"It's really easy to fix this if they would just get over the politics of who is going to win the '18 election."
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compa...z&ocid=U221DHP
I wish he'd tell us all how to fix it!
"It's really easy to fix this if they would just get over the politics of who is going to win the '18 election."He also said single payer won't work. He also said the Feds money goes to help people pay their premiums. That means an entitlement not to mention the expansion of Medicaid. So he wants more money. Of course he does. Does the ACA doe anything to control what HC providers charge? Do they publish their pricing? No. They just hand you a bill. They don't compete. Maybe that genius should go to the Hill and propose a fix. I bet it would include more money from the Feds.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compa...z&ocid=U221DHP
I wish he'd tell us all how to fix it! Originally Posted by WTF
He also said single payer won't work. He also said the Feds money goes to help people pay their premiums. That means an entitlement not to mention the expansion of Medicaid. So he wants more money. Of course he does. Does the ACA doe anything to control what HC providers charge? Do they publish their pricing? No. They just hand you a bill. They don't compete. Maybe that genius should go to the Hill and propose a fix. I bet it would include more money from the Feds. Originally Posted by bambinoYeah, the industry isn't really setup to make them compete.
I wonder what percent hospital charges and what percent GP charges account for the total billed amount to insurers? Originally Posted by greanProbably on an average of about 25% what is actually invoiced. The insured really ought to look at the billings by their providers, and most particularly hospitals. They charge you for shit you don't get and it's marked up sometimes 300%. The other game is "billing codes" ... They will end up assigning 2-3 and sometimes 4 billing codes to the same procedure to boost the invoicing to the carrier.
"It's really easy to fix this if they would just get over the politics of who is going to win the '18 election."So a CEO says you can't repeal it, so move on.. And we are supposed to take HIM seriously??
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compa...z&ocid=U221DHP
I wish he'd tell us all how to fix it! Originally Posted by WTF
"Chairman and CEO Mark Bertolini received $41 million in compensation last year, with $38.2 million of the package due to gains in value on restricted stock granted from 2013 to 2015 and on stock options he was awarded 10 years earlier and exercised during 2016.Poor guy.
"The total was up from $27.9 million in 2015."
http://www.courant.com/business/conn...411-story.html
He must speak the truth. Looks how much he makes!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover
"It's really easy to fix this if they would just get over the politics of who is going to win the '18 election."He (Britoni) already has. He wants the ACA law changed slightly so that health insurance plans can have up to 7 or 8 minimum benefits for people who are younger and less risky. The current ACA law is all health insurance plans (policy) must have the 10 minimum benefits. These types of policies would be cheaper and would encourage younger people to buy them. This would lead to more balanced risk pools. The link was posted several month ago. Don't have time to look for it now.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compa...z&ocid=U221DHP
I wish he'd tell us all how to fix it! Originally Posted by WTF
Poor guy. Originally Posted by bambinoGroup health insurance is quite profitable. The insurance risk pools are balanced for that market. Don't forget Aetna is only selling health insurance in about 7 states on the "government exchanges". Britoni took Aetna out of most states after the first year because the risk pools were not balanced.