massage not hooking?

Recently dr Phill interviewed a young girl who advertised body rubs and contends this is not prostitution because she only uses her hands to create a happy ending and since she does not allow penetration of her body this is a legal profession
even though she is not licensed,your thoughts,comments!

A handjob is considered sex afaic.

A handjob is considered sex afaic. Originally Posted by Dick Guzinya

it maybe considered, but ITS NOT !!!!

In New York, it is a misdemeanor to give a hand job but a felony to give a massage without a license.

In New York, it is a misdemeanor to give a hand job but a felony to give a massage without a license. Originally Posted by BishopJohn

That is actually really funny …. so much for using massage to get around the legal aspect. Oh my.

There are so many types of sex workers. I consider body rub girls sex workers but not prostitutes. Also, she's a moron if she thinks that's legal.

I bet I can find an ex president that can tell you that getting a blowjob isn't sexual relations either....
depending of course on what your definition of "is" is....
His cunt wife didn't give it a second thought anyways....

Its called denial.

If you're more than 50 miles from home....it doesn't count!...

In New York, it is a misdemeanor to give a hand job but a felony to give a massage without a license. Originally Posted by BishopJohn

That is why they call it a body rub and not a massage.

In New York, it is a misdemeanor to give a hand job but a felony to give a massage without a license. Originally Posted by BishopJohn

What he said.

I knew I guy that thought as long as the girl kept both feet on the floor while giving a "massage", it was legal. Wish that was true......I enjoy standing doggie

Its called denial. Originally Posted by ElleW

I agree Ellie and so does dr Phill as well as the girls parents, her bf/pimp posts her ads and gets most of her funds in return for her room & board , he argues the fact that since no orfice on her body accepts penile penetration she is in the same category as a hair dresser or any other "hands on" professional , in retort dr Phill says "my hair dresser if I had hair wouldn't wear a skimpy bikini to work"!

geeze wonder if titty fucking fits the no penetration rule!

I agree Ellie and so does dr Phill as well as the girls parents, her bf/pimp posts her ads and gets most of her funds in return for her room & board , he argues the fact that since no orfice on her body accepts penile penetration she is in the same category as a hair dresser or any other "hands on" professional , in retort dr Phill says "my hair dresser if I had hair wouldn't wear a skimpy bikini to work"! Originally Posted by lickidyclit

Bad denial.

A hair dresser has an education/licence honey. Hair school isnt even about cutting hair so much.. its bacteriology, bones, skin, etc. Like nursing school. I didn't learn how to cut hair till my the 2nd year of the program. Ok a bit OT there! LOL

I obviously see nothing wrong with sex work, Im here, as long as its consenting adults but, I call it what it is and know what I do! LOL