NBC of all people claims Senile Biden plans to illegibly restrict free speech online even more than they have already done so

These fucking Democrats hate you, the US constitution and your right to free speech

NBC claims Senile Biden plans to further engage in social media control and conversation monitoring in response to embarrassing classified doc leak.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nat...ord-rcna79404?

Glenn Greenwald:

It is indescribably shocking and sickening that the nation's two largest media outlets were the ones who did the FBI's work and hunted for the leaker and outed him.

But what they did at the Pentagon was only slightly less gross. (supporting / pushing for the government to censor free speech)

And?


There is no law or higher power that is forcing you to use social media. You have the option to switch to any social media replacement, be it open source, decentralized, on the TOR network, or operated out of another country.



If people are so up in arms about how downhill the government is, why don't rightists forfeit their citizenship and apply for citizenship in another country which is better focused on your views?


That statement is true for the leftists too. If they believe the government is so corrupt and doesn't align to their views, why don't they do something about it, or leave?

And?


There is no law or higher power that is forcing you to use social media. You have the option to switch to any social media replacement, be it open source, decentralized, on the TOR network, or operated out of another country.
Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Sad that you apparently don't understand the meaning of

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Sad that you apparently don't understand the meaning of

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Originally Posted by berryberry

The First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech applies to government action and does not directly apply to private entities or individuals. This means that private companies, such as privately-owned internet sites, are generally free to regulate speech on their platforms as they see fit, without necessarily being bound by the requirements of the First Amendment.

The First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech applies to government action and does not directly apply to private entities or individuals. This means that private companies, such as privately-owned internet sites, are generally free to regulate speech on their platforms as they see fit, without necessarily being bound by the requirements of the First Amendment. Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

Again, it is really sad that you don't understand how the First Amendment's protection works.

NBC claims Senile Biden plans to further engage in social media control