the Darkest of Yellow Journalism

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/new...a-14818890.php

this is getting beyond absurd now.

"fiction" and "Coward" is appropriate nomenclature.

I've heard one too many Wolf cries. let's have an open, transparent and factual Impeachment inquiry, but leave this kind of shit behind.

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/new...a-14818890.php

this is getting beyond absurd now.

"fiction" and "Coward" is appropriate nomenclature.

I've heard one too many Wolf cries. let's have an open, transparent and factual Impeachment inquiry, but leave this kind of shit behind. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Let's put an end to the anonymous and un-named bullshit that can range from total hearsay to factual transparent information. This is the mindset that's spawned fake news.

Let's put an end to the anonymous and un-named bullshit that can range from total hearsay to factual transparent information. This is the mindset that's spawned fake news. Originally Posted by eccielover

yes.. we seem to be getting more comfortable with anonymous sources. this "Author" claims to be an Insider, and expects we will trust whatever is written, because he was there. that could be total fabrication. like the Kavanaugh Hearings, that the general public just moved on from, as if it was all so credible, but didn't succeed.

Joke one: Only a poster with a handle name of Chung Tran would dare headline a thread "the Darkest of Yellow Journalism".

Joke two: The subject of open and honest facts on an anonymous bulletin board is like Walter Cronkite writing for The Onion.

Joke three: Maybe yellow journalism should be rebranded brown journalism.


DNC Leaders Bury Heads In Hands After New Moderate Presidential Recruit Immediately Walks Into Oncoming Traffic

At press time, sources said an increasingly fed-up Perez had relented and told an aide to “just get fucking Bloomberg on the phone.”

CT- thanks for bringing this up - and accurately labeling.

Naturally the DPST's such as 9500 are uncomfortable having their propaganda unmasked as the politically slanted BS this garbage is. It is all they have in their stable of socialists and the infirm.


Quote from the article"
The author also ruminates about Trump's fitness for office, describing him as reckless and without full control of his faculties.
"I am not qualified to diagnose the president's mental acuity," the author writes. "All I can tell you is that normal people who spend any time with Donald Trump are uncomfortable by what they witness. He stumbles, slurs, gets confused, is easily irritated, and has trouble synthesizing information, not occasionally but with regularity. Those who would claim otherwise are lying to themselves or to the country."


My take is this describes Biden far more accurately than Trump!

Senility or socialism - that is what the DPST stable offers.



Why not read the article before One goes off on it - Hmmm 9500????

The "Official Impeachment Inquiry" was passed two weeks ago by party lines....

But Schitt is still having "behind closed door" questioning. Why?

CT- thanks for bringing this up - and accurately labeling.

Naturally the DPST's such as 9500 are uncomfortable having their propaganda unmasked as the politically slanted BS this garbage is. It is all they have in their stable of socialists and the infirm.


Quote from the article"
The author also ruminates about Trump's fitness for office, describing him as reckless and without full control of his faculties.
"I am not qualified to diagnose the president's mental acuity," the author writes. "All I can tell you is that normal people who spend any time with Donald Trump are uncomfortable by what they witness. He stumbles, slurs, gets confused, is easily irritated, and has trouble synthesizing information, not occasionally but with regularity. Those who would claim otherwise are lying to themselves or to the country."


My take is this describes Biden far more accurately than Trump!

Senility or socialism - that is what the DPST stable offers.



Why not read the article before One goes off on it - Hmmm 9500???? Originally Posted by oeb11

I don't need to read the article. I was commenting on the OP. Your bias is as acute as your vocabulary is small. Recurring theme in your presence on this forum: small.

I don't need to read the article. I was commenting on the OP. Your bias is as acute as your vocabulary is small. Recurring theme in your presence on this forum: small. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

The OP is a link to the article. To read only at face value what a poster references via their link is beyond absurd and uninformed.

But, never mind, that's the life a liberal/progressive.

Typical DPST , 9500 - presents their own version of another person's knowledge and intelligence as rationale for a point of view - and unable to defend it with other than blank waste of bandwidth and foolish memes.

uses that rationale to state he does not need to read an article to denounce it and its' OP.

.Nothing cogent or constructive - 9500 - but - I do believe you are smart enough to know that in your own mind.

Logical and debate Fail!!

The OP is a link to the article. To read only at face value what a poster references via their link is beyond absurd and uninformed.

But, never mind, that's the life a liberal/progressive. Originally Posted by eccielover

This is where you should have started your sentence. I just made it funny.

The title of the thread is about lurid yellow journalism. I had already judged THAT at face value. You missed the point.

The OP is about information that is so skewed it "is getting beyond absurd now." Why should I read it? Reading commentary about commentary is exponentially absurd. I don't negate Tran's OP. I only dismiss the article.

I'm sure the Chung-man gets it. I took it as a warning. "Do Not Read!" He warned us not to take it seriously. I only took his thread seriously. As seriously as I could of course.

Typical DPST , 9500 - presents their own version of another person's knowledge and intelligence as rationale for a point of view - and unable to defend it with other than blank waste of bandwidth and foolish memes.

uses that rationale to state he does not need to read an article to denounce it and its' OP.

.Nothing cogent or constructive - 9500 - but - I do believe you are smart enough to know that in your own mind.

Logical and debate Fail!! Originally Posted by oeb11

Little . . . little . . . man.

Is he talking about plantation politics again? Little man indeed. But not in stature, I can tell you. The man has no fackler!

https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/new...a-14818890.php

this is getting beyond absurd now.

"fiction" and "Coward" is appropriate nomenclature.

I've heard one too many Wolf cries. let's have an open, transparent and factual Impeachment inquiry, but leave this kind of shit behind. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

yes.. we seem to be getting more comfortable with anonymous sources. this "Author" claims to be an Insider, and expects we will trust whatever is written, because he was there. that could be total fabrication. like the Kavanaugh Hearings, that the general public just moved on from, as if it was all so credible, but didn't succeed. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Well! has there been a cosmic convergence along the plane of the galactic? have the stars aligned? it actually seems like everyone agrees these anonymous fictions are nothing more than political hit pieces hidden as factual snide .. er inside knowledge! well almost everyone .. there's always one goombah mamboolah to poop up a thread yeah?

Is he talking about plantation politics again? Little man indeed. But not in stature, I can tell you. The man has no fackler! Originally Posted by HoeHummer

DPST's have nothing but physical insults in response.

I would advise you to take a debate course - but it would not improve your discourse at all.

What a waste of oxygen and carbohydrates.

LOL

Yupper typical DPST response