I think the OP didn't have a problem with guys who don't post reviews, he had a problem with guys that don't write reviews but post endlessly in a negative manner about anything and everything. On this point I agree with him. Originally Posted by slowmoverexactly.
Why I haven't reviewed since the old board is my business. If that makes me a toll in your eyes, so be it. I'm not here for male bonding or approval. Originally Posted by IaintlieinYou might want reread what I wrote in the original post. But, if you post a bunch of negative things, troll other's posts and condescend to those who do not have your opinion, then the shoe fits for you, if not, then it doesn't.
As to the "troll" tag, sure whatever but I think it's only fair to have another tag for those that actually think they've become some kind of ECCIE overlord who's opinion matters so much that they feel compelled to interject their opinion into every little topic or issue. Originally Posted by RAMPThere is nothing wrong with people giving their opinion, after all, this is an opinionated website, but the overlords you are talking about are the ones who tell others who differ on their opinions on hobby related subjects are wrong and call them names. That goes for all members, not just the guys.
I have met guys on here that does not review and they are wonderful people. They gave me everything I asked for my screening process with a question and never negotiated my rates either. It's great to have reviewed clients too don't get me wrong it helps with the screening process much easier. Originally Posted by SexyPlatinumMost guys are great people (in person), which is why many separate their Eccie and p411 handles.
I represent the exception group Dave. I go back to aspd, and Ive hobbied in phases over the years (you know, the old low-volume hobbyist joke).Good for you. I brought it up because no one else has. Is there another idea that would better notate those types of members?
There are a lot of different types of people here, with different goals, lifestyles, and practices. The value, or lack, of the non-reviewing member has been greatly discussed; I've given a lengthy, unapologetic comment on it in past years.
* But I'm with you on the guys who do little but come on to shitass all over other people's posts...negativity, bs, trolling, what you're talking about. I imagine most are scrawny, lonely, keyboard warriors, who need to dump their shit somewhere, and where better than here where there's no accountability behind their monitors/devices.
I'm sure you know all of this already, so outside of the 'Troll' idea, why do you bring it up?
Happy Halloween Peeps!!
LnH Originally Posted by LoveNHorny
Well I'll add my two cents lol. I've never been negative on here but I only hobby when I travel. Usually 2times a year and it's usually in Texas. Sometimes I dont have time to see a provider so no chance to review. Anyway since I don't come on very often should I be labled as a troll? The Times I'm on I am not negative.I know what he means -.-'
The possibility to unfairly label is very high .
Ps I hear what u are saying lol Originally Posted by maxgame2
I have met guys on here that does not review and they are wonderful people. They gave me everything I asked for my screening process with a question and never negotiated my rates either. It's great to have reviewed clients too don't get me wrong it helps with the screening process much easier. Originally Posted by SexyPlatinumI want you to touch me again soon... Js you will get round two you sexy gem
Why I haven't reviewed since the old board is my business. If that makes me a toll in your eyes, so be it. I'm not here for male bonding or approval.No, but do you only post negative hassle on every post you do? Do you have anything positive to say to anyone? When people see you post, do they need to put (view post) because you are blocked?
Just an idea, but maybe those who actually "troll" should be the one's labeled as "troll"s? I see a current thread today being trolled by a member who does have credited reviews. Originally Posted by Iaintliein
I think the OP didn't have a problem with guys who don't post reviews, he had a problem with guys that don't write reviews but post endlessly in a negative manner about anything and everything. On this point I agree with him. Originally Posted by slowmoverBingo
I myself have been outted and can no longer post reviews....was actually thinking of seeking advice on how to swing another handle so I can keep on! Originally Posted by nicholas linnear
1) some providers are review adverseHe's right
2) I am put off by some reviews that instead of providing an executive summary write up, appear to be reaching for "Dear Penthouse Forum" entertainment length and detail (WALDT)
3) I only review when seeing a "new to me" provider..... Repeat reviews of my regular friends seems to be kinda like cheating, as I am adding nothing new to the forum....IMHO
4) I prefer to pay for access so that I am able to come/leave as I please Originally Posted by Roothead