The 9th Circuit Court US Court of Appeals ruled that Escort services have no constitutionally protected under the court case listed below. The justices said that escort service does not offer a specific speech so it does not qualify for First Amendment Protection. The second disputed issue before the courts was whether or not escort services qualify for intimate relationship protection.
The justices said that escort service does not qualify for intimate association protection because the business practices does not qualify as intimate relationship. Please read the court case to find out why.
Since escort service does not have constitutional protection, police are allowed to sting without a warrant from a court. They do not have to have probable cause that a crime has occurred to set up a sting.
Since it is pure commercial, the government can come in anytime they wish. Just like a health inspector coming to a restaurant to randomly inspection the kitchen without a warrant.
IDK, INC., a Nevada corporation; Showgirls of Las Vegas,
Inc., a Nevada corporation; Golden Girls, a
Nevada Corporation; Playgirls, a sole
proprietorship; et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF CLARK; Thalia M. Dondero, Manuel J. Cortez, Karen
Hayes, Paul May, R.J. "Dick" Ronzone, Donald M. Clark and
Bruce L. Woodbury, in their capacity as members of the Clark
County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov...85.85-1877.htm
Don’t forget to check out my theoretical, first and fourteenth amendment synthetic escort services at http://courtesanjoel.com/. Not an advertisement. Just a class project for a community college. Not taking any clients. Just for educational or entertaiment purpose.
Courtesan Joel
- enolahappy2012
- 12-08-2012, 08:12 PM
- Sidewinder
- 12-09-2012, 11:43 AM
404 Not Found
- jframe2
- 12-10-2012, 04:57 AM
ThreAD!
- sky_wire
- 12-10-2012, 03:05 PM
http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/...6/1185/419829/
This is a 1988 decision, and it's an appeal from a summary judgment. It's not an appeal from a trial on the merits. Big difference.
I miss SJ......
This is a 1988 decision, and it's an appeal from a summary judgment. It's not an appeal from a trial on the merits. Big difference.
I miss SJ......