PROOF: Obama Lied About Benghazi

An independent panel found numerous problems with embassy security, including the issues of funding which they stated led to State Department making choices based on savings rather than security. That part belongs to the Republicans. However, the report did support the notion that Obama lied about the cause of the attack, as we all well knew:

The report appeared to break little new ground about the timeline of the Benghazi attack during which Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens, information specialist Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods - who were contractors working for the CIA - were killed. Stevens' slaying was the first of a U.S. ambassador since 1988.

But it confirmed that contrary to initial accounts, there was no protest outside the consulate and said responsibility for the incident rested entirely with the terrorists who attacked the mission.

The report indicates that the Republicans are stupid, and that Obama is a liar. The rest of the article is here:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...12-18-21-20-30

Here we go again....

Cof is generally full of shit, and Ive got proof!

yadda yadda yadda

Here we go again....

Cof is generally full of shit, and Ive got proof! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Were you expecting another whitewash of the Obama administration? This was an independent investigation of this matter, not another case of the Obama administration investigating itself.

How about them Cowboys?

They are bigger chumps than their fans...

But I would admit that an all-Texas Super Bowl,would be nice. texans will get there, Jerry's kids are the longest of long shots... I like Washington right now,

Okay, I read that report and I wonder where you came up with the attack on the GOP. I know you claim to be independent but there was not date on when the Congress denied funds and the GOP was not in control the first two years when Hillary was SOS. I would like to see a date mentioned. I would also point out that when budgets get reduced you have to start making decisions on what is important. You have to weigh security in Benghazi with hybrid cars for everyone in Germany. In this case the hybrid cars won over security and that came from the State Department.

As for what the military could have done we need to know where the mobile assets (navy and marine) were located when the attack started. I did participate in the evacuation of Mogadishu, Somalia in 1991. I know how fast we responded and how far we could reach to help the embassy. From reports there was a destroyer within striking range of Benghazi. If a cruise missile could have reached Benghazi I think an S-3, CH-46, or a CH-53 could have come to the aid of the embassy in a few hours. A destroyer does not carry marines but they do carry a self defense force of sailors. 20-30 armed sailors and an orbiting helo with a minigun would have made a great deal of difference. We don't have all the information yet.

There is more to learn, but I was focusing on Obama's lie, which the usual suspects have ignored, predictably.

There is more to learn, but I was focusing on Obama's lie. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

There you have it folks, StupidOldFart doesn't want any competition.

No, he lives to point out lies, real or imagined, as best suits his personal agenda.

These aren't the actions of a mentally stable person. But those of a classic paranoid... The same characteristics displayed by postal workwear unable to cope with the stress of their position.

Expect the next senseless crime to come out of the closet in a dark basement in Wichita!

There is more to learn, but I was focusing on Obama's lie, which the usual suspects have ignored, predictably. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

from the article


It said the response by Diplomatic Security agents on the scene and CIA operatives at a nearby compound that later came under attack itself had been "timely and appropriate" and absolved the military from any blame. "There was simply not enough time for armed U.S. military assets to have made a difference," it said.
The report also discounted speculation that officials in Washington had refused appeals for additional help after the attack had begun.
"The Board found no evidence of any undue delays in decision making or denial of support from Washington or from the military combatant commanders," it said. To the contrary, the report said the evacuation of the dead and wounded 12 hours after the initial attack was due to "exceptional U.S. government coordination and military response" that helped save the lives of two seriously wounded Americans

An independent panel found numerous problems with embassy security, including the issues of funding which they stated led to State Department making choices based on savings rather than security. That part belongs to the Republicans. However, the report did support the notion that Obama lied about the cause of the attack, as we all well knew:

The report appeared to break little new ground about the timeline of the Benghazi attack during which Libyan Ambassador Chris Stevens, information specialist Sean Smith and former Navy SEALs Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods - who were contractors working for the CIA - were killed. Stevens' slaying was the first of a U.S. ambassador since 1988.

But it confirmed that contrary to initial accounts, there was no protest outside the consulate and said responsibility for the incident rested entirely with the terrorists who attacked the mission.

The report indicates that the Republicans are stupid, and that Obama is a liar. The rest of the article is here:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...12-18-21-20-30 Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

COG: Look in the mirror and you will see PROOF that there are low life POS Scum bags that are still walking the face of the earth.

COG: Look in the mirror and you will see PROOF that there are low life POS Scum bags that are still walking the face of the earth. Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

StupidOldFart has repeatedly shown himself to be a compulsive liar, who would lie even if the truth would help him! He has no credibility!

End of story!

Hell he is a bigger liar than Clinton.

Hell he is a bigger liar than Clinton. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Clinton lied hoping his wife would not find out about extramarital affairs. StupidOldFart lies because compulsive lying is in his DNA!