You republicans sure pick some weird-ass people to support....this guy is a straight-up douchebag.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4522254.html
You republicans sure pick some weird-ass people to support....this guy is a straight-up douchebag.Soooo he is advising men to marry underage girls? LOL I guess he isn't much different than some Muslims...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4522254.html Originally Posted by timpage
Besides if you look back in history girls in the 1800's were getting married at 14,15 and 16 it was common place.If you look back in the 1880's women could not vote and blacks had to contend with Jim Crow laws....so yea I can see where you Duck Dynasty guys love the good ole days!
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
He said it in 2009, before they were even on TV.
Sounds just too young and they're not even out of school, yet. He's just making noise to get into the news.
That's my take on it. Crazy.
Originally Posted by ElisabethWhispers
If you look back in the 1880's women could not vote and blacks had to contend with Jim Crow laws....so yea I can see where you Duck Dynasty guys love the good ole days!I don't have a 16 year old daughter, so I can't really say. But I did state in my initial post that the Laws in most states permit marriages among 15-16 year olds with parental consent. That's really the key. I would have to consider a number of factors before I would give consent. But even though 15 and 16 is quite young to take on the responsibilities of marriage, Iam sure there would be cases where it would be successful.
Would you want to marry off your daughter at 16? Originally Posted by WTF
If you look back in the 1880's women could not vote and blacks had to contend with Jim Crow laws....so yea I can see where you Duck Dynasty guys love the good ole days!Yea..and I might add, by the time a girl turns 20 she has matured, probably college educated and can think for herself, and realizes men like this are losers. The only reason an attractive 20 year old girl/woman would consider marrying a backwards ideologic mosogynist would in fact be for money only.
Would you want to marry off your daughter at 16? Originally Posted by WTF
I don't have a 16 year old daughter, so I can't really say. But I did state in my initial post that the Laws in most states permit marriages among 15-16 year olds with parental consent. That's really the key. I would have to consider a number of factors before I would give consent. But even though 15 and 16 is quite young to take on the responsibilities of marriage, Iam sure there would be cases where it would be successful.Hell it was successful in this marriage!
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
Hell it was successful in this marriage!Hell I've seen some fifteen year olds that I have more confidence in than I have in their parents. If a 15 year old lives in a state that permits it and their parents think they have what it takes, that's up to them. It doesn't bother me at all.
So can we say that you are for 15-16 year olds getting married on a case by case basis?
For the record, I am not.
How many other Duck Dynasty lovers are for 15 year olds getting married as long as they can pluck a duck! Originally Posted by WTF
What he DID NOT say was for middle aged or old men to grab young girls and marry them. That was something you made up and maybe you violated a rule for falsely making an accusation of child molestation. 16 years old is the age of consent in 28 states. You guys really need to learn some reading comphrehension. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn