Pubic Hair and Evolution

A good read.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-..._b_875465.html

I don't mind peeking through the bushes, but I've got to be able to gain access!

I a big fan of the natural bush. Some pussies just need to be covered. They are just not attractive at times. I get tired of seeing shave bumps. A pussy with a one or two day growth is downright painful at times. When its clean a full bush is soft and sexy. It just makes a woman look like a woman and not a little girl. The legs and pits need shaving but leave that pussy alone. I know I'm in the minority nowadays but things always change and I'm sure it will return someday.

I'm with burkalini......I love to nuzzle that softness while leading up to the real thing. It's fun to part the fuzz and see what's hiding. He is also correct in that shave bumps are not attractive and the stubble is downright ugly, not to mention irritating. Now, having said all of the above, I'm not a fan of a 4" long jungle.........a little trim on the longer stuff is my cup of tea.

+1 Bruk and Tennis

I like it smooth & a bush creeps me out

I like it smooth & a bush creeps me out Originally Posted by Sweet N Little

We know sweets but I hope its smooth and bump free or the guy doesn't

I a big fan of the natural bush. Originally Posted by burkalini

I'm with burkalini. Originally Posted by tennisbum

There's at least three of us in the world who like the natural look.

I admit that I am partial to naked genitals, but I agree that it's all because of porn. I think it's hard to underestimate how porn has influenced sexual practices over the last two decades. Shaved balls, facials, you name it are the product of the porn aesthetic. What strikes me is that so many people aren't aware of its influence on how we look and love.

And there is nothing worse than two day old stubble on the cooch. It's like rubbing against steel wool.

Awl4knot

We are programmed by millions of years of evolution to expect the bush. I like it either way. Unless very closely shaved I would prefer the bush. Getting razor burn takes some of the fun out of DATY.

I like a nice, neatly trimmed landing strip. Full bush turns me off as does the clean look with shaving bumps. Landing strip is the perfect compromise.

Thanks you guys for supporting natural. I wouldn't go any other way!!!!

Now, to be a hypocrite, guys who shave get their sac get the best service from me. Sucking on a hairy scrotum is not fun. I know, I know how can I say that?

It's just different...

Love a trimmed bush, it's natural and that's the way it was meant to be! We're grown "Men" and "Women" not 7 or 8 year old little kids!

Love a trimmed bush, it's natural and that's the way it was meant to be! We're grown "Men" and "Women" not 7 or 8 year old little kids! Originally Posted by Ray007

Never quite buy this "the way it was meant to be" argument, because leg and underarm hair is, technically speaking, natural on a woman too and yet I rarely, if ever, see anyone speaking out in favor of bringing that look back.

By your logic, you should not see a provider that wears makeup either, because makeup is not natural.

There is no "way it was meant to be". How a person chooses to look is how they are meant to look.

As I have suggested before, in previous versions of this thread, I think this is more a generational thing than anything else. Guys who grew up in an era of full bush have strong connections to those times, because they were the foundation for their earliest sexual fantasies. If you grew up with shaved being the norm, you'd likely find a full bush not so attractive.

Personally, I came of age in the pre-shaved days, and it did take me a little bit of time to adjust, but now I greatly prefer shaved.

I can't believe no one's posting BUSH pictures?