"If law enforcement has a legitimate need to surveil, let them surveil," Schumer told The Associated Press, adding, "you can make sure privacy is protected."
What planet is he living on???.....If this legislation passes, it's just gonna be another area in which our expectations to privacy are being slowly eroded and big brother is slowly but surely watching everything you do and say.....I have no problem with combating terrorism and the police, as well as society in general, fighting crime.....BUT I do have a problem with them doing it at the expense of Constitutional freedoms.....America is supposed to be AMERICA because we're supposed to have a SUPREME DOCUMENT that protects our citizens against an overreaching gov't intent upon encroaching upon our freedoms and disrespecting our rights.....Or at least that's the ideals that our Founding Fathers espoused when they signed that famous Declaration, fought that war to be free of European oppression, and drafted that Constitution to govern our newfound nation lo those many years ago.....
"The Supreme Court has always upheld the principle that you have the right to speak anonymously - that the decision to identify yourself as a speaker is an aspect of speech itself," said Lee Tien, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
Yeah, while that may have been the case at one time in our nation's history, I feel that over the last 30+ years that ideal and philosophy has pretty much gone by the wayside.....And, anything that hasn't already been stripped away from us thus far will be taken away within a matter of a few years.....The feds and states are using that Homeland Security Act as justification to trample all over the rights of American citizens ostensibly under the guise of "combating terrorism and making America a safer nation within which to live".....The truth is that while that goal sounds quite noble (and let's face it, NONE of us should really argue about the intent), the facts remain that the HSA has really done nothing but be a pain in the ass to American citizens (and especially those who are trying to travel), has not really had much effect on slowing down terrorism and/or crime, and even if this legislation does pass, it will have almost ZERO effect on helping them track down the so called targets of terrorism.....If Shazad had shown his ID and purchased a prepaid phone, how would that have aided the feds in stopping him from using the phone to purchase the vehicle???.....He purchases the vehicle, then tosses the phone and the feds are in no better position to combat his criminal activity than they would have been had he not been required to show an ID.....Thus, the law is quite impotent in this case.....
"We are living in a time when unfortunately our public safety requires small gives by everyone," Verizon spokesman Jeffrey Nelson said.
But answer just one question for me: "Why is it always the regular, everyday, law abiding, average American citizen that is having to make the small gives???