Texas child abuse?

dilbert firestorm's Avatar
UPDATE: Texas Attorney General Calls For Child Abuse Investigation Into Mother of 'Transitioning' Son

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bronso...other-n2555378

Rand Paul Slams Letting Kids 'Choose' Gender: 'This Is Child Abuse'

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timoth...abuse-n2555349

been following this. this is an update from a previous thread posted a while back. this thread was where the father was prohibited in calling his son by his male name and using male pronouns by the court.

astonishingly, a texas jury voted to allow the mother to transition her son to female. something his father opposed.

the following day, the judge overturned the jury decision and awarded the father co-conservatorship with the mother on medical decisions for their son.

good. as that sex change op sounds like child abuse. there are some who agree.

It looks like texas child protective service is aware of the issue and have not launched an investigation. were they intending to let this slide?
Sounds like a case of genital mutilation that is literally on "steroids".
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-28-2019, 06:04 AM
#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.


You right wing posters are so worried about Gorilla nuts that you've forgotten all the other rules.

#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.


You right wing posters are so worried about Gorilla nuts that you've forgotten all the other rules.
Originally Posted by WTF
Seems to me this case was about parental rights and no mention of underage sex was made. But carry on Mister Mod.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-28-2019, 07:55 AM
Seems to me this case was about parental rights and no mention of underage sex was made. But carry on Mister Mod. Originally Posted by eccielover
Really....then why does the thread topic say "Texas Child Abuse''?





UPDATE: Texas Attorney General Calls For Child Abuse Investigation Into Mother of 'Transitioning' Son



It looks like texas child protective service is aware of the issue and have not launched an investigation. were they intending to let this slide? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Really....then why does the thread topic say "Texas Child Abuse''?

Originally Posted by WTF
Let's see. Parental rights would obviously have a reference to a child involved.

Your poor attempts at becoming the mod of this forum and obvious anger at your own violations are becoming sad and boring.

But I understand, you get your ass kicked by Trumpsters on a daily basis. You gotta have something to placate yourself with as a sort of vengeance. Enjoy the hate man. Chuck on the other hand usually fought for the "right".

We'll be laughing daily at the insanity of it.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-28-2019, 08:47 AM
Let's see. Parental rights would obviously have a reference to a child involved.

. Originally Posted by eccielover
dilbert linked it to a 7 year old child...maybe he will rtm it for a ruling like he did those forbidden Gorilla nuts!


#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.


WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-28-2019, 08:51 AM
Seems to me this case was about parental rights and no mention of underage sex was made. But carry on Mister Mod. Originally Posted by eccielover
This topic regards children. There would be no topic without a child involved. Had dilbert not referenced a specific case....quite possibly you could make an argument that it is not against the rules. However....if you click on his link it provides ages and details. It has Child Abuse in the topic title.






#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range
  • oeb11
  • 10-28-2019, 10:07 AM
Troll- please RTM to a real Mod.

They have the privilege of deciding if a topic is unsuitable per the Rules
NOT WTF - it is delusional in thinking itself a Mod.



Transgender,and babies with ambiguous genitalia - are a complex psychological/medical issue - each patient is different and requires in depth and time consuming evaluation and care. Most important in the care is not to administer or perform irreversible treatments to young patients in whom gender assignment is not clear or may change. Texas child is caught between two parents battling a divorce with child as a pawn. However the divorce turns out - the child needs its' own legal advocate for the child's best interests and to not undergo hormone therapy or mutilating irreversible gender assignment surgery as a young child without the ability to give a reasoned adult informed consent.



The Troll may RTM my post Now.
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Troll- please RTM to a real Mod.

They have the privilege of deciding if a topic is unsuitable per the Rules
NOT WTF - it is delusional in thinking itself a Mod.



Transgender,and babies with ambiguous genitalia - are a complex psychological/medical issue - each patient is different and requires in depth and time consuming evaluation and care. Most important in the care is not to administer or perform irreversible treatments to young patients in whom gender assignment is not clear or may change. Texas child is caught between two parents battling a divorce with child as a pawn. However the divorce turns out - the child needs its' own legal advocate for the child's best interests and to not undergo hormone therapy or mutilating irreversible gender assignment surgery as a young child without the ability to give a reasoned adult informed consent.



The Troll may RTM my post Now. Originally Posted by oeb11