Trump Org. Found Liable for Fraud. May Lose Trump Tower and Other Properties.

well the NY judge in Trump's civil fraud case confirmed what we already knew: fraud is a feature not a bug in the Trump Org.'s business model. apparently, his assets may be seized by a receiver and auctioned off. the Trump Org business certification has been revoked. what do you all think of this new development?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...151124791.html

is this the beginning of the end for Trump's NY real estate empire? maybe this whole presidency thing wasn't such a good idea after all for Trump? the NY AG asked for 250 million. maybe that's all Trump is worth, actually? and then, what, he uses only his political donations to keep paying his astronomical legal fees? will donors finally balk?

well the NY judge in Trump's civil fraud case confirmed what we already knew: fraud is a feature not a bug in the Trump Org.'s business model. apparently, his assets may be seized by a receiver and auctioned off. the Trump Org business certification has been revoked. what do you all think of this new development?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...151124791.html

is this the beginning of the end for Trump's NY real estate empire? maybe this whole presidency thing wasn't such a good idea after all for Trump? the NY AG asked for 250 million. maybe that's all Trump is worth, actually? and then, what, he uses only his political donations to keep paying his astronomical legal fees? will donors finally balk? Originally Posted by pxmcc

Did you ejaculate when you read this?

Did you ejaculate when you read this? Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

no, i applauded it as a good common sense decision and long overdue. what about you?

on a related Trump matter, seditionist and Trump Jan.6 co-conspirator Jim Jordan sent Fulton County Fani Willis a second "inquiry" for his "investigation" about her prosecution of Trump for his call to the GA. SOS to "find" over 11,000 votes. at some point, he will become criminally liable for Obstruction of Justice for trying to block her well-justified criminal prosecution of Trump and his co-conspirators, and then should be indicted twice, not just once. but we know Merrick Garland is still asleep at the switch. Wake up, Merrick! Chop chop, up n at'em! Duty calls!

Did you ejaculate when you read this? Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

alright, i try to stay way from politics esp in this forum, but you are too cliche for me to ignore lol. classic MAGA way of arguing, when have no counter argument go to insults. especially looking at threads you create and then you want your "loud opinions", to be taken seriously.

"impeach biden, indict hunter" im yet to hear an actual crime president committed besides speculations, because for indictment there has to be an actual crime on misdemeanor at least.

i can list trumps crimes easily: 32 counts related to unauthorized retention of national security secrets , 7 counts obstructing investigation, 3 false statements, 1 count of conspiracy to defraud united states, falsifying business records, 2 counts related to effort to obstruct vote certification procedure, 1 count of conspiracy to violate civil rights, 23 counts related to forgery or false document statements, 8 counts related to soliciting i could go on total i believe are over 90 counts pending for your glorious leader.

i agree that biden may seem too senile and probably is. minus some confused words he at least makes sense. still better than man child who not only word vomits whatever he read on horoscope and needs adult's supervision how to act.

party wise both sides have extreme examples, what we need to is stop focusing on party and start focusing on policies. There are good republicans and good democrats, there are BCS in both although red BCS are lauder (give me MTG equal on blue side lol)

also we should really make some constitutional amendments for a ceiling to presidents age.

edit: BCS = BSC

alright, i try to stay way from politics esp in this forum, but you are too cliche for me to ignore lol. classic MAGA way of arguing, when have no counter argument go to insults. especially looking at threads you create and then you want your "loud opinions", to be taken seriously. Originally Posted by OtherChevyGuy

When you've been on this site for a year or so, I may care what you think, until then you're just a newbie (or at least using this user name, my gut feeling is you've been around with another user name) and you're opinion isn't of any consequence to me.


However your inability to simply type in BSC when trying to look cool and you couldn't even pull that off did bring a big smile to my face. Thanks.

When you've been on this site for a year or so, I may care what you think, until then you're just a newbie (or at least using this user name, my gut feeling is you've been around with another user name) and you're opinion isn't of any consequence to me. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

cliché count 2 - ad hominem

surprise surprise your gut feeling is also wrong.

well the NY judge in Trump's civil fraud case confirmed what we already knew: fraud is a feature not a bug in the Trump Org.'s business model. apparently, his assets may be seized by a receiver and auctioned off. the Trump Org business certification has been revoked. what do you all think of this new development?

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...151124791.html

is this the beginning of the end for Trump's NY real estate empire? maybe this whole presidency thing wasn't such a good idea after all for Trump? the NY AG asked for 250 million. maybe that's all Trump is worth, actually? and then, what, he uses only his political donations to keep paying his astronomical legal fees? will donors finally balk? Originally Posted by pxmcc

https://conservativebrief.com/das-ca...kfFxZbPJPlZ1l8

https://conservativebrief.com/das-ca...kfFxZbPJPlZ1l8 Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

Conservative Brief? Is that all you've got?

Conservative Brief? Is that all you've got? Originally Posted by MisterMeat

Even then, the article's logic seems to be that they attempted to pursue too many crooks too quickly. There might be a chance to stall here; I'm fairly certain this constitutes the entire defense, to be honest. They hope that Trump gets elected before the hammer falls, which would prevent his arrest or persecution while in office. This would provide him with four years to address these issues through alternative means.

Conservative Brief? Is that all you've got? Originally Posted by MisterMeat

ah no, I have a little something that may turn into a big something.


https://oversight.house.gov/release/...duct%EF%BF%BC/

ah no, I have a little something that may turn into a big something.


https://oversight.house.gov/release/...duct%EF%BF%BC/ Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

so where is the evidence? its always claim of evidence. their own witnesses told yesterday that there isn't evidence sufficient for impeachment. there's no evidence in this press release. i thought were promised explosive testimony that would seal the deal yesterday? what happened?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIAs8L8eQik


media was keen to jump about Obama enjoying djon mustard, how dare he. but now there is ton of evidence for impeachment and nada.

so where is the evidence? its always claim of evidence. their own witnesses told yesterday that there isn't evidence sufficient for impeachment. there's no evidence in this press release. i thought were promised explosive testimony that would seal the deal yesterday? what happened?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIAs8L8eQik


media was keen to jump about Obama enjoying djon mustard, how dare he. but now there is town of evidence for impeachment and nada. Originally Posted by OtherChevyGuy

You know, this reminds me of work. So myself and several other long time workers are having our morning cup of coffee and some new apprentice come up and sticks his nose in our business. So we pretend to be nice and listen, however he had no credibility and hadn't earned his rights to stick his nose in our long term debates. Pxmcc, nordic jag, and Mr. Meat sure don't need any help with their politics and making their points, they do just fine and even though I'm polar opposite of their side of politics, I still respect their points, remembering Voltaire.

maybe you should stick to arguing politics among your friends then, it seems you are not doing well in deeper waters.

since its not work i don't need your approval nor i need to pretend to want to be in your circle.


best of luck to you.