http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B32sYF91KyM
http://washingtonexaminer.com/youtub...rticle/2534287
YouTube video of Reggie Love interview deleted after comments hit Drudge By CHARLIE SPIERING | AUGUST 15, 2013 AT 8:05 AM
A YouTube video featuring an interview with former Obama bodyman Reggie Love was removed after his comments surfaced in news reports highlighting some private details from President Obama’s life in the White House.
The video, posted by the Artists and Athletes Alliance YouTube account, featured a July 18 interview with Love and Jim Newton, the editor-at-large of the Los Angeles Times, during a lunch hosted by the Alliance with UCLA’s Luskin School of Public Affairs.
A promotional still in the video describes the session as “a private briefing on decision making in the Oval Office with Reggie Love”
The video only shows highlights from the interview, as Love talked about daily life with the president, including the historic day when Osama bin Laden was killed.
While advisers huddled in the situation room, Love revealed that he and Obama played cards during part of the day.
“[President Obama] was like, ‘I’m not, I’m not going to be down there, I can’t watch this entire thing’,” Love said. “We must have played 15 hands-15 games of Spades.”
Love also joked about the day that Obama “finally found his birth certificate.”
“I remember when he finally found his birth certificate,” he said with a grin.
“It took a little too long, by the way,” Newton added, prompting laughter from the crowd.
“You know, your parents don’t live together you travel all over the world, documents get lost there,” Love continued.
Love revealed that Obama just wanted to walk into the press briefing room in the White House and put the birth certificate on the podium, but his staff disagreed.
“Everyone was like ‘That’s a really bad idea’,” Love said. “But he was very gung-ho about doing it, because he was so irritated about it.”
Love also revealed details of Obama's phone call with President George W. Bush about passing the Wall Street bailout and conversations with the president on the campaign trail.
“We came up with a sort of like – no MSNBC, no CNN – only sports,” Love explained. “If we’re not at a campaign event, no politics.”
The video was deleted from the Artists and Athletes Alliance YouTube account shortly after a report about Love’s comments was linked on the Drudge Report.
Although the Artists and Athletes Alliance has deleted the video, several copies still exist on YouTube – including this one.
- therock18
- 08-15-2013, 07:13 PM
- CJ7
- 08-15-2013, 07:19 PM
that's as bad as your death panels that don't exist thread
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-15-2013, 07:45 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B32sYF91KyMNo problem against this post. It is just more propaganda. Put out by Ozombies. You can't trust these fuckers.
http://washingtonexaminer.com/youtub...rticle/2534287
YouTube video of Reggie Love interview deleted after comments hit Drudge By CHARLIE SPIERING | AUGUST 15, 2013 AT 8:05 AM
A YouTube video featuring an interview with former Obama bodyman Reggie Love was removed after his comments surfaced in news reports highlighting some private details from President Obama’s life in the White House.
The video, posted by the Artists and Athletes Alliance YouTube account, featured a July 18 interview with Love and Jim Newton, the editor-at-large of the Los Angeles Times, during a lunch hosted by the Alliance with UCLA’s Luskin School of Public Affairs.
A promotional still in the video describes the session as “a private briefing on decision making in the Oval Office with Reggie Love”
The video only shows highlights from the interview, as Love talked about daily life with the president, including the historic day when Osama bin Laden was killed.
While advisers huddled in the situation room, Love revealed that he and Obama played cards during part of the day.
“[President Obama] was like, ‘I’m not, I’m not going to be down there, I can’t watch this entire thing’,” Love said. “We must have played 15 hands-15 games of Spades.”
Love also joked about the day that Obama “finally found his birth certificate.”
“I remember when he finally found his birth certificate,” he said with a grin.
“It took a little too long, by the way,” Newton added, prompting laughter from the crowd.
“You know, your parents don’t live together you travel all over the world, documents get lost there,” Love continued.
Love revealed that Obama just wanted to walk into the press briefing room in the White House and put the birth certificate on the podium, but his staff disagreed.
“Everyone was like ‘That’s a really bad idea’,” Love said. “But he was very gung-ho about doing it, because he was so irritated about it.”
Love also revealed details of Obama's phone call with President George W. Bush about passing the Wall Street bailout and conversations with the president on the campaign trail.
“We came up with a sort of like – no MSNBC, no CNN – only sports,” Love explained. “If we’re not at a campaign event, no politics.”
The video was deleted from the Artists and Athletes Alliance YouTube account shortly after a report about Love’s comments was linked on the Drudge Report.
Although the Artists and Athletes Alliance has deleted the video, several copies still exist on YouTube – including this one. Originally Posted by therock18
- therock18
- 08-15-2013, 08:12 PM
- i'va biggen
- 08-15-2013, 08:48 PM
OOOOOH death panels Sara lives.
- CJ7
- 08-15-2013, 09:02 PM
If you would get the SHIT out of your eyes you would know that there are death panels!!!! But that probably wouldn't help as you are a libtard and CAN'T READ EITHER!!!! Originally Posted by therock18
live and learn little boy ... we'll see who can read
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...-death-panels/
- therock18
- 08-15-2013, 09:13 PM
Lets see if your comprehension can understand this article. This was written in 2013. Even Libtard Howard Dean admits that Obamacare has Death Panels.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/h...them-repealed/
Howard Dean Admits Obamacare Includes Death Panels, Wants Them Repealed
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 7/29/13 11:45 AM
When Congress debated Obamacare, pro-life advocates and Republicans like Sarah Palin were castigated for claiming the government-run health care program would include death panels that would ration health care treatment.
Now, former presidential candidate Howard Dean has essentially admitted they were right and is calling for the repeal of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). In a Wall Street Journal op-ed Monday he called the IPAB “essentially a health-care rationing body” that he believes will fail.
“There does have to be control of costs in our health-care system. However, rate setting — the essential mechanism of the IPAB — has a 40-year track record of failure,” Dean wrote.
Dean, who is a healthcare industry representative as a senior adviser at the law and lobbying firm McKenna Long & Aldridge, said his experience as governor of Vermont turned him off to government control of healthcare prices.
“What ends up happening in these schemes (which many states including my home state of Vermont have implemented with virtually no long-term effect on costs) is that patients and physicians get aggravated because bureaucrats in either the private or public sector are making medical decisions without knowing the patients,” Dean wrote.
“By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them,” Dean added. “Most important, once again, these kinds of schemes do not control costs. The medical system simply becomes more bureaucratic.”
There does have to be control of costs in our health-care system, Mr. Dean writes, but rate setting “has a 40-year track record of failure.”
More on Dean’s article:
Dean writes that in order to have a secure future, the country has to move away from fee-for-service medicine, “which is all about incentives to spend more, and has no incentives in the system to keep patients healthy. The IPAB has no possibility of helping to solve this major problem and will almost certainly make the system more bureaucratic and therefore drive up administrative costs.”
The IPAB was labeled a “death panel” by Republicans in the run-up to the 2010 midterm elections; among its most prominent critics was former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
On the campaign trail last year, Rep. Paul Ryan, the GOP’s vice presidential nominee, said that with the board, Mr. Obama “puts a board of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in charge of Medicare, who are required to cut Medicare in ways that will lead to denied care for current seniors.”
PolitiFact rated the claim “mostly false,” but Mr. Dean has provided some high-profile bipartisan opposition to the board.
“The IPAB will cause frustration to providers and patients alike, and it will fail to control costs,” Mr. Dean wrote. “When, and if, the atmosphere on Capitol Hill improves and leadership becomes interested again in addressing real problems instead of posturing, getting rid of the IPAB is something Democrats and Republicans ought to agree on.”
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/07/29/h...them-repealed/
Howard Dean Admits Obamacare Includes Death Panels, Wants Them Repealed
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 7/29/13 11:45 AM
When Congress debated Obamacare, pro-life advocates and Republicans like Sarah Palin were castigated for claiming the government-run health care program would include death panels that would ration health care treatment.
Now, former presidential candidate Howard Dean has essentially admitted they were right and is calling for the repeal of the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). In a Wall Street Journal op-ed Monday he called the IPAB “essentially a health-care rationing body” that he believes will fail.
“There does have to be control of costs in our health-care system. However, rate setting — the essential mechanism of the IPAB — has a 40-year track record of failure,” Dean wrote.
Dean, who is a healthcare industry representative as a senior adviser at the law and lobbying firm McKenna Long & Aldridge, said his experience as governor of Vermont turned him off to government control of healthcare prices.
“What ends up happening in these schemes (which many states including my home state of Vermont have implemented with virtually no long-term effect on costs) is that patients and physicians get aggravated because bureaucrats in either the private or public sector are making medical decisions without knowing the patients,” Dean wrote.
“By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them,” Dean added. “Most important, once again, these kinds of schemes do not control costs. The medical system simply becomes more bureaucratic.”
There does have to be control of costs in our health-care system, Mr. Dean writes, but rate setting “has a 40-year track record of failure.”
More on Dean’s article:
Dean writes that in order to have a secure future, the country has to move away from fee-for-service medicine, “which is all about incentives to spend more, and has no incentives in the system to keep patients healthy. The IPAB has no possibility of helping to solve this major problem and will almost certainly make the system more bureaucratic and therefore drive up administrative costs.”
The IPAB was labeled a “death panel” by Republicans in the run-up to the 2010 midterm elections; among its most prominent critics was former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
On the campaign trail last year, Rep. Paul Ryan, the GOP’s vice presidential nominee, said that with the board, Mr. Obama “puts a board of 15 unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats in charge of Medicare, who are required to cut Medicare in ways that will lead to denied care for current seniors.”
PolitiFact rated the claim “mostly false,” but Mr. Dean has provided some high-profile bipartisan opposition to the board.
“The IPAB will cause frustration to providers and patients alike, and it will fail to control costs,” Mr. Dean wrote. “When, and if, the atmosphere on Capitol Hill improves and leadership becomes interested again in addressing real problems instead of posturing, getting rid of the IPAB is something Democrats and Republicans ought to agree on.”
- therock18
- 08-15-2013, 09:19 PM
Death Panels are in ObamaCare!!!!
http://personalliberty.com/2013/08/0...-death-panels/
http://www.examiner.com/article/obam...at-howard-dean
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3dDlvtCwnM
I could post 1,000,000 more links but doubt your libtard brain would read it or understand it.
http://personalliberty.com/2013/08/0...-death-panels/
http://www.examiner.com/article/obam...at-howard-dean
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3dDlvtCwnM
I could post 1,000,000 more links but doubt your libtard brain would read it or understand it.
- JCM800
- 08-15-2013, 09:25 PM
- sexaholic87
- 08-15-2013, 10:19 PM
Therock illustrates a very sad trait in America...
The death of the informed voter.
Who the fuck is "lifenews"??? The examiner is probably the most credible... But even that site shouldn't be classified as a news site... anyone can be an examiner.
But yet, he trusts those sites over politifact, a site that has won AWARDS for its journalism. That is fairly non partisan. They look into each issue without bias. But because it doesn't fit his narrative... It's just the "mainstream media".
I'm not saying that you should love obamacare, but at least argue it with facts... not just something Sarah Palin said and a lot if fake news sites parroted as truth when it's not.
The death of the informed voter.
Who the fuck is "lifenews"??? The examiner is probably the most credible... But even that site shouldn't be classified as a news site... anyone can be an examiner.
But yet, he trusts those sites over politifact, a site that has won AWARDS for its journalism. That is fairly non partisan. They look into each issue without bias. But because it doesn't fit his narrative... It's just the "mainstream media".
I'm not saying that you should love obamacare, but at least argue it with facts... not just something Sarah Palin said and a lot if fake news sites parroted as truth when it's not.
- therock18
- 08-15-2013, 10:57 PM
Your drinking your own kool aid made of urine! Here you go Libtard - From Howard Dean's MOUTH!
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...498014414.html
The Affordable Care Act's Rate-Setting Won't Work Experience tells me the Independent Payment Advisory Board will fail.
By HOWARD DEAN
Continuing efforts by congressional Republicans to "defund" further implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, even if it takes shutting down the federal government, are willfully destructive. As Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) told the press last week, "I think it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard . . . as long as Barack Obama is president the Affordable Care Act is gonna be law."
Clearly, the foremost achievement of President Obama's first term is the Affordable Care Act, and when fully implemented the law will move America closer to universal health coverage—something many progressives have sought for years. Like it or not, the law—at least its foundation—is here to stay, and lawmakers ought to focus over the next year on ensuring a relatively smooth implementation.
Although I've been critical of many components of the law, there is still much to applaud. Accountable Care Organizations could eliminate duplicative services and prevent medical errors while seeking to reduce costs for individuals, particularly if their creation ultimately leads to the end of fee-for-service medicine, as I believe it will. In addition, the Health Insurance Marketplace exchange systems, once implemented, will provide individuals with competitive plan options based on price, services, quality and other factors. Even more important, the exchanges will make the process of securing health insurance much easier and more transparent for millions who don't currently have it.
The administration's decision to delay implementation of the employer mandate until 2015 will help funnel individuals and families who do not get insurance through their employer into the exchanges. While this may benefit the participating insurers in the short term, this also accelerates the trend toward divorcing health care from employment. This is not a radical idea, and was even proposed by Sen. John McCain in his 2008 presidential campaign. That development will lead to the end of job lock for workers and contribute to a more competitive American business community in the longer run.
That said, the law still has its flaws, and American lawmakers and citizens have both an opportunity and responsibility to fix them.
One major problem is the so-called Independent Payment Advisory Board. The IPAB is essentially a health-care rationing body. By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them.
(YEP - DEATH PANELS!!!! Sarah Palin was right!!!)
There does have to be control of costs in our health-care system. However, rate setting—the essential mechanism of the IPAB—has a 40-year track record of failure. What ends up happening in these schemes (which many states including my home state of Vermont have implemented with virtually no long-term effect on costs) is that patients and physicians get aggravated because bureaucrats in either the private or public sector are making medical decisions without knowing the patients. Most important, once again, these kinds of schemes do not control costs. The medical system simply becomes more bureaucratic.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has indicated that the IPAB, in its current form, won't save a single dime before 2021. As everyone in Washington knows, but less frequently admits, CBO projections of any kind—past five years or so—are really just speculation. I believe the IPAB will never control costs based on the long record of previous attempts in many of the states, including my own state of Vermont.
If Medicare is to have a secure future, we have to move away from fee-for-service medicine, which is all about incentives to spend more, and has no incentives in the system to keep patients healthy. The IPAB has no possibility of helping to solve this major problem and will almost certainly make the system more bureaucratic and therefore drive up administrative costs.
To date, 22 Democrats have joined Republicans in the House and Senate in support of legislation to do away with the IPAB. Yet because of the extraordinary partisanship on Capitol Hill and Republican threats to defund the law through the appropriations process, it is unlikely that any change in the Affordable Care Act will take place soon.
The IPAB will cause frustration to providers and patients alike, and it will fail to control costs. When, and if, the atmosphere on Capitol Hill improves and leadership becomes interested again in addressing real problems instead of posturing, getting rid of the IPAB is something Democrats and Republicans ought to agree on.
Mr. Dean, governor of Vermont from 1991 to 2002 and a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, is a strategic adviser to McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP.
A version of this article appeared July 29, 2013, on page A13 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Affordable Care Act's Rate-Setting Won't Work.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...498014414.html
The Affordable Care Act's Rate-Setting Won't Work Experience tells me the Independent Payment Advisory Board will fail.
By HOWARD DEAN
Continuing efforts by congressional Republicans to "defund" further implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, even if it takes shutting down the federal government, are willfully destructive. As Sen. Richard Burr (R., N.C.) told the press last week, "I think it's the dumbest idea I've ever heard . . . as long as Barack Obama is president the Affordable Care Act is gonna be law."
Clearly, the foremost achievement of President Obama's first term is the Affordable Care Act, and when fully implemented the law will move America closer to universal health coverage—something many progressives have sought for years. Like it or not, the law—at least its foundation—is here to stay, and lawmakers ought to focus over the next year on ensuring a relatively smooth implementation.
Although I've been critical of many components of the law, there is still much to applaud. Accountable Care Organizations could eliminate duplicative services and prevent medical errors while seeking to reduce costs for individuals, particularly if their creation ultimately leads to the end of fee-for-service medicine, as I believe it will. In addition, the Health Insurance Marketplace exchange systems, once implemented, will provide individuals with competitive plan options based on price, services, quality and other factors. Even more important, the exchanges will make the process of securing health insurance much easier and more transparent for millions who don't currently have it.
The administration's decision to delay implementation of the employer mandate until 2015 will help funnel individuals and families who do not get insurance through their employer into the exchanges. While this may benefit the participating insurers in the short term, this also accelerates the trend toward divorcing health care from employment. This is not a radical idea, and was even proposed by Sen. John McCain in his 2008 presidential campaign. That development will lead to the end of job lock for workers and contribute to a more competitive American business community in the longer run.
That said, the law still has its flaws, and American lawmakers and citizens have both an opportunity and responsibility to fix them.
One major problem is the so-called Independent Payment Advisory Board. The IPAB is essentially a health-care rationing body. By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them.
(YEP - DEATH PANELS!!!! Sarah Palin was right!!!)
There does have to be control of costs in our health-care system. However, rate setting—the essential mechanism of the IPAB—has a 40-year track record of failure. What ends up happening in these schemes (which many states including my home state of Vermont have implemented with virtually no long-term effect on costs) is that patients and physicians get aggravated because bureaucrats in either the private or public sector are making medical decisions without knowing the patients. Most important, once again, these kinds of schemes do not control costs. The medical system simply becomes more bureaucratic.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has indicated that the IPAB, in its current form, won't save a single dime before 2021. As everyone in Washington knows, but less frequently admits, CBO projections of any kind—past five years or so—are really just speculation. I believe the IPAB will never control costs based on the long record of previous attempts in many of the states, including my own state of Vermont.
If Medicare is to have a secure future, we have to move away from fee-for-service medicine, which is all about incentives to spend more, and has no incentives in the system to keep patients healthy. The IPAB has no possibility of helping to solve this major problem and will almost certainly make the system more bureaucratic and therefore drive up administrative costs.
To date, 22 Democrats have joined Republicans in the House and Senate in support of legislation to do away with the IPAB. Yet because of the extraordinary partisanship on Capitol Hill and Republican threats to defund the law through the appropriations process, it is unlikely that any change in the Affordable Care Act will take place soon.
The IPAB will cause frustration to providers and patients alike, and it will fail to control costs. When, and if, the atmosphere on Capitol Hill improves and leadership becomes interested again in addressing real problems instead of posturing, getting rid of the IPAB is something Democrats and Republicans ought to agree on.
Mr. Dean, governor of Vermont from 1991 to 2002 and a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, is a strategic adviser to McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP.
A version of this article appeared July 29, 2013, on page A13 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Affordable Care Act's Rate-Setting Won't Work.
Therock illustrates a very sad trait in America...
The death of the informed voter.
Who the fuck is "lifenews"??? The examiner is probably the most credible... But even that site shouldn't be classified as a news site... anyone can be an examiner.
But yet, he trusts those sites over politifact, a site that has won AWARDS for its journalism. That is fairly non partisan. They look into each issue without bias. But because it doesn't fit his narrative... It's just the "mainstream media".
I'm not saying that you should love obamacare, but at least argue it with facts... not just something Sarah Palin said and a lot if fake news sites parroted as truth when it's not. Originally Posted by MrGoodBar
- Guest123018-4
- 08-16-2013, 06:54 AM
This reminds me of the government telling us that the Patriot Act would not lead to misuse and it was only to protect us from terrorists.
The Affordable Healthcare Act is no different in its ability for misuse.
Both of these are terrible pieces of legislation that further reduces the individual liberty and freedom of our citizens.
The idea that a person will blindly support either of these because it was their party that got it going tells a sad story.
The Affordable Healthcare Act is no different in its ability for misuse.
Both of these are terrible pieces of legislation that further reduces the individual liberty and freedom of our citizens.
The idea that a person will blindly support either of these because it was their party that got it going tells a sad story.
- timpage
- 08-16-2013, 10:07 AM
This reminds me of the government telling us that the Patriot Act would not lead to misuse and it was only to protect us from terrorists.Blind opposition to everything because of party politics is pretty fucking sad as well. Take a look in the mirror.
The Affordable Healthcare Act is no different in its ability for misuse.
Both of these are terrible pieces of legislation that further reduces the individual liberty and freedom of our citizens.
The idea that a person will blindly support either of these because it was their party that got it going tells a sad story. Originally Posted by The2Dogs
- Randy4Candy
- 08-16-2013, 10:20 AM
Your drinking your own kool aid made of urine! Here you go Libtard - From Howard Dean's MOUTH!
One major problem is the so-called Independent Payment Advisory Board. The IPAB is essentially a health-care rationing body. By setting doctor reimbursement rates for Medicare and determining which procedures and drugs will be covered and at what price, the IPAB will be able to stop certain treatments its members do not favor by simply setting rates to levels where no doctor or hospital will perform them.
(YEP - DEATH PANELS!!!! Sarah Palin was right!!!) Uh, 18rocksinyourhead, what you are decrying as a "death panel" isn't - by any definition or stretch of imagination. I can read it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
A version of this article appeared July 29, 2013, on page A13 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Affordable Care Act's Rate-Setting Won't Work.Shouldn't the Wall Street Urinal's headline contain the phrase "Death Panel"? Originally Posted by therock18
This reminds me of the government telling us that the Patriot Act would not lead to misuse and it was only to protect us from terrorists.Poor ol' Nutlickers, his boyz, the Neo-con Whigs, led by his daddy Dick Cheney, capitalized on the furor and panic (that's right, panic) right after 9/11/01 to force this piece of shit legislation through while the country was all up in arms about what happened. So much for governing or legislating with rationality.....the circumstances surrounding the passage of each of those pieces of legislation are completely different, but revisionism knows no shame or boundaries when trying to put 10-lbs of b.s. in a 5-lb bag. Go back and pull the tapes from the Faux National Socialist Network and see how hard your script writers were pimping the so-called "Patriot Act." BTW, the use of the word patriot seems to be a favorite stalking horse of the Whacked-out Rat Wang, aka, Teawipe "Patriots." What a transparent joke you phuckers are.
The Affordable Healthcare Act is no different in its ability for misuse.
Both of these are terrible pieces of legislation that further reduces the individual liberty and freedom of our citizens.
The idea that a person will blindly support either of these because it was their party that got it going tells a sad story. Originally Posted by The2Dogs
- Yssup Rider
- 08-17-2013, 03:28 AM
dumbfuck Marshall is back... Again!