Question for moderator

Hi I have had a few reviews recently that are affecting me and they are absolutely not true, it isn't necessarily a bad review but it's not something I'll do it said I did all our activities uncovered and I don't and won't do that so now everyone that sees it calls me for that which is a no for me or the clients I do want to see don't call me cause they are obviously afraid they might catch something and I don't blame them the one that started it said I did cim then he texted me on my personal line and said he knew that wasn't true but he was trying to give me a good review and thought it would help which it didn't the main review I'm talking about said I did pegging which I don't and won't do and that all of our activities were uncovered I know who wrote this and I know he did it because he was angry with me because I refused to do my services without protection so I guess he thought he would show me by putting that review on there I don't know but I don't know if there's anything you can do but please can you take it down or do something cuz it's not true last review that man told me he knew the person who wrote the review before and I don't even know what it says under the other part that I can't see but he tried to take advantage of the whole situation and try to get more everything he could for as little as possible and take advantage this is ridiculous I'm a good provider but I am clean and safe

Guideline # 23 provides the information that you are seeking.

You are able to post your rebuttal to an Encounter Report in the Co-Ed Discussions Forum provided it complies with the Eccie Guidelines.

Additionally, you can Report the Encounter Reports that you are disputing.

This will identify the Report(s) that will require a Staff inquiry.

#23 - Disputed reviews will not be removed by staff unless the request is made by the thread starter. In situations such as this, the proper protocol for addressing a review in question is to post a rebuttal to the review in that city forum's coed discussions area. Staff will be happy to do some basic investigation to confirm the validity of such reviews, however removal will only take place when requested by the thread-starter or in extreme cases where it has been proven false, there is an admission by the reviewer that the review is indeed false, or the reviewer failed to cooperate with staff's efforts to confirm validity. In cases where a reviewer is found to have posted a review of a session which did not take place, or posted blatantly false information within a review, the reviewer will be subject to disciplinary action at the discretion of staff, which could lead to loss of posting privileges. Along those same lines, if the reviewed party is found to be making false or inaccurate claims to staff in an attempt to trigger staff action against a reviewer or the removal of a review, that party will also be subject to consequences, up to or including temporary or permanent loss of account access. These measures exist to preserve the integrity of the information posted in our review forums, and will be taken when these circumstances exist.