Ted Cruz Doesn’t Believe You Have the Right to Masturbate

Take your filthy government hands off my JUNK, TRUSTed!

This ought to be of great concern to all of you jerkoffs out there.

Seriously though, Cruz would expand the role of government into our private lives and private parts.

According to his college roommate, the KKKanadian KKKupcake KKKruz apparently was quite the jagoff back in the day.


http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/...as-sex-toy-ban

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURTAPRIL 14, 2016 3:10 PM
Ted Cruz Doesn’t Believe You Have the Right to Masturbate

By Kyle Rivas/Getty Images.
“There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals,” his legal team argued.
BY TINA NGUYEN

Once upon a time, when he was but a mere solicitor general for the state of Texas, Ted Cruz helped write a 76-page legal brief defending the Lone Star State’s ban on the sale of sex toys. While his argument was ultimately shot down by an appellate court, the brief resurfaced Wednesday, confronting Americans with an unfortunate juxtaposition of mental images.

Mother Jones got its hands on the 2007 brief for the case, in which Cruz was tasked with defending a state law banning the sale and advertisement of sex toys—or “obscene devices,” as he called them—an offense then punishable by up to two years in jail.

In its brief to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Cruz and his team argued that the plaintiffs challenging the law, a group of online retailers and Austin stores that sold sex toys, were not protected under the 14th Amendment’s right to privacy. In fact, he continued, banning obscene devices was in the public interest, and the government should be granted “police powers” for the purposes of “discouraging prurient interests in sexual gratification, combating the commercial sale of sex, and protecting minors.” Furthermore, using “obscene devices,” the state argued, was akin to “hiring a willing prostitute or engaging in consensual bigamy.”

Cruz observed that the law itself did not prevent people from using dildos or artificial vaginas in the privacy of their own homes, but unlike Lawrence v. Texas, the landmark Supreme Court case striking down laws prohibiting certain types of consensual sex, “there is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.” (It is unclear who penned that exact turn of phrase, but one could easily imagine Ted Cruz saying those words to a black-robed judge.)

Sadly for Cruz, and thankfully for the world, his argument was struck down and the law overturned. “The case is not about public sex. It is not about controlling commerce in sex. It is about controlling what people do in the privacy of their own homes because the State is morally opposed to a certain type of consensual private intimate conduct,” the court ruled in a 2-1 decision.

Ted Cruz Struggles to Find the Faithful

Another state attorney might have given up at this point—but not Cruz, who attempted to have the case heard by the full circuit court, Mother Jones reports. When the appeal was rejected, his legal team briefly considered taking the matter to the Supreme Court. He never submitted the case, however, and thus deprived—or saved—the world from the existence of audio wherein Ted Cruz respectfully explains the vices of autoeroticism to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Cruz’s former roommate at Princeton, Craig Mazin, who is no fan of the Texas senator, was as surprised as anyone that Cruz had once fought the right to masturbate. “I was his college roommate. This would be a new belief of his,” he tweeted Wednesday.

This is the kinda shit that makes normal people sick. . . many Republicans also want to ban birth control pills.

They want to force their religion and fake morality on everyone else, one of many reasons to vote against them.

This is the kinda shit that makes normal people sick. . . many Republicans also want to ban birth control pills.

They want to force their religion and fake morality on everyone else, one of many reasons to vote against them. Originally Posted by southtown4488

There's extremes on both ends. Politicians, Law Makers both Repub and Democrat are crazy. These people aren't wrapped tight. Ted Cruz is just one of the idiots. Hillary Clinton thinks victims of gun violence should be able to sue gun manufacturers. That's a stupid idea too. They want their twisted imaginations to become our reality. Not going to happen unless we let it.

Jim

There's extremes on both ends. Politicians, Law Makers both Repub and Democrat are crazy. These people aren't wrapped tight. Ted Cruz is just one of the idiots. Hillary Clinton thinks victims of gun violence should be able to sue gun manufacturers. That's a stupid idea too. They want their twisted imaginations to become our reality. Not going to happen unless we let it.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

False equivalency. Dems aren't the ones passing laws forcing doctors to insert ultrasound equipment into a womens vagina. that's Republicans. . clearly much worse.

False equivalency. Dems aren't the ones passing laws forcing doctors to insert ultrasound equipment into a womens vagina. that's Republicans. . clearly much worse. Originally Posted by southtown4488

WTF, are you talking about? Politicians can't force doctors to do anything. If you think there is a big difference between Repubs and Dems then you have a screw loose. These people are insecure. That's why this country is so fucked up. You can't have insecure people running a country full of insecure people. That's why you have the Bruce/Caitlyn Jenners, The Black Lives Matter, Gay rights bullshit, and countless other nonsense organizations that want their day of fame for essentially being misfits. They never give back to society they just take from it. They take from those that actually have a legitimate reason to wake up in the morning. It's pathetic what we entertain in this country.

Jim

WTF, are you talking about? Politicians can't force doctors to do anything. If you think there is a big difference between Repubs and Dems then you have a screw loose. These people are insecure. That's why this country is so fucked up. You can't have insecure people running a country full of insecure people. That's why you have the Bruce/Caitlyn Jenners, The Black Lives Matter, Gay rights bullshit, and countless other nonsense organizations that want their day of fame for essentially being misfits. They never give back to society they just take from it. They take from those that actually have a legitimate reason to wake up in the morning. It's pathetic what we entertain in this country.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

MADISON, Wis. — Gov. Scott Walker quietly signed a contentious Republican bill Friday that would require women seeking abortions to undergo an ultrasound and ban doctors who lack admitting privileges at nearby hospitals from performing the procedures.
Opponents contend legislators shouldn't force women to undergo any medical procedure and the bill will force two abortion clinics where providers lack admitting privileges to shut their doors. The law takes effect Monday. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit within hours of the signing alleging the bill is unconstitutional and asking for a temporary restraining order blocking the measure.


http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...rasound-093762

Mebbe Ted Cruz is worried about YOU lying liberals eye sight, suckclown ! He's doing you all a solid public service !

MADISON, Wis. — Gov. Scott Walker quietly signed a contentious Republican bill Friday that would require women seeking abortions to undergo an ultrasound and ban doctors who lack admitting privileges at nearby hospitals from performing the procedures.
Opponents contend legislators shouldn't force women to undergo any medical procedure and the bill will force two abortion clinics where providers lack admitting privileges to shut their doors. The law takes effect Monday. Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and the American Civil Liberties Union filed a federal lawsuit within hours of the signing alleging the bill is unconstitutional and asking for a temporary restraining order blocking the measure.


http://www.politico.com/story/2013/0...rasound-093762 Originally Posted by southtown4488

Ok so you proved my point these people are idiots. Now go find similar shit the Dems are advocating if you have the balls to do so. If you think Democrats are angels you're crazy. Besides unless you live in Wisconsin nothing Scott Walker does can affect you anyway. Go research Detroit and why fifty years of Democratic rule has put that whole city in ruins.

Jim

When I was in debate we had to argue both sides of the proposition.
You have to know how to argue against your position in order to know how to defend it.
Often we would come up with totally obscene arguments just to have some fun.
I remember making a case for communism as the answer to the proposition because of the need in capitalism to have a replaceable work force in order to control wages. this was back when tricky dick had the idea that the government should grant a minimum income for all. The end result of his idiocy was the earned income tax credit or the redistribution of wealth. Nixon was a commie.

You had to do a lot of things outside of what you actually believed in order to meet the requirements of the assignments.

Ok so you proved my point these people are idiots. Now go find similar shit the Dems are advocating if you have the balls to do so. If you think Democrats are angels you're crazy. Besides unless you live in Wisconsin nothing Scott Walker does can affect you anyway. Go research Detroit and why fifty years of Democratic rule has put that whole city in ruins.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Im having a similar discussion with "oldguy". . .im not trying to say that Dems are perfect angels, if that's how it comes across then maybe that's party my fault and that's not my intention. My argument is not that Dems are perfect, its that Repubs are clearly much worse and politics is almost always the choice of the lesser of two evils. Dems are not forcing women to have a medical device inserted into their vaginas because they choose to have perfectly legal medical procedure. . Dems aren't trying to pass laws that allows business to discriminate against the LGTB community, they are not advocating banning ALL Muslims from entering the country. these are significant differences.

Is Cruz "really" against "masturbation"?

He probably would prefer that you liberals do it private.

Im having a similar discussion with "oldguy". . .im not trying to say that Dems are perfect angels, if that's how it comes across then maybe that's party my fault and that's not my intention. My argument is not that Dems are perfect, its that Repubs are clearly much worse and politics is almost always the choice of the lesser of two evils. Dems are not forcing women to have a medical device inserted into their vaginas because they choose to have perfectly legal medical procedure. . Dems aren't trying to pass laws that allows business to discriminate against the LGTB community, they are not advocating banning ALL Muslims from entering the country. these are significant differences. Originally Posted by southtown4488

Republicans aren't worse. They seem that way to you because you don't agree with them. Besides nothing you have mentioned Republicans are doing goes against the Constitution. Democrats have been famous for toying with the 1st and 2nd Amendments. I hardly agree with anything these people say, and when the rare occasion comes along that I do agree, I am quite skeptical if they will even follow through with it. There's nothing to admire with these people. They need to be critiqued harshly by us and impeached whenever the occasion arises.

Jim

Take your filthy government hands off my JUNK, TRUSTed!

This ought to be of great concern to all of you jerkoffs out there.

Seriously though, Cruz would expand the role of government into our private lives and private parts.

According to his college roommate, the KKKanadian KKKupcake KKKruz apparently was quite the jagoff back in the day.


http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/...as-sex-toy-ban

MAY IT PLEASE THE COURTAPRIL 14, 2016 3:10 PM
Ted Cruz Doesn’t Believe You Have the Right to Masturbate

By Kyle Rivas/Getty Images.
“There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals,” his legal team argued.
BY TINA NGUYEN

Once upon a time, when he was but a mere solicitor general for the state of Texas, Ted Cruz helped write a 76-page legal brief defending the Lone Star State’s ban on the sale of sex toys. While his argument was ultimately shot down by an appellate court, the brief resurfaced Wednesday, confronting Americans with an unfortunate juxtaposition of mental images.

Mother Jones got its hands on the 2007 brief for the case, in which Cruz was tasked with defending a state law banning the sale and advertisement of sex toys—or “obscene devices,” as he called them—an offense then punishable by up to two years in jail.

In its brief to the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Cruz and his team argued that the plaintiffs challenging the law, a group of online retailers and Austin stores that sold sex toys, were not protected under the 14th Amendment’s right to privacy. In fact, he continued, banning obscene devices was in the public interest, and the government should be granted “police powers” for the purposes of “discouraging prurient interests in sexual gratification, combating the commercial sale of sex, and protecting minors.” Furthermore, using “obscene devices,” the state argued, was akin to “hiring a willing prostitute or engaging in consensual bigamy.”

Cruz observed that the law itself did not prevent people from using dildos or artificial vaginas in the privacy of their own homes, but unlike Lawrence v. Texas, the landmark Supreme Court case striking down laws prohibiting certain types of consensual sex, “there is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship.” (It is unclear who penned that exact turn of phrase, but one could easily imagine Ted Cruz saying those words to a black-robed judge.)

Sadly for Cruz, and thankfully for the world, his argument was struck down and the law overturned. “The case is not about public sex. It is not about controlling commerce in sex. It is about controlling what people do in the privacy of their own homes because the State is morally opposed to a certain type of consensual private intimate conduct,” the court ruled in a 2-1 decision.

Ted Cruz Struggles to Find the Faithful

Another state attorney might have given up at this point—but not Cruz, who attempted to have the case heard by the full circuit court, Mother Jones reports. When the appeal was rejected, his legal team briefly considered taking the matter to the Supreme Court. He never submitted the case, however, and thus deprived—or saved—the world from the existence of audio wherein Ted Cruz respectfully explains the vices of autoeroticism to Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Cruz’s former roommate at Princeton, Craig Mazin, who is no fan of the Texas senator, was as surprised as anyone that Cruz had once fought the right to masturbate. “I was his college roommate. This would be a new belief of his,” he tweeted Wednesday. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

what are you worried about old pig? your junk hasn't worked since Moses had pimples and a squeaky voice.

what are you worried about old pig? your junk hasn't worked since Moses had pimples and a squeaky voice. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

And all this time I thought YouRong was looking for endangered salamanders!

False equivalency. Dems aren't the ones passing laws forcing doctors to insert ultrasound equipment into a womens vagina. that's Republicans. . clearly much worse. Originally Posted by southtown4488

2X the FUCKIN RETARD...

insert ultrasound equipment into a womens vagina