Newsweek Has Kamala Harris Most Likely to Get Democratic Nomination in 2020?

https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-2020...p-will-1240612

looks like it, according to their analytical tools.. I said 4 weeks ago the ticket could (and should) be Harris at the top, with Beto O'Rourke as her running mate. forget about Warren, Sanders, Biden, Clinton, and anyone over 60.

I have Beto in the mix....as much as I do not like Harris, I can see where some may think she is electable. I'm not one of them.

She came across a really cunty bitch in the Matt Kavanagh Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-2020...p-will-1240612

looks like it, according to their analytical tools.. I said 4 weeks ago the ticket could (and should) be Harris at the top, with Beto O'Rourke as her running mate. forget about Warren, Sanders, Biden, Clinton, and anyone over 60. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

I see that but flipped with her as Beto's VP. I only say that because of all the cash the DNC spent on him.

Why are we even talking about something 2 years away? Weren't several other threads opened about this topic?

BTW, Newsweek. Progressives don't even use it as a source.

https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-2020...p-will-1240612

looks like it, according to their analytical tools.. I said 4 weeks ago the ticket could (and should) be Harris at the top, with Beto O'Rourke as her running mate. forget about Warren, Sanders, Biden, Clinton, and anyone over 60. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

I'm afraid that is age discrimination, and is not tolerable in America my friend.

Fuck Kamala Harris and Beto the little Bitch Boy.

https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-2020...p-will-1240612

looks like it, according to their analytical tools.. I said 4 weeks ago the ticket could (and should) be Harris at the top, with Beto O'Rourke as her running mate. forget about Warren, Sanders, Biden, Clinton, and anyone over 60. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

[redacted]

as far as kamala ......- the "perception" of ICE being like the KKK defeats her

if its not her "perception" but just some incorrect perception out there, then why isn't it her duty to clear that perception away and inform all those with the misperception the error of their perception?

oh because it is her perception.....but she was too chicken to say so

why not the leftists running Alec Baldwin and Rosie O ? now that would be some debate

why not the leftists running Alec Baldwin and Rosie O ? Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Trump could dump Pence and have Rodman as his running mate.

That would be an appropriate match

Trump/Rodman vs. Baldwin/Rosie

that is how far our politics have devolved.

Trump could dump Pence and have Rodman as his running mate.

That would be an appropriate match

Trump/Rodman vs. Baldwin/Rosie

that is how far our politics have devolved. Originally Posted by WTF

not Rodman ----kanye

not Rodman ----kanye Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

Good point, Rodman can be Secretary of State and deal with North Korea

Kamala Harris comes accross as about as likable as Hillary Clinton.

I see that but flipped with her as Beto's VP. I only say that because of all the cash the DNC spent on him. Originally Posted by grean

either scenario works for me. I feel like Harris would be stronger at the top, garnering female and minority support.. and she has a better basis to run for President. maybe DNC money would flow to her, with Beto on the ticket?

I'm afraid that is age discrimination, and is not tolerable in America my friend.

except at Dallas AMPs

Fuck Kamala Harris and Beto the little Bitch Boy. Originally Posted by friendly fred

you're a big fan of both, I take it?

Kamala Harris comes accross as about as likable as Hillary Clinton. Originally Posted by Jackie S

I think Kamala's public perception is largely limited to the pointed questions about ICE perception, and Kavanaugh's Supreme Court questions. people don't like "tough" in a woman, a minority woman especially.


but she's a lot more than that, and I think people will get over the narrow definition they have of her.

either scenario works for me. I feel like Harris would be stronger at the top, garnering female and minority support.. and she has a better basis to run for President. maybe DNC money would flow to her, with Beto on the ticket?



you're a big fan of both, I take it?



I think Kamala's public perception is largely limited to the pointed questions about ICE perception, and Kavanaugh's Supreme Court questions. people don't like "tough" in a woman, a minority woman especially.


but she's a lot more than that, and I think people will get over the narrow definition they have of her. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Good point about the Dallas AMPS - they need to limit the number of 50 year old plus providers!!

I don't know why people like Kamala Harris, though. Other than being the fashionable sex and color, what has she done without the help of the power of the government?

, what has she done without the help of the power of the government? Originally Posted by friendly fred

You could ask that about current politicians who have used the bankruptcy courts to their advantage.

As WTF stated earlier, Ms Harris "came across as a really cunty bitch in the Matt Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation hearings" ..... sounds like she's a carbon copy of HiLIARy, so I'm guessing that's good for about 65 million votes, give or take a few ..... and some may think Ms Harris isn't electable, but that's exactly how many viewed Trump in 2016 ..... but a nasty "cunty bitch" might be exactly what the Libturds want to throw at Trump ..... and when you throw that fake Mexican socialist onto the ticket, how could she lose? .....