Libtards cause crime to surge

And the same libtards want to take away your ability to protect yourself by taking away your guns

This is their plan

Sky-high campaign donations from liberal anti-police billionaire George Soros and his groups have helped to elect 75 “social justice” prosecutors in whose cities jailings have plummeted and crime has surged according to a new report provided to Secrets.

In a 17-page report compiled by the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, a decade of spending has put Soros prosecutors in enough big cities that they represent 1 in 5 people, or about 72 million. That includes about half of America’s 50 most populous cities and counties where 40% of U.S. homicides occur.

Soros is a well-known proponent of social justice prosecution, which calls for lighter sentences, especially of minorities. The movement, however, has led to higher crime in some cities and has been decried by pro-law-and-order conservatives.

Police have led the charge against liberal prosecutors who have been refusing to file charges that lead to long prison sentences.

In a statement to Secrets, LELDF President Jason Johnson hit the Soros funding.

“Soros is using that campaign money and the hundreds of millions more for supporting organizations to quietly transform the criminal justice system for the worse, promoting dangerous policies and anti-police narratives to advance his radical agenda,” said Johnson.

He added, "Over the past decade, George Soros has spent $40 million to elect 75 of his chosen prosecutors. In campaigns from Houston and Los Angeles to Philadelphia and Orlando, Soros was the campaign's biggest spender by far — as much as 90% of the dollars spent in some races. Soros isn't done yet — he's already spent another million so far this year on his hand-picked district attorneys.”

Soros is well known in liberal donor circles as a supporter of the most liberal causes, including for groups advocating gun bans and defunding the police. That has made him a prime target of law enforcement groups.

The report found that many new district attorneys had little experience but the support of liberal donors such as Soros. What’s more, it said that as the social justice movement has grown, so has funding of district attorney political campaigns.

“Traditionally, elections for district attorney have been quiet affairs. Candidates spent very little on their campaigns, instead jockeying for local endorsements and burnishing their legal qualifications for the top job. That changed recently as millions of campaign dollars have flowed into these down ballot contests. The bulk of that lavish spending on advertising and consultants has been done by (or on behalf of) ‘social justice’ candidates,” said the report.

“In most of these free spending contests, progressive forces proved victorious by either defeating incumbent Democrats or crushing a field of primary contenders. Strikingly, most of these prosecutors were political neophytes and had zero prosecutorial experience — previously an assumed prerequisite for office. Many have no previous criminal case experience,” it added.

The report listed many of the groups that have used Soros's funding to elect prosecutors. And it lists the biggest winners of that money, including Chicago’s Kim Foxx, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, and Loudoun County, Virginia, Commonwealth Attorney Buta Biberaj.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...ce-prosecutors

You know how you prevent getting hit by a drunk driver? Ban all sober drivers from driving. That's gun control.


Crime goes up when times get tough. Times are tough right now. No doubt about it. They should make changes to the cause of the tough times. Not pointing out the effect while ignoring the cause. Protip: The people in congress who make a few hundred thousand a year plus millions in 'donations' are the cause

The washingtonexaminer... just like Faux news....lies, misleading, non-factual bullshit propaganda. Just like a lot of Twitter feeds. That's mostly all you post. No wonder your so angry and enraged. Spend your days filling your mind with bullshit and then regurgitating it on this site.

The washingtonexaminer... just like Faux news....lies, misleading, non-factual bullshit propaganda. Just like a lot of Twitter feeds. That's mostly all you post. No wonder your so angry and enraged. Spend your days filling your mind with bullshit and then regurgitating it on this site. Originally Posted by rmg_35

If u don't believe it, look on the government website....

The washingtonexaminer... just like Faux news....lies, misleading, non-factual bullshit propaganda. Just like a lot of Twitter feeds. That's mostly all you post. No wonder your so angry and enraged. Spend your days filling your mind with bullshit and then regurgitating it on this site. Originally Posted by rmg_35

I don't know, I have to disagree. Don't you get that strange, primal urge to shoot up a school whenever you see a picture of Biden or AOC? /s



Careful, you might get a point for attacking someone on an internet forum!

You know how you prevent getting hit by a drunk driver? Ban all sober drivers from driving. That's gun control.


Crime goes up when times get tough. Times are tough right now. No doubt about it. They should make changes to the cause of the tough times. Not pointing out the effect while ignoring the cause. Protip: The people in congress who make a few hundred thousand a year plus millions in 'donations' are the cause Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Why do you continue to make excuses for the libtard's actions? It is 100% factual Soros has spent huge sums of money getting soft on crime DA's elected. These incompetent DA's release criminals, refuse to prosecute many, etc all of which leads to increased crime and violence in their cities. It's a fact that in the cities where these Soros bought DAs are located, the number of people being jailed has dropped dramatically while crime has soared

Instead of crying about gun control - why not start by locking up all the criminal thugs that are out there now instead of putting them back out on the street? If you are serious about public safety, how can anyone support these Soros bought DAs who are making their cities less safe by the day?

If u don't believe it, look on the government website.... Originally Posted by chizzy

He could also look on ABC St Louis

https://abcstlouis.com/news/nation-w...voting-funding

or CBS Texas

https://kfdm.com/news/nation-world/r...voting-funding

or a number of other news sources. But some here just like to ignore the facts and throw stones.

Here is one example:

Nearly 98% of Los Angeles Prosecutors Vote to Recall Soros-backed District Attorney George Gascón

‘Gascón began a massive social experiment by redirecting prosecutorial resources away from enforcing the law’

By Katy Grimes, February 23, 2022 6:37 am

The 800 member Association of Deputy District Attorneys who work for the County of Los Angeles, just voted overwhelmingly to support the recall of George Gascón, the elected District Attorney of LA County.

According to the ADDA, 97.9% percent of the front-line prosecutors tasked with implementing DA Gascón’s policies voted for his recall. The vote came after Gascón refused an invitation to address the prosecutors of his office to explain and defend his policies and provide his arguments why he should not be recalled.

“This vote is by those who are intimately familiar with how Mr. Gascón’s policies actually play out on a day-to-day basis,” said ADDA President Michele Hanisee. “We believe the vote of our members will resonate with the voters of Los Angeles as they decide whether to recall Gascón from office and restore public safety as the priority of the District Attorney’s office,”

OH AND LOOK - GASCON JUST LET THIS CRIMINAL THUG OFF WITH 5 MONTHS OF CAMP TIME

Los Angeles District Attorney Gascon is a bloody monster. 5 months of diversion for the aspiring murderer doing this is beyond the pale.

"I thought those were the last moments of our lives, we were dead.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NciEH-kAtI

Here is another example - of the Soft On Crime Soros bought and paid for douchebag DA in Philly:

Is Krasner’s “Soft on Crime” Approach Working?

This year, 300 homicides were reported in Philadelphia more quickly than in any other year within the past several decades. The city is now on pace to break a record by surpassing 500 homicides by the end of the year. In fact, Philadelphia is currently America’s murder capital, with the highest per capita homicide rate among the country’s ten largest cities. Linked to this rise are growing rates of armed shootings, assaults, rapes, and robberies. The reality of an epidemic of violence is not up for debate; the solution, however, is.

Some hope to fund, expand, or create social programs and services for Philadelphians. Several elected officials claim that the problem should be officially deemed a “gun emergency.” Others call for new and stronger gun laws. However, these proposals are each flawed and ultimately distract from the only legitimate solution – District Attorney Larry Krasner doing his job.

The data shows that D.A. Krasner is taking a soft-on-crime stance. Under his administration, prosecutions of gun crime have plummeted even as arrests have soared. In the years before D.A. Krasner took office, 2014 to 2017, data from the Philadelphia district attorney’s office shows that the average number of dismissed or withdrawn firearms possession cases was 273 (2019). However, from 2018 to 2020 the average has shot up to 426. In 2021, with only three-fourths of the year having passed, the count of dismissed/withdrawn firearms possession cases sits at over 600. It is relatively the same for violent offenses: 2021’s number of dismissed or withdrawn cases for violent offenses is predicted to be the highest in years.

This has meant that violent offenders have faced lackluster prosecution. Moreover, guilty pleas have dropped fast under D.A. Krasner’s leadership, as the accused see a high chance of emerging unscathed from the courtroom. A reluctance from witnesses to step forward is an additional byproduct of this trend, as many may fear testifying against those who are likely to be let free.

Instead of accepting the truth and deciding to prosecute gun crime, D.A. Krasner is wildly throwing out accusations. He has blamed Pennsylvania’s Republican elected officials (and the NRA for backing them), proclaiming that he’s “surprised they don’t spend all day trying to make every gun legal.” While it’s true that a GOP majority has successfully pushed back against some progressive gun policies, the fact is that Pennsylvania’s gun laws are stricter than most other states. And in Philadelphia, they’re even more severe. For instance, a gun license is required to open carry. The main problem is not current gun laws – it is Krasner’s refusal to enforce the law.

more:

https://pennpoliticalreview.org/2021...roach-working/

Why do you continue to make excuses for the libtard's actions? It is 100% factual Soros has spent huge sums of money getting soft on crime DA's elected. These incompetent DA's release criminals, refuse to prosecute many, etc all of which leads to increased crime and violence in their cities. It's a fact that in the cities where these Soros bought DAs are located, the number of people being jailed has dropped dramatically while crime has soared

Instead of crying about gun control - why not start by locking up all the criminal thugs that are out there now instead of putting them back out on the street? If you are serious about public safety, how can anyone support these Soros bought DAs who are making their cities less safe by the day? Originally Posted by berryberry

Berry
It is incredibly hard to take you seriously when you link to news sources which are generally agreed upon by the greater world to be fear mongering news sites which tend to report on things that their audience would get angry over, while ignoring the entire other half of the spectrum.

Additionally, you often post links to telegram channels, which is in of itself a social media network created by Russians, with zero context.


No we aren't going to go to fox news to read a bullshit article that is mostly made up, that might have one line of fact in it, but the rest of it is just padding to make Reds angry. No we aren't going to install and join a telegram group to read a comment someone made there.


And finally, the volume of posts you make trying to get a reaction is.. not funny, but a little bit sad. It is almost like you want to get a genuine reaction out of people in the Pittsburgh forum, for whatever reason I can not fathom. I am perplexed how you are content to share (or spam, if we want to not sugar coat it) content in the Pittsburgh forum, but seem to avoid posting threads in the ECCIE national political forum. Afraid of something, maybe? https://eccie.net/forumdisplay.php?f=1701


So to answer your question, why do I continue to make excuses?
Firstly, I'm not immature enough to call anyone 'libtards'. We are all adults. There is no need to regress to calling people names akin to a school child.
Your 100% factual facts come from sources that even wikipedia refuses to acknowledge as reliable sources. So you haven't any sources for that.
You're blaming 'libtards' on crime. That's like blaming cars for car crashes - when it's the drivers fault. Oh I mean like blaming guns for gun violence, when it is the person firing the weapon's fault.

Crime isn't something that more police can solve. You remember reading about Berlin after the war? A giant wall with armed guards didn't stop the 'criminals' trying to escape. Only changing the overall picture stopped that. Crime is an effect of society. You can point to where the crime is and try to stop it, but it will come back like a fungus. The only true way to solve crime is to address it from the societal level.

If wages were higher, healthcare free-er, and people's standard of living higher, then people would not need to default to crime. Yes there are always outliers, but that's the general rule of thumb.

Want to understand how your right-wing friends can be so misinformed? Here's a primer from Matthew Sheffield, a former right-wing "consultant".

The biggest power that right-wing media has over its audiences is what it doesn't tell them about.

It's a very deliberate strategy that is frequently used to control what the GOP voter knows about.

While there are many true extremists who vote Republican, many of the party's voters are low-information people who actually think that Democrats are more extreme.

This position is nonsensical given that Democrats never sent a mob to kill the vice president. But if you are just a regular Republican who thinks the media are hopelessly liberally biased, you know almost nothing about 1/6. You don't know that it was filled with violent gang members, that many people had weapons, and that many have been charged with sedition.

You certainly don't know that literally every single one of the right-wing conspiracy theories about supposed voter fraud in 2020 have been totally debunked, or that the Trump campaign people didn't believe them either.

Right wing media never, ever talks about this stuff. Instead, what they talk about endlessly is how the Democrats are woke transsexual socialist communist fascists.

They also deliberately never talk about GOP controversies.

Right-wing media suppressed the story of Kevin McCarthy's admitting the obvious truth that Trump's people were the ones who led a mob to march on the Capitol.

They're doing the same thing now with Marge Greene's bigoted and ludicrous attacks on the Roman Catholic Church being supposedly under the control of Satan. This story is literally what everyone in GOP circles is talking about privately. But it's suppressed in right-wing media.

Fox News, Breitbart, Townhall, and Daily Wire, have all suppressed the Greene story entirely.

These same outlets, who constantly suppress stories about Republicans, also frequently turn around and accuse the mainstream media of suppressing stories, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story.

They ignore all the legit reasons why no one touched that one.

There are times when I believe the MSM has had a centrist Democratic bias, but it's light years removed from the constant bias that right-wing media exhibit daily. It was a huge reason why I stopped working in right wing media after creating two of its most popular sites.

Another example: On Monday, Phillip Bump reported that Fox anchor Sean Hannity asked Trump's then-chief of staff Mark Meadows for instructions on Election Day 2020 and dutifully replied "Yes sir, On it" after receiving them.

Hannity, who advised Trump on a daily basis and almost never disclosed the fact to viewers, is far from the only right-wing media figure with hidden conflicts of interest. Almost all of their outlets have staggering conflicts which they never disclose.

For instance, the Daily Wire was literally created in 2015 by Ted Cruz's top donors to flood the right-wing ecosystem with propaganda in support of his presidential run. They never disclosed it.

Many right-wing media outlets are also directly owned by churches or religious organizations seeking to steer Republican opinion in their direction:
��Epoch Times, Falun Gong
��Washington Times, Moonie cult
��AFR Radio, evangelical ministry
��Townhall, evangelical B2B

Many other right-wing media websites are directly owned or affiliated with political action committees who will "report" on candidates or legislation they lobby or spend on. Almost never do they disclose this information.

People in the mainstream press have talked endlessly about how there are "two different worlds" in politics. This is how the right-wing panopticon was built and how it keeps people in line to support Trump's every action and word.

Meanwhile, there are almost no advocacy media organizations on the political left to counterbalance the thousands of websites, radio, television, and web shows that exist on the right.

This is also deliberate. Democratic donors are dominated by antiquated consultants.

Democratic consultants have become obsessed with voter registration and finding new voters. They don't care much at all about staying in touch with or learning from people who are occasional voters.

Right-wing media does this for the GOP and it's profitable.

It's a lamentable fact that Democratic politics is utterly and totally dominated by a small cadre of extremely rich consultants who learned their trade in the 1980s and 90s. They think that placing an op-ed somewhere or making a video ad is a great triumph.

Right-wing media is the "secret sauce" that binds the entire GOP coalition together.

Democratic consultants think it's just a bunch of nonsense. Which it is. But it's so much worse.

Please share this thread & support me if you can. Someone needs to tell the truth.

Couldn't had said it better my self, rmg.

Here is a chart showing media bias. Some on here mostly post things that are skewed, hyper-partisan,extreme,unreliable, opinion,and/or propaganda. When you fill your days with this bullshit from either the right or left, you have a very tainted warped view of reality.

https://adfontesmedia.com/

Berry
It is incredibly hard to take you seriously when you link to news sources which are generally agreed upon by the greater world to be fear mongering news sites which tend to report on things that their audience would get angry over, while ignoring the entire other half of the spectrum.

Additionally, you often post links to telegram channels, which is in of itself a social media network created by Russians, with zero context.


No we aren't going to go to fox news to read a bullshit article that is mostly made up, that might have one line of fact in it, but the rest of it is just padding to make Reds angry. No we aren't going to install and join a telegram group to read a comment someone made there.

Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Please show me one single post of mine with a link to a Telegram Channel. Come on, I will wait

Please show me where all of the news sites I provide are "fear mongering news sites" Come on, I will wait

I post news from a vast variety of sites - CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, Breitbart, NY Post, WaPost, NY Times, Washington Examiner, the list goes on and on. You may not like one but that is on you for not being open minded. Different sites provide different prospectives.

But you and your fellow libs can't understand there are a multitude of news organizations. Your brains have been so corrupted by reading only DNC approved news sources that you don't know real facts when they are right in front of you

You probably still believe the Russia Hoax

The evidence is clear - Sky-high campaign donations from liberal anti-police billionaire George Soros and his groups have helped to elect 75 “social justice” prosecutors in whose cities jailings have plummeted and crime has surged

You and your fellow libs can't refute the facts so you try to change the subject and attack the source. Pathetic

Want to understand how your right-wing friends can be so misinformed? Here's a primer from Matthew Sheffield, a former right-wing "consultant".

The biggest power that right-wing media has over its audiences is what it doesn't tell them about.

It's a very deliberate strategy that is frequently used to control what the GOP voter knows about.

While there are many true extremists who vote Republican, many of the party's voters are low-information people who actually think that Democrats are more extreme.

This position is nonsensical given that Democrats never sent a mob to kill the vice president. But if you are just a regular Republican who thinks the media are hopelessly liberally biased, you know almost nothing about 1/6. You don't know that it was filled with violent gang members, that many people had weapons, and that many have been charged with sedition.

You certainly don't know that literally every single one of the right-wing conspiracy theories about supposed voter fraud in 2020 have been totally debunked, or that the Trump campaign people didn't believe them either.

Right wing media never, ever talks about this stuff. Instead, what they talk about endlessly is how the Democrats are woke transsexual socialist communist fascists.

They also deliberately never talk about GOP controversies.

Right-wing media suppressed the story of Kevin McCarthy's admitting the obvious truth that Trump's people were the ones who led a mob to march on the Capitol.

They're doing the same thing now with Marge Greene's bigoted and ludicrous attacks on the Roman Catholic Church being supposedly under the control of Satan. This story is literally what everyone in GOP circles is talking about privately. But it's suppressed in right-wing media.

Fox News, Breitbart, Townhall, and Daily Wire, have all suppressed the Greene story entirely.

These same outlets, who constantly suppress stories about Republicans, also frequently turn around and accuse the mainstream media of suppressing stories, such as the Hunter Biden laptop story.

They ignore all the legit reasons why no one touched that one.

There are times when I believe the MSM has had a centrist Democratic bias, but it's light years removed from the constant bias that right-wing media exhibit daily. It was a huge reason why I stopped working in right wing media after creating two of its most popular sites.

Another example: On Monday, Phillip Bump reported that Fox anchor Sean Hannity asked Trump's then-chief of staff Mark Meadows for instructions on Election Day 2020 and dutifully replied "Yes sir, On it" after receiving them.

Hannity, who advised Trump on a daily basis and almost never disclosed the fact to viewers, is far from the only right-wing media figure with hidden conflicts of interest. Almost all of their outlets have staggering conflicts which they never disclose.

For instance, the Daily Wire was literally created in 2015 by Ted Cruz's top donors to flood the right-wing ecosystem with propaganda in support of his presidential run. They never disclosed it.

Many right-wing media outlets are also directly owned by churches or religious organizations seeking to steer Republican opinion in their direction:
��Epoch Times, Falun Gong
��Washington Times, Moonie cult
��AFR Radio, evangelical ministry
��Townhall, evangelical B2B

Many other right-wing media websites are directly owned or affiliated with political action committees who will "report" on candidates or legislation they lobby or spend on. Almost never do they disclose this information.

People in the mainstream press have talked endlessly about how there are "two different worlds" in politics. This is how the right-wing panopticon was built and how it keeps people in line to support Trump's every action and word.

Meanwhile, there are almost no advocacy media organizations on the political left to counterbalance the thousands of websites, radio, television, and web shows that exist on the right.

This is also deliberate. Democratic donors are dominated by antiquated consultants.

Democratic consultants have become obsessed with voter registration and finding new voters. They don't care much at all about staying in touch with or learning from people who are occasional voters.

Right-wing media does this for the GOP and it's profitable.

It's a lamentable fact that Democratic politics is utterly and totally dominated by a small cadre of extremely rich consultants who learned their trade in the 1980s and 90s. They think that placing an op-ed somewhere or making a video ad is a great triumph.

Right-wing media is the "secret sauce" that binds the entire GOP coalition together.

Democratic consultants think it's just a bunch of nonsense. Which it is. But it's so much worse.

Please share this thread & support me if you can. Someone needs to tell the truth. Originally Posted by rmg_35

This has ZERO to do with the topic at hand. Because you know you can't refute the actual facts you try to change the subject. Quite pathetic but par for the course with you.

The topic is liberal anti-police billionaire George Soros and his groups have helped to elect 75 “social justice” prosecutors causing crime to surge. Stay on topic