Is going bushless a fetish or a choice?

Just curious......and I don't want to hijack the other thread!

As a woman, would you go bushless by choice, or do you do so because you are a provider?

As a man, is your desire for hairless ladies a kink or not? And does it really matter how much bush is there?

In JB's words.......discuss.......



elg........

I knew a NON provider 25 years ago who shaved because she thought she was cleaner.

If I were still with her and I showed her this...
She'd probably say:

fuckin elg....

woman grow bush

save the crabs
save the crabs
save the crabs
save the crabs



















the many years of stuff to kill crabs
It is strange that with women going trimmed or hardwood floor
crabs are now a endangered species

Fewer hairballs

Just curious......and I don't want to hijack the other thread!

As a woman, would you go bushless by choice, or do you do so because you are a provider?

As a man, is your desire for hairless ladies a kink or not? And does it really matter how much bush is there?

In JB's words.......discuss.......



elg........ Originally Posted by elghund

As a provider, I trim the front bush and keep a clear landing strip.

The clear landing strip seems to be the popular preference for men who daty - regardless if it is of a professional nature or other. (From what I am told)

In a personal relationship, I enjoy an occasional 1 to 2 days of free hair growth at the landing strip. It seems good for my body and makes me feel a certain way. Not too often, though. Just an occasional.

I trim to keep a clean looking hair cut -regardless of provider or non professional nature. The unruly long curls drive me nuts. A bit to play with and caress is nice (really nice if you ask me) as long as it doesn't pull while caressing

I always keep my bush shaped. Definitely my choice- regardless of who likes what. Too much area of bush is just too much to turn me on. On anybody or me.

When approached with a request for bushy, I typically shape, do not trim, and skip a day or two for the strip. I personally believe this is a person's preference, not kink or fetish, and I try to accommodate such.

As far as totally bare- well, I don't offer that anymore. I have years in the past, and it seems that men who are attracted to that just don't fit my personality preference. I just can't get into it.

As far as daty for me, I have always preferred freshly shaven or over 24 hours and less than 36 hours since a shave to be able to enjoy it.

Now, as far as the gents are concerned, dry trimming with a trimmer is appreciated, but please make sure to do that before a shower. Not too short- I like to feel a little shocking fur... If you are bare, that's cool, too, but less desired for longer rolls in the hay. My preference for the lickable sacks? Trimmed or bare. Now, as far as the tree itself, if there are hairs, please take care of them. I haven't yet defined if they add to an orgasm, but I do know they take away from a good blow job.

As a provider, I trim the front bush and keep a clear landing strip.

The clear landing strip seems to be the popular preference for men who daty - regardless if it is of a professional nature or other. (From what I am told)

In a personal relationship, I enjoy an occasional 1 to 2 days of free hair growth at the landing strip. It seems good for my body and makes me feel a certain way. Not too often, though. Just an occasional.

I trim to keep a clean looking hair cut -regardless of provider or non professional nature. The unruly long curls drive me nuts. A bit to play with and caress is nice (really nice if you ask me) as long as it doesn't pull while caressing

I always keep my bush shaped. Definitely my choice- regardless of who likes what. Too much area of bush is just too much to turn me on. On anybody or me.

When approached with a request for bushy, I typically shape, do not trim, and skip a day or two for the strip. I personally believe this is a person's preference, not kink or fetish, and I try to accommodate such.

As far as totally bare- well, I don't offer that anymore. I have years in the past, and it seems that men who are attracted to that just don't fit my personality preference. I just can't get into it.

As far as daty for me, I have always preferred freshly shaven or over 24 hours and less than 36 hours since a shave to be able to enjoy it.

Now, as far as the gents are concerned, dry trimming with a trimmer is appreciated, but please make sure to do that before a shower. Not too short- I like to feel a little shocking fur... If you are bare, that's cool, too, but less desired for longer rolls in the hay. My preference for the lickable sacks? Trimmed or bare. Now, as far as the tree itself, if there are hairs, please take care of them. I haven't yet defined if they add to an orgasm, but I do know they take away from a good blow job.

Originally Posted by SweetElizabeth

My preference would be neatly trimmed or a landing strip. Part of the attraction for me is the visual of a neatly groomed lady. It is a real turn on knowing that the lady takes the time to prepare herself, and is in touch enough with herself to do so regularly.

I dated a lady once who was shaved. It just felt weird to me.......I was borderline between feeling that something was missing or something was wrong. And, for me, stubble just doesn't cut it. And, there were more days of stubble than smooth..........and, I have seen a few providers, who advertise hair free, but never mention that stubble is the norm.

I don't manscape myself, but after your thoughts, Liz, I may consider it! Lol!

elg......

Hard to say it's a fetish when the poll said the majority prefer it. Sounds main stream to me. I started shaving a couple years ago too and seems more hygienic to me.

Just prefer over all bald, but, if she has a landing strip that's fine also, so long as it's not 70's porno. Liz the way you describe yourself it would be perfect!
Same here, been scaping for many years now, just prefer it overall, feels better.

My preference would be neatly trimmed or a landing strip. Part of the attraction for me is the visual of a neatly groomed lady. It is a real turn on knowing that the lady takes the time to prepare herself, and is in touch enough with herself to do so regularly.

I dated a lady once who was shaved. It just felt weird to me.......I was borderline between feeling that something was missing or something was wrong. And, for me, stubble just doesn't cut it. And, there were more days of stubble than smooth..........and, I have seen a few providers, who advertise hair free, but never mention that stubble is the norm.

I don't manscape myself, but after your thoughts, Liz, I may consider it! Lol!

elg...... Originally Posted by elghund

Please do remember to leave enough for the stroking from the special part of the woman's fingertips...

I prefer hair. To me a "bush" is what the norm was in the 70's. I think neatly trimmed and sparse is nice. I refer to that as wispy. A nice triangle shape or heart shape is sexy but girls have told me that shaping/maintaining it is serious work.

How many of you older guys, like me, can remember seeing a woman in a swimsuit and you just knew she had a jungle bush because her swimsuit was all puffed out? In a way, it was a little bit sexy!

I started a thread on this topic last September. Lots of good responses. One provider I saw a few weeks later said she remembered this thread and grew her hair in just for me!

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...822&highlight=

I think "bush" is the fetish now... and shaved is the norm.

I think "bush" is the fetish now... and shaved is the norm. Originally Posted by doctorisin

I agree with this. And I'm one of the ones who like Bush.

Never thought bush or bushless a fetish.
Always preferred a bald beaver finding it more sexy, cleaner, more hygienic, plus crabs have no place to nest....

I think all girls should get lasered, like Erica Hall. Landing strips make no sense to me. And stubble is worse. Bald is just the new normal. I laugh every time I hear Melanie Griffith say she won't shave her pussy in the movie "Body Double".