'Obamacare' will raise pizza prices

If this doesn't get that horrific legislation repealed, nothing will.

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2...es-131331.html

Uh oh! Looks like I won't be able to eat pizza anymore. THANKS A LOT OBAMA! First he screws our credit rating, does nothing for the private sector, and now he will cause me to have to eat Totinos party pizzas because that is all I will be able to afford! IMPEACH HIM! Hurry! Before he gets reelected.

wonder how much it costs the customers for the Papa John Dallas Cowboys sponsorship?

being the Offical Pizza of the Dallas Cowboys aint cheap.

drop the costs it takes for Jerry to come on a tv commercial, and the price of the air time during a prime time event, and offset the costs ... what else would a good CEO do to save his stock holders $$, bitch ?


anyone see the irony of a fuckin Pizza guy railing about better health ??

lol

Jesus, CBJ7. You are clueless. Nuance escapes you, doesn't it?

Jesus, CBJ7. You are clueless. Nuance escapes you, doesn't it? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

a romney supoorter bitching about Obiecare costing his company 20 cents a pizza escapes my non partisan gland, and activates my horseshit warning alarm

fuck Papa John, I want to see the actual numbers his accounting firm came up with and then I want to see those #'s audited by another independent accounting firm

WHERE ARE THOSE ACCOUNTING REPORTS PAPA JOHN? WE WONT TAKE YOUR WORD !

Gawd. You are an idiot, CBJ7. Not calling names, simply stating a fact.

Gawd. You are an idiot, CBJ7. Not calling names, simply stating a fact. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

honestly, youre not interested in transparency from Papa John?


thats has to be a fukin first

scratch that, hes a rightwinger, you could care less, just believe everything he says

Jesus, CBJ7. You are clueless. Nuance escapes you, doesn't it? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Some people just don't get irony. It must be like being color blind or tone deaf.

Some people just don't get irony. It must be like being color blind or tone deaf. Originally Posted by joe bloe

tantamount to sarcasim flying over your head

I make my own for pennies;; fuck ObamacareTax....fugetabout PappaJohns...

Damn! Party at Whirly's!!!

The National Restaurant Association pointed out following the health care law's Supreme Court approval that it may adversely affect restaurants’ ability to maintain already slim profit margins because it requires companies of more than 50 employees to provide affordable health insurance.
One Papa John's franchise owner in Texas, Judy Nichols, says the law could interfere with her ability to open more restaurants.
“I have two options, I can stop offering coverage and pay the $2,000 fine, or I could keep my number of staff under 50 so the mandate doesn't apply,” she told Legal Newsline. Nichols added that the law may cost her between $20,000 to $30,000 extra in taxes. “Obamacare is making me think about cutting jobs instead," she said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...6pLid%3D189665

Jesus, CBJ7. You are clueless. Nuance escapes you, doesn't it? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

I would think that nuance would have to first be present in order to make it's escape.

I would think that nuance would have to first be present in order to make it's escape. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

there must be a slight difference in the definition of nuance and COF's version ...


aint that right COF?

“I have two options, I can stop offering coverage and pay the $2,000 fine, or I could keep my number of staff under 50 so the mandate doesn't apply,” she told Legal Newsline. Nichols added that the law may cost her between $20,000 to $30,000 extra in taxes. “Obamacare is making me think about cutting jobs instead," she said. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Someone fill me in on her logic. It sounds to me like she currently offers coverage (based on her stating that one of her options is to stop offering coverage and pay the fine), but then she goes on to say that her other option is to limit herself to 49 employees so as to not be required to offer coverage. How does that make sense?