Oops!… Obama Adminstration Admits Killing 16 Year-Old Denver Boy in Drone Strike Was a Mistake!

It took this long? Seriously? And we're supposed to say, "Oh, that's all right." Bullshit. This is NOT "all right". Why isn't Obama being impeached? This is outrageous!

Article:

Abdulrahman Anwar al-Awlaki, a 16-year-old American citizen from Denver, was killed in a drone strike while eating dinner at an outdoor restaurant in Yemen. Abdulrahman Al-Aulaqi was the son of terrorist Anwar al-Aulaqi. He did not have a trial. He was never waterboarded. He was sixteen.

Barack Obama dropped a bomb on his head.

Barack Obama is the official who makes the final call on overseas drone strikes.

This weekend, The New York Times reported that US officials now admit that the drone bombing of the Denver teen was a mistake.

The New York Times reported:

The missile strike on Sept. 30, 2011, that killed Mr. Awlaki — a terrorist leader whose death lawyers in the Obama administration believed to be justifiable — also killed Mr. Khan, though officials had judged he was not a significant enough threat to warrant being specifically targeted. The next month, another drone strike mistakenly killed Mr. Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Abdulrahman, who had set off into the Yemeni desert in search of his father. Within just two weeks, the American government had killed three of its own citizens in Yemen. Only one had been killed on purpose.

Oops!

What bullshit! And Obama will get away with this. Unbelievable!



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013...was-a-mistake/

Are the death camps that far away............?

Collateral damage. ,

Get the fuck over it!

That's on his dad, not Obama.

So its okay to arrest and to shoot while apprehending the son (or daughter) or an American wanted for murder? Watch out! That slope is mighty slippery.

The fact is an insignificant amount of Americans are killed by drone strikes overseas, just like an insignificant amount of voter fraud exists, insignificant amounts of bad are done by liberals, the lies and cheating done by this administration ain't significant, and all because of one reason - conservatives pay an insignificant amount of taxes!

The fact is an insignificant amount of Americans are killed by drone strikes overseas, just like an insignificant amount of voter fraud exists, insignificant amounts of bad are done by liberals, the lies and cheating done by this administration ain't significant, and all because of one reason - conservatives pay an insignificant amount of taxes! Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

But you sur post a significant amount of BULLSHIT

Sorry, I am ok with this.
Dad needs to not bring his son to events if he wants to play terrorist games

Sorry, I am ok with this.
Dad needs to not bring his son to events if he wants to play terrorist games Originally Posted by Gotyour6

Son was looking for terrorist Dad , we helped him find him...in Hell!


''Here is your Daddy, come join him!"

Yeah, what a Gem. He is said to have a list.

http://youtu.be/EEKdGLddBMY

Hmmm, not sure that the gumment ever denied that they had killed the kid in the first place. Juuuusssssttttt a little misdirection from the chief high poobah of corner painting, Francis T. Grits.

Sorry, I am ok with this.
Dad needs to not bring his son to events if he wants to play terrorist games Originally Posted by Gotyour6

He wasn't with his dad when he was killed. It was a separate attack. He wasn't playing terrorist games, he was looking for his father. He was an American, not engaged in any activity threatening to the United States.

The United States has said it was a mistake to kill him. You are disagreeing with the Administration?

Innocent people killed when not engaged in active violence are not "collateral damage," they are murder victims.

He wasn't with his dad when he was killed. It was a separate attack. He wasn't playing terrorist games, he was looking for his father. He was an American, not engaged in any activity threatening to the United States.

The United States has said it was a mistake to kill him. You are disagreeing with the Administration?

Innocent people killed when not engaged in active violence are not "collateral damage," they are murder victims.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

now that you finally figured out how to post pics youre a bigger waste of space than ever ..

http://cdn-w.eccie.net/images/smilie...rn/mfr_omg.gif

He wasn't with his dad when he was killed. It was a separate attack. He wasn't playing terrorist games, he was looking for his father. He was an American, not engaged in any activity threatening to the United States.

The United States has said it was a mistake to kill him. You are disagreeing with the Administration?

Innocent people killed when not engaged in active violence are not "collateral damage," they are murder victims.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Since you learned to cut and paste your IQ level has dropped 10 points.

Once again COG is right, the devil is in the details. The allies (that was us) killed thousands of Frenchmen during World War II when we bombed railyards, submarine pens, and munition factories in France. They were collateral damage. We did not intentionally target Frenchmen but they were there. This kid was targeted not his father. If we took out a convoy with a known terrorist and the drivers were all innocent then that is collateral damage. If we targeted an empty convoy to kill the drivers (and to show our dominance to the locals) then that is NOT collateral damage.