Thug who shot Ferguson Officers Caught.!

Turns out he was a local thug trying to shoot some fellow demonstrators, or so he says. I guess him being a bad shot was unlucky for the two wounded Officers.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015...-shooter-case/

What kind of animal just sprays bullets into a crowd? The same kind of animals that tore the entire city apart in a looting rampage.

Fukin' animals.
Turns out he was a local thug trying to shoot some fellow demonstrators, or so he says. I guess him being a bad shot was unlucky for the two wounded Officers.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015...-shooter-case/

What kind of animal just sprays bullets into a crowd? The same kind of animals that tore the entire city apart in a looting rampage.

Fukin' animals. Originally Posted by Jackie S
You get your news from the blaze. Somehow I knew that.

Your new name is snowball
You get your news from the blaze. Somehow I knew that.

Your new name is snowball Originally Posted by UnderConstruction


http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.2149978

I won't post all of the other networks carrying the same story. It's all over the Net.

I try to have civil conversations with other posters without resorting to juvenile name calling. If you are going to talk to me, either follow that lead, or put me on ignore.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
and jesse jackass and Al sharlaton have .. NO COMMENT.

at least Holder called these bums "damn punks" .. but let's not read too much into that eh? politics demanded he say something "politically correct" so he did.

i'm waiting for Obammy to say .. "if i had a son .. he'd be like this cop shooting ahole .."

America is waiting mr Manchurian Candidate ...

and jesse jackass and Al sharlaton have .. NO COMMENT.

at least Holder called these bums "damn punks" .. but let's not read too much into that eh? politics demanded he say something "politically correct" so he did.

i'm waiting for Obammy to say .. "if i had a son .. he'd be like this cop shooting ahole .."

America is waiting mr Manchurian Candidate ...

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Your family pic wacco?
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
What we've been told is that two shots were fired and two shots hit targets. Now he says that he was only shooting at people and not cops. Of course, shooting at cops gets you some heavy time in prison (if you make it to prison) but shooting just people can be plea bargained down to simple assault.

BULLSHIT! If I believe anything this jerk's lawyer has to say. Cops were shot in the performance of the their duties (he can't claim self defense) and he should go down for trying to KILL two cops.
LexusLover's Avatar
Of course, shooting at cops gets you some heavy time in prison (if you make it to prison) but shooting just people can be plea bargained down to simple assault. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
When it was Officer Wilson I thought it was appropriate to withhold judgment as to the "intent" of Officer Wilson and his "knowledge" of the person who was killed, and I believe that withholding of judgment is appropriate with this person.

First, since he (or someone on his behalf) is asserting he was trying to shoot "someone else" in the crowd of protesters, then he should be able to describe who that person or those persons are and where they were standing at the time of the shooting. Then it can be determined if he were targeting a person he knows or knew in the crowd, or just one certain "type" of person.

BTW: Using a firearm in an assault is not "simple assault" whether he was shooting at a police officer or someone else. His intent was to use a firearm.
What we've been told is that two shots were fired and two shots hit targets. Now he says that he was only shooting at people and not cops. Of course, shooting at cops gets you some heavy time in prison (if you make it to prison) but shooting just people can be plea bargained down to simple assault.

BULLSHIT! If I believe anything this jerk's lawyer has to say. Cops were shot in the performance of the their duties (he can't claim self defense) and he should go down for trying to KILL two cops. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
The king has spoken! It shall be so!
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
What we've been told is that two shots were fired and two shots hit targets. Now he says that he was only shooting at people and not cops. Of course, shooting at cops gets you some heavy time in prison (if you make it to prison) but shooting just people can be plea bargained down to simple assault.

BULLSHIT! If I believe anything this jerk's lawyer has to say. Cops were shot in the performance of the their duties (he can't claim self defense) and he should go down for trying to KILL two cops. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
the primary charge here should be Attempted Murder, first degree. Doesn't really matter if it was a cop he was shooting at or not, except that since the cops were on duty i'm sure a few more charges in that regard can and will be filed. shouldn't really matter how his Lawyer tries to spin doctor it.

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Your family pic wacco? Originally Posted by i'va biggen


no. yours, you want to play that left or right game again? didn't work out too well last time.

you are the one on the LEFT. as usual.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Explain how that isn't just blatant racism, waKKKo KKKid.

Or why you feel it's important that you denigrate this board with your ignorant redneckedness!

Hillbilly fuck.
LexusLover's Avatar
the primary charge here should be Attempted Murder, first degree. Doesn't really matter if it was a cop he was shooting at or not, except that since the cops were on duty i'm sure a few more charges in that regard can and will be filed. shouldn't really matter how his Lawyer tries to spin doctor it.

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Actually in Missouri the appropriate charge ought to be First Degree Assault, which is punished as a Class A Felony and can carry a life sentence. From a prosecutorial point of view there is no reason to charge "attempted murder," since it requires the State to prove an "intent to kill" which merely increases the burden on the State without any additional punishment/time.

It sounds better in the media, but over indicting/charging can get blow black from a jury when the State/Government fails to meet their burden of "intent to kill."

Either one in Missouri will be a Class A Felony, so the punishment range is the same, and the judge can assess a life sentence ... especially for two deadly weapon assaults ... on police officers who are considered in Missouri (as most Model Penal Code states) as a "special class" of victim. In Texas police officers are lumped in with "public servants" as a "special class" of victims, and aggravated assault on a peace officer (public servant) is a 1st degree felony in Texas as well.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...ampaign=buffer

This is unbelievable. At least the MSNBC host didn't just let him ramble one with this shit without challenging him.

But how many Obama and potential Hillary Voters will believe this crap even when it is a total falsehood.

Just like "hands up"


no. yours, you want to play that left or right game again? didn't work out too well last time.

you are the one on the LEFT. as usual.
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
LMAO you standing behind the family pic wacco? I will play left and right games all day with your dumb ass. You failed the first time. Or are you the bitch in the middle?
LexusLover's Avatar
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...ampaign=buffer

This is unbelievable. At least the MSNBC host didn't just let him ramble one with this shit without challenging him.

But how many Obama and potential Hillary Voters will believe this crap even when it is a total falsehood.

Just like "hands up" Originally Posted by Jackie S
Everyone of them who still admits to voting for them.