https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/30/us/da...ean/index.html
wow.. details must be interesting.
IIRC, only 3 U.S. Police Officers in the past Dozen years or so, have been charged with murder while on duty.. 2 of them this year in North Texas.
Sad situation all around.I think most people will be surprised, if not shocked at a murder indictment. I think it is clear that Guyger's account does not gel with the evidence.. I'm interested to see the details, what the Grand Jury found that contradicted Amber.
When you shoot an unarmed Man in his Apartment (Amber in wrong Apartment) it is hard to see it going in any other direction. Originally Posted by MRMR
A Dallas officer muders an innocent man in his home in cold blood. Wtf Dallas...who do you hire to protect n serve your stupid city? Dallas sucks. Butt they have their vice squad lol Originally Posted by Tsmokieswait a sec.. the Grand Jury is recommending that the DA charge Amber with murder.. if she is, another jury needs to find her guilty of murder.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/30/us/da...ean/index.htmlShe was not on duty.
wow.. details must be interesting.
IIRC, only 3 U.S. Police Officers in the past Dozen years or so, have been charged with murder while on duty.. 2 of them this year in North Texas. Originally Posted by Chung Tran
I was not one of those people that thought she’d be exonerated. She did everything wrong. Nothing about the shooting, or circumstances surrounding the following days gelled. A murder charge is appropriate. Originally Posted by Ronin3true, there are a lot of weird things, weak explanation, stuff not matching up. but beyond that.. why did she kill him? I think the Grand Jury has some kind of motive in mind that we, the Public, does not know.. I don't think they would press a murder charge otherwise. the one thing Amber has going for her, if you can call it that, is the fact that her apartment was directly below his.. of course, that could be a liability if she was bothered by noise coming from his place.. all "evidence" suggests noise was not a factor that night, since she was arriving home from work.
I'm surprised.I totally agree. A murder conviction requires that she knowingly and willingly committed a crime. They better have hard evidence. If they don’t she will walk. Manslaughter or negligent homicide would have been easier to prove
I think B Three is not: https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2420390&page=6
She thinks this might be her best chance at emerging from criminal court without a conviction. Originally Posted by Crock