Should The "Goodbye Joe" Thread Have Been Closed?

The "Goodbye Joe" thread was recently closed by a moderator. It was a popular thread that discussed somthing that everybody around watercoolers is talking about.

I think the thread should have not been closed. I am curious what are the opinions of others at ECCIE.

Shoulda been closed a week ago! LOL

Hot damn, first time I have ever been accused of protecting rapist!

Seriously, I doubt they care what we think and no I not one for closing threads.

It is their board, they can close wtf they want , when they want to.

Rape isn't one of the forbidden topics (I don't think).

Rape isn't one of the forbidden topics (I don't think). Originally Posted by Whirlaway

A 11-12 y.o. was involved.

A 11-12 y.o. was involved. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Well honestly I was surprised the thread was allowed to stay open so long given the rules on topics of kids and sex.

So not surprising that they did finally close it. Don't be surprised if this thread gets closed..lol

I've never read it, did I miss something?

I guess Munchmasterman is taunting the mods to close this thread -- his post wasn't necessary to discuss the topic!

Mods; please close....thanks munchmasterman.

I've never read it, did I miss something? Originally Posted by waverunner234

WTF posted in it more than forty times, so the answer is "no".

WTF posted in it more than forty times, so the answer is "no". Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Creepy, isn't it?

Close the Bachmann/Unemployed/Starve thread.

WTF posted in it more than forty times, so the answer is "no". Originally Posted by chicagoboy

I was accused of protecting rapists. So no Much did not miss anything, he was not accused of that.

Nobody asked you to post in it, yet you did. Earth shaking posts I might add.

The "Goodbye Joe" thread was recently closed by a moderator. It was a popular thread that discussed somthing that everybody around watercoolers is talking about.

I think the thread should have not been closed. I am curious what are the opinions of others at ECCIE. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You thought it was OK to post the content of PMs. "Joe" had at least 1 child involved, DB.
See my rule of thumb hence to be called "whirlaways whirld peas"

I guess Munchmasterman is taunting the mods to close this thread -- his post wasn't necessary to discuss the topic!

Mods; please close....thanks munchmasterman. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

For the rule of thumb title? For pointing out the reason the other thread was closed?

Shucks, since both were clear as the point on your head, I cain't take no credit a-tall!

Mods: Please don't close whirlys thread. It's all the little chucklehead has to live for. Since the terminal degeneration of the brain set in, he's only got till Christmas.


(Psssst. After that, do what you want with it)

Yes!! i demand that the thread be re-opened so that we all can continue to post vindictive diatribes about yesterday's news! NOT.

as many know i was one of the most ardent supporters of Joe Paterno and even i'm losing interest in this brawl of words with no end in sight. Or no simple answers either. Time to let it go.

and the way THIS thread is going maybe this one should be closed too.
we can all "agree to disagree" on the subject but there's no point an any thread that degrades into a "word brawl"

The "Goodbye Joe" thread was recently closed by a moderator. It was a popular thread that discussed somthing that everybody around watercoolers is talking about.

I think the thread should have not been closed. I am curious what are the opinions of others at ECCIE. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I appreciate your comments, but its going to remain closed for the reasons stated.

A 11-12 y.o. was involved. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Well honestly I was surprised the thread was allowed to stay open so long given the rules on topics of kids and sex.

So not surprising that they did finally close it. Don't be surprised if this thread gets closed..lol Originally Posted by Guilty Pleasures

It should NOT have been closed (will go back and read the mod's reason if there is one).

IMHO, it wasn't about the raping of minors so much as it was about current events. And even then, the "minors" discussed are now adults.

I think we have had enough here. This thread is bouncing all over the place, all of it surrounding a forbidden board topic.... which IS in effect in here.


Quote:
#10 - Topics regarding children, and certain images depicting children are not material for an adult-themed board. You must be at least 18 years of age to register and participate here, and along those lines, our subject matter is to surround individuals of the proper age range. Any mention or reference to underage sex is strictly forbidden and may result in loss of your posting privileges.

These discussions will be very lightly moderated.
You all know the big forbidden topics such as underage sex, illicit drugs, bestiality, revealing personal info, medical speculation, or images not in compliance will not be tolerated.

I still think the thread should not have been closed. It was more about current events than the forbidden subjects. And I think CC didn't follow the "thick skin" measure of the Sandbox Forum.