Voter turnout...

Over the last eight years, political analysts had come to think that Democrats were at a distinct disadvantage in midterm elections, since their younger and nonwhite coalition was less likely to turn out than older and white voters.
It is time to retire that notion. Tuesday in Alabama, Democrats benefited from strong turnout that plainly exceeded midterm levels, while white working-class Republicans voted in weaker numbers. It was enough to send Doug Jones to the Senate instead of Roy Moore, in one of the reddest states in the country.
This has been a pattern in all of this year’s major special elections, as well as in the Virginia general election. It is consistent with a long-term trend toward stronger turnout by the party out of power in off-year elections. It also suggests that President Trump’s less educated and affluent version of the Republican coalition has eroded the party’s traditional turnout advantage.http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...z&ocid=U221DHP

copy some more boilerplate and see if you get more of a response

copy some more boilerplate and see if you get more of a response Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

I realized after posting it, it was way over most of you Monkey's capacity to decipher!

I have ever maintained that there is more of “us” than there are of “them.”

The anger of the left, however, is reaching critical mass and forcing a traditionally fractured voting group into a singleness if lirpose.

Not a good sign for the Turd Reich.

Lib-retards in the lame-stream media are spouting bullshit. In 2016, Trump received 1,318,255 popular votes, Moore only received 650,436 yesterday. hildebeest garnered 729,547 in 2016, and Jones only received 671,151. It's obvious to all but the most inebriated that Moore was taken down by an 11th hour WaPo hit piece, and the dim-retards picked up the crumbs.