For once we agree.
One presumes that they know more about the comparative risks than we do. Originally Posted by TexTushHog
I can see it both ways. More helicopters, more targets, more to go wrong, higher profile, greater chance of being seen.They didn't go in Bin Laden's compound with only one heli. Never assume the military is making the best decisions. Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti military, on the contrary, I fully support them. I just think when a mistake is made whoever was responsible should be held accountable, without using any scapegoats. I know mistakes happen in "the heat of battle" but this was going to the battle. Hope we , they, learned something from this.
Fewer helicopters, higher price is something does go wrong.
One presumes that they know more about the comparative risks than we do. Originally Posted by TexTushHog
They didn't go in Bin Laden's compound with only one heli. Never assume the military is making the best decisions. Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti military, on the contrary, I fully support them. I just think when a mistake is made whoever was responsible should be held accountable, without using any scapegoats. I know mistakes happen in "the heat of battle" but this was going to the battle. Hope we , they, learned something from this. Originally Posted by JohnBoyjrhI thought I read that this was the return flight from the engagement. In any case, doesn't really matter. I'm sure the incident will be reviewed and will influence future missions appropriately.