The judge ruling over Donald Trump's civil fraud trial wrote a scathing rebuttal of the former president's defense,.
Judge Engoron has already ruled that Trump committed fraud while filing financial statements for years.
Engorn highlighted the testimony from one of their expert witnesses in the trial, New York University Stern School of Business research professor Eli Bartov.
During his testimony, Bartov told the New York court that there is "no evidence whatsoever" that Trump or his family committed fraud with their financial statements.
Engoron said Trump and his legal team were wrong to assume that the court would accept Bertov's testimony as "true and accurate," adding: "Bartov is a tenured professor, but the only thing his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say."
Engoron added that Bartov had "lost all credibility" by "doggedly attempting to justify every misstatement" from the former president during his testimony.
"Valuing occupied residences as if vacant, valuing restricted land as if unrestricted, valuing an apartment as if it were triple its actual size, valuing property many times the amount of concealed appraisals, valuing planned buildings as if completed and ready to rent, valuing golf courses with brand premium while claiming not to, and valuing restricted funds as cash, are not subjective differences of opinion, they are misstatements at best and fraud at worst," the judge wrote.