Someone (who I think is an African American female) claimed to have done research for a "thesis" on the issue of race in BP/CL sex trade ads:
http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-04-04/...-about-racism/
I find the way certain providers frame their profiles particularly offensive. Perhaps it is just me, perhaps it is just their absence of good sense or perhaps it is a deliberate desire to provoke and offend. The last says a lot about a person's character. Should there be any guidelines in ECCIE on what is considered less desirable in a profile? This is not censorship but a suggestion on what is felt to be the community standard, within very broad limits? I read a provider profile today that struck me as extremely discourteous and deliberately so; this person has no place being here and should take her attitudes elsewhere. Originally Posted by greenpeace2014your kidding right
I have had some discussions with an AA provider who sometimes travels with a blond Caucasion provider friend of hers. She says that her friend gets many more calls than her, even though my AA friend advertises more systematically and is much more highly reviewed than her friend. So there seems to be a higher demand for Caucasians, especially blonds. This, however, does not, in itself, mean that racism is involved. It probably has more to do with preferences. (I have a strong preference for AA women, but I don't hate Caucasian women.) There are probably many hobbyists who are racist, and this may have some influence on their preferences, but I do not see a clear, consistent, logical link between racisim and sexual preferences. Originally Posted by brasil
I have had some discussions with an AA provider who sometimes travels with a blond Caucasion provider friend of hers. She says that her friend gets many more calls than her, even though my AA friend advertises more systematically and is much more highly reviewed than her friend.
. Originally Posted by brasil
higher than 6% true I think not sure.Take time and look at Backpage country side. They are competing against that also.
50% no way. But guessing from what I see here on eccie only Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
your kidding rightI am not talking about racism but offensive language, unwarranted rudeness. A provider has the right to refuse people of color or whoever she chooses. But quite recently I saw an ad that rubbed me the wrong way. It spoke of very poor breeding, and a person void of basic good manners, in short, not a lady. In British maritime history, there was a particularly cruel yet hallowed tradition reserved for such as these.
every guy and gal has the right to try to do the do with who ever they want for any reason. Or take a pass on for the same reason. Attitude could be one to do or not to do.
Taint it it great we humans come in many shapes, sizes, colors, etc. etc. etc., and attitudes. Originally Posted by offshoredrilling