Ender, did you REALLY have to toss in that insult?
Originally Posted by LilMynx69
Probably not, but given the tone of the OP's question, I assumed this was a tongue-in-cheek analysis of proper etiquette when the hobbyist is disappointed with the appearance of a provider, OR finds her to be physically repellant.
I stand by my statement. If a provider can have a NBA policy, a hobbyist can have a NUA (No Uggos Allowed) policy. And until a full examination and/or disclosure of the appearance of a provider has been made, any hobbyist has full rights of withdrawal from the transaction. Its up to him how "gentlemanly" he wishes to be -- i.e. how much (if any) compensation he tenders for her time and effort. Some would suggest that full compensation is in order. No. Others that her expenses (gas, room, etc.) should be reimbursed. To this, I offer that the hobbyist is also out time and expenses in getting to the appointment due to her false or unclear advertising. It's possible that the parties owe each other nothing.