Man's perspective on photos in a Providers showcase......ad's......websit e (if she has one)

Looking for feed back .......
On "interacting" photos. (see example below) If you saw photos of similar on a Providers showcase / AD's / website (if she has on)

Prior to ranting, does ECCIE charge the gals to update their pictures?

Examples:

Prior to ranting, does ECCIE charge the gals to update their pictures? Originally Posted by VargVike

Or even just their showcase/bio in general ?

With the new photo rules is that a violation?

There should always be a healthy dose of taint photos.

Damn....this is what happens when rw shit happens during the month of April and not the site.

I prefer to only see pics of the provider....both studio pictures AND candid pictures...

I'm fine with action shots, if you will, but since we're on the subject of pictures I'd like to voice a concern.

Ladies if all of your shots are down shots, or every one is you laying on a bed with one leg crossed over your body, I'm going to add 60lbs in my head. Not that I have anything with thick wome, but I do have a problem with being surprised by it. I have different activities in mind for different bodies.

BNG- all shapes and sizes.
K9- thick girls with fat asses are going to be broke over
like a shotgun and power pumped.
CG- spinner types I can help bounce for the required
duration.

These are just a few examples. If I need some CG and we can't accomplish that it will ruin the session. I don't give no reviews but I'm a repeat offender for the girls that fulfill the need.

What snl said

Examples:



Originally Posted by Luvs2Purrr

Those are not you, right? If they are not you, then, no.

We have enough fake photos being posted.

I'm fine with action shots, if you will, but since we're on the subject of pictures I'd like to voice a concern.

Ladies if all of your shots are down shots, or every one is you laying on a bed with one leg crossed over your body, I'm going to add 60lbs in my head. Originally Posted by learningtolead15

And you should (add another 20-30 pounds to the 150/160 that they claim) There's this one whore that I met in person last year when she was paying me with her FS for some cash that she owed me, she advertises herself as 155, I say at least 190 by her gut alone. I shudder just by the recollection . She used to be ass eater... and now goes by ass eater... and has "No protection" evidentally BUT you just "may get banned" "for not being in the loop" Just like the age 25 is the RW 30-35 In the "Latin world") . Usually only desperate (or imma cut myself for attention) whore's start stupid threADs near the end of the month; every month. And 3 sides' usual annoying ass has asked about "taint" with one of his multiple handles.... (cue the WH, gun carrying no condom wearing or the fat small Italian dicks that need the light turned off during session).

OP: My feedback. I only want to see pics like that if you have low body fat or I'm getting paid for my time.

Dang, I'm either not fat enough () or not desperate enough, as I haven't started any threads lately. Haven't even posted a recent ad! And jeez, at my age, 57, why lie? (But I do lie on beds, sofas, picnic tables, desks, carpets.... )

IMHO in light of the recent changes to the ECCIE photo standards, threads discussing imagery are currently relevant. (And yes, I know, I need new poses, too. I've been lax, but I'm semi-retired and extremely low-volume these days, working on rejuvenating a portion of the Irish Chihuahua Refuge while mostly seeing lovely loyal regulars or returning patrons who already know what I look like. Perhaps I should offer some photographer and model role play sessions?)

I think SNL said it well in that gents probably prefer a combo of well-done amateur snaps (no dirty bathroom vanities visible, please) for realism and professional pictures for glamor. And, no, I don't think L2P's examples would be in accordance with the guidelines IF they featured her, so perhaps she was avoiding points by not using herself in illustration of the question?

And to reiterate the new guidelines:

Effective immediately any personal or private photographs depicting members engaging in sex acts will no longer be allowed to be posted anywhere on the site. This however does not rule out images found on the Internet of adult film stars engaged in their profession. Additionally any personal images of NON-verified providers posing nude or partially nude will no longer be allowed on the site as well unless they are found on the Internet in places such as backpage, provider personal webpage, etc.

Ladies should post clear, clean images abiding by the rules of the host site in which THEY feel attractive, as beauty is in the eye of the beholder and not everyone has the same taste in body types. The Hobby is all about the freedom to choose blonde or brunette or redhead, spinner or Sports Illustrated angel or BBW.

[SIZE=4]Effective immediately any personal or private photographs depicting members engaging in sex acts will no longer be allowed to be posted anywhere on the site. This however does not rule out images found on the Internet of adult film stars engaged in their profession. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

Just wanted to make sure everyone knows I am not an ...


... "adult film star" ... irrespective of any gossip!

Just wanted to make sure everyone knows I am not an ...


... "adult film star" ... irrespective of any gossip! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Heheheheheh... Okay, ladies, when reviewing gents (especially LL) keep that in mind.