George Stephanopolis, Journalist, News Pundit.........Clinton Lackey?

We were all stunned years ago when ABC News hired George S as a news journalist. How in the heck could he be independent and objective knowing his position with the Clintons.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...on-207120.html

Of course, we all know that the major news media outlets don't won't independent and objective journalist. They want people who will be boot lickers and cheerleaders for the left wing/progressive/liberal agenda.

The biggest joke of all is how George says he gives to the Clintons because of all of the good work.........sure, when only 10 to 15% of every dollar is actually spent on the programs they represent. Give me a break.

Admitt it, Mr S. You are just another Democrat Lackey/Boot Licker. You should have given to The Salvation Army.

Yep.

We were all stunned years ago when ABC News hired George S as a news journalist. How in the heck could he be independent and objective knowing his position with the Clintons.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/...on-207120.html

Of course, we all know that the major news media outlets don't won't independent and objective journalist. They want people who will be boot lickers and cheerleaders for the left wing/progressive/liberal agenda.

The biggest joke of all is how George says he gives to the Clintons because of all of the good work.........sure, when only 10 to 15% of every dollar is actually spent on the programs they represent. Give me a break.

Admitt it, Mr S. You are just another Democrat Lackey/Boot Licker. You should have given to The Salvation Army. Originally Posted by Jackie S

You could say the same thing about any talking head on Fox. And your point would be?

Politifact also found your boy Rush's claim to be 'mostly false'. The Clinton Foundation is not a grant-making organization. They don't donate to other charities that then do the work. The work is done by the foundation itself. They do a lot of good work. Perhaps look at someone other than Fox or Rush to find out what they really do. You're never going to hear the whole truth from those sources. They want you to continue to be a boot licker lackey for them.

http://www.politifact.com/punditfact...-spends-just-/

http://theconservativetreehouse.com/...s/#more-100896

In Defense of George Stephanopoulos….

Posted on May 14, 2015 by sundance


♦ In 2009 nobody cared when ABC’s George Stephanopoulos participated in daily phone strategy sessions with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

♦ In 2011 nobody cared when ABC’s George Stephanopoulos oddly questioned Mitt Romney, during a presidential debate, about contraceptive coverage under insurance plans. An entire audience curiously looked at Stephanopolous trying to figure out where that came from. Then, like magic, a mysterious Democrat Party Platform evolved itself around a college student named Sandra Fluke and her demands for contraceptive coverage. Which famously evolved further into the 2012 WAR ON WOMEN narrative.

So why exactly is everyone now jaw agape at the revelations that ABC’s George Stephanopoulos gave $75,000 to Hillary Clinton’s foundation?



Let’s be reasonable, with 15 cents of every donated dollar actually going to “charitable endeavors”, the reality is: Stephanopolous gave $11,250 to the Clinton foundation, and bought $63,750 worth of planes, booze and hookers for Bill.







?

You could say the same thing about any talking head on Fox. And your point would be? Originally Posted by WombRaider

Funny how George was so wrapped up on the "Fact" that the author "worked for Bush".. why not raise the "FACT" that George worked for the Clintons?

Ahhh.. I forgot.. Hypocrisy is a fundamental part of being a liberal Democrat.

This shit is too funny. Are any of you surprised by this shit?

Its both sides. People with money buy influence and favors. People with influence sell it.

It will never stop. Us common folk are just cannon fodder. Fuck all of them.

Funny how George was so wrapped up on the "Fact" that the author "worked for Bush".. why not raise the "FACT" that George worked for the Clintons?

Ahhh.. I forgot.. Hypocrisy is a fundamental part of being a liberal Democrat. Originally Posted by RedLeg505

What are you even talking about?

If you think democrats have the market cornered on hypocrisy, you're just not paying attention.

What are you even talking about?

If you think democrats have the market cornered on hypocrisy, you're just not paying attention. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Didn't you just rant on about 'putting shit in other people's mouths"? Where did I say democrats have the market cornered on Hypocrisy?

HMMMM DICKWEED?????

I simply point out all the occasions when Democrats show their hypocrisy. Want to point out all the time Republicans do the same.. have at it.

Next time.. go sit on the toilet before you post.. shitbreath.

Politifact also found your boy Rush's claim to be 'mostly false'. Originally Posted by WombRaider

But then Politifact also found Odumbo's front man, Jay Carney, spoke "falsely" about 60% of the time, but since Politifact uses a very biased selection process regarding what it "analyzes" -- only select items and not 100% of what is said -- only a very stupid person like you, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, would purposely misrepresent the data Politifact publishes.

Funny how George was so wrapped up on the "Fact" that the author "worked for Bush".. why not raise the "FACT" that George worked for the Clintons?

Ahhh.. I forgot.. Hypocrisy is a fundamental part of being a liberal Democrat. Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Didn't you just rant on about 'putting shit in other people's mouths"? Where did I say democrats have the market cornered on Hypocrisy?

HMMMM DICKWEED?????

I simply point out all the occasions when Democrats show their hypocrisy. Want to point out all the time Republicans do the same.. have at it.

Next time.. go sit on the toilet before you post.. shitbreath. Originally Posted by RedLeg505

Right there, cock breath. And tell me, what good, exactly, does it do to point out these hypocrisies? I don't care. Pointing out hypocrisy is about as useful as a wet fart. It's the domain of the idiot. The only person keeping score is you...

But then Politifact also found Odumbo's front man, Jay Carney, spoke "falsely" about 60% of the time, but since Politifact uses a very biased selection process regarding what it "analyzes" -- only select items and not 100% of what is said -- only a very stupid person like you, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, would purposely misrepresent the data Politifact publishes. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

So when they're speaking about a democrat, you take them at their word. But on any other subject, they're lacking. Does that about sum it up? Go back in your hole.

So when they're speaking about a democrat, you take them at their word. But on any other subject, they're lacking. Does that about sum it up? Go back in your hole. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Not at all, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, just used Jay Carney to illustrate the inherent deficiency of misrepresenting Politifact's findings as you stupidly did.

Hi, Jack!

Way to shit in the punch bowl again, CORPY!

Not at all, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, just used Jay Carney to illustrate the inherent deficiency of misrepresenting Politifact's findings as you stupidly did. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Bullshit, you fallacious cunt. I didn't misrepresent anything. If there was a misrepresentation, it was theirs alone. I can only tell you what they said.

Hi, Jack!

Way to shit in the punch bowl again, CORPY! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It's your favorite drink, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, and everyone knew you would be here.

Bullshit, you fallacious cunt. I didn't misrepresent anything. If there was a misrepresentation, it was theirs alone. I can only tell you what they said. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You're the one lying and misrepresenting, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. PolitiFact clearly states its bias for selecting items for analysis, and you're the one who ignored their policy and misrepresented their findings with your lies, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:

Choosing claims to check

Every day, PolitiFact and PunditFact staffers look for statements that can be checked. We comb through speeches, news stories, press releases, campaign brochures, TV ads, Facebook postings and transcripts of TV and radio interviews. Because we can't possibly check all claims, we select the most newsworthy and significant ones. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...truth-o-meter/