Originally Posted by joesmo888
I guess it depends on what you mean by aggressive. No man has a dick big enough to harm, or even touch a fetus, so aggressive fucking is not going to be a problem. If you mean becoming physically abusive as in punching the stomach, then that could harm the fetus. But why is the hobby any different from other professions in that matter? A woman who delivers pizzas for a living might encounter a customer who would become physically abusive. Female police officers and fire fighters regularly encounter situations where they may be physically injured. Would you have all women quit their jobs and stay inside so they aren't exposed to any risk at all?
Because she is putting herself in a vulnerable position in a potentially dangerous industry. It's not just her own safety thats at stake now, its the baby's as well. A responsible parent protects their child.
Sure, there are plenty of risks in the real world as well, but in some situations, the odds increase. A pregnant police officer would not be patroling the streets, nor would a pregnant fire fighter be allowed to enter a burning building or do anything deemed strenuous. No where did anyone suggest that all women quit their jobs and stay inside to stay 'safe', thats preposterous... We are simply talking about a pregnant woman and her biological (and moral) duty to protect and care for her child here. This isn't sexist in a misogynistic sense. So let's not go there...
Totally Disgusting. That is direspectfull to an unborn child. Just lowlife behavior. Don't get pregnant by broke as men. And men don't create what you can provide for. Just sickening.
I Salute your post VegasJen!!!
tandyscone's Avatar
Because she is putting herself in a vulnerable position in a potentially dangerous industry. It's not just her own safety thats at stake now, its the baby's as well. A responsible parent protects their child.
Sure, there are plenty of risks in the real world as well, but in some situations, the odds increase. A pregnant police officer would not be patroling the streets, nor would a pregnant fire fighter be allowed to enter a burning building or do anything deemed strenuous. No where did anyone suggest that all women quit their jobs and stay inside to stay 'safe', thats preposterous... We are simply talking about a pregnant woman and her biological (and moral) duty to protect and care for her child here. This isn't sexist in a misogynistic sense. So let's not go there... Originally Posted by VegasJen
VegasJen, obviously you know more about being a provider than I do, and if you feel that you would want to quit providing the moment you got pregnant, I would never even consider trying to suggest you do otherwise. You have more first hand knowledge of the risks of being a provider, and you probably have more real knowledge about at least a few other providers.

But, pregnant police officers can and do patrol the streets. Pregnant fire fighters can and do continue to fight fires. Whether they actually enter burning buildings, I do not know. Pregnant women of all walks of life continue to do things that are "deemed strenuous." Unless/until pregnancy renders them physically incapable of performing their duties, federal law requires police and fire departments to allow pregnant women to stay on the job with normal duties.

This is all about risk and perception of risk. I don't deny for a second that being a provider exposes you to risks that most other professions do not. What I don't know is how those risks compare to other risks that pregnant women face. I also don't know what risks to the pregnancy might result from a provider deciding to quit during the pregnancy. Suppose that a provider will not be able to pay her rent or for prenatal care if she stops providing. Both of those might pose much greater risk to the fetus than continuing to act as a provider.

I have no objection to the idea of providers choosing to quit during pregnancy. My objection is to a blanket statement that all providers should quit.