Up to this point, both Reagan and Bush 1 AND 2 have acted more like 'kings' than Obama, going by the numbers. The problem is you don't care how many executive orders are issued as long as you agree with the order and the president is of your party. The shoe always sucks when it's on the other foot...
http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/e...-in-one-chart/
Originally Posted by WombRaider
so your argument here is that since Obama signed less overall EO's than Reagan and Bush 1 and 2 he's less imperial? hmm. interesting point of view. but not surprising from someone who has his head up his ass.
it's not how many EO's you fool it's what those EO's mean and attempt to do.
and who by the way signed by far the most EO's?
why .. FDR of course that effete socialist big government snob that he was.