Knowing what we know now, would Obama and Hillary have still abandoned Iraq like they did?

A good question don't you think? Unlike the gotcha question used against Jeb Bush, it is a legitimate question for the very people (one who is running for president) who are responsible for the abandonment of Iraq and the rise of ISIS. Lets us not forget the only person running for president now who voted FOR the war in Iraq.

I also noticed that Tampon did lie on his similar post. Bush was answering a question about what he would have done back in 2003 if everything were the same. Yep, he flubbed the question because they had been asking the other question incessantly until they changed it from what we knew then to what we know now. A real gotcha question. The kind of question Tampon would love.

Keep in mind, you are dealing with a unique combination of Stupidity and Naiveté in an Administration that still thinks that you can reason with Religious Fanatics who are serving out a mandate from their "God" to either convert or kill all of those who do not follow their particular version of Islam.

After all, didn't Hillary say "they just need jobs".

After all, didn't Hillary say "they just need jobs". Originally Posted by Jackie S

A good question don't you think? Unlike the gotcha question used against Jeb Bush, it is a legitimate question for the very people (one who is running for president) who are responsible for the abandonment of Iraq and the rise of ISIS. Lets us not forget the only person running for president now who voted FOR the war in Iraq.

I also noticed that Tampon did lie on his similar post. Bush was answering a question about what he would have done back in 2003 if everything were the same. Yep, he flubbed the question because they had been asking the other question incessantly until they changed it from what we knew then to what we know now. A real gotcha question. The kind of question Tampon would love. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Is a gotcha question just one that republican wannabees stumble over? Seems like Jeb isn't the only one, and the question comes from Fox.

I'm still upset that they let that Dum-bama be president. Everyone knows that his kind of people do not have the testicles or above the neck ability to run anything. Let alone a country unless it is into the ground. We are seeing that now.

Keep in mind, you are dealing with a unique combination of Stupidity and Naiveté in an Administration that still thinks that you can reason with Religious Fanatics who are serving out a mandate from their "God" to either convert or kill all of those who do not follow their particular version of Islam.

After all, didn't Hillary say "they just need jobs". Originally Posted by Jackie S

You're also naive if you think that the economic situation plays no part in it. People who are happy in their work and their lives don't go around blowing people up, for the most part. Christianity commands the same of non-believers. You don't see Christians, for the most part, going around blowing people up. Islam has not had the enlightenment period that Christianity has. Islam is in the 1400s.

I'm still upset that they let that Dum-bama be president. Everyone knows that his kind of people do not have the testicles or above the neck ability to run anything. Let alone a country unless it is into the ground. We are seeing that now. Originally Posted by D.G.

Do you have a degree from Harvard you would like to share with the rest of us? You don't have the 'above the neck' ability, as you put it, to construct a complete sentence.

A good question don't you think? Unlike the gotcha question used against Jeb Bush, it is a legitimate question for the very people (one who is running for president) who are responsible for the abandonment of Iraq and the rise of ISIS. Lets us not forget the only person running for president now who voted FOR the war in Iraq.

I also noticed that Tampon did lie on his similar post. Bush was answering a question about what he would have done back in 2003 if everything were the same. Yep, he flubbed the question because they had been asking the other question incessantly until they changed it from what we knew then to what we know now. A real gotcha question. The kind of question Tampon would love. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It's only legitimate if you have a time machine. No, I don't think it's a good question.

I'm still upset that they let that Dum-bama be president. Everyone knows that his kind of people do not have the testicles or above the neck ability to run anything. Let alone a country unless it is into the ground. We are seeing that now. Originally Posted by D.G.

I wonder what you mean by "his kind of people"? Do you mean community organizers? I would agree. Do you mean incompetent lawyers? I would agree. Do you mean liberal progressives? I would agree. I'm not sure what else you mean since I think Herman Cain, Condi Rice, and even Ben Carson would do a much better job.

You're also naive if you think that the economic situation plays no part in it. People who are happy in their work and their lives don't go around blowing people up, for the most part. Christianity commands the same of non-believers. You don't see Christians, for the most part, going around blowing people up. Islam has not had the enlightenment period that Christianity has. Islam is in the 1400s. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You know I don't understand why you keep throwing that out there. Islam has not had the enlightment like Christianity has. Is it written somewhere that an enlightenment is going to happen at all? Or does that excuse what they're doing? They're going to kill us all but don't worry, someday they will be enlightened and they will feel real bad about what they did. You can stop throwing out lame excuses because that is how it comes across.

I'm still upset that they let that Dum-bama be president. Everyone knows that his kind of people do not have the testicles or above the neck ability to run anything. Let alone a country unless it is into the ground. We are seeing that now. Originally Posted by D.G.

Who is "they?"

Did you vote?

Are you registered?

It's only legitimate if you have a time machine. No, I don't think it's a good question. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Really? Don't you recall when they asked Bush if he had made any mistakes or had any regrets about his time in office? Do you think that was fair?

I wonder what you mean by "his kind of people"? Do you mean community organizers? I would agree. Do you mean incompetent lawyers? I would agree. Do you mean liberal progressives? I would agree. I'm not sure what else you mean since I think Herman Cain, Condi Rice, and even Ben Carson would do a much better job. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

He means the same thing YOU mean in every fucking thread you post, JDIdiot. And BTW, I'm sure this dude (?) is a perfect candidate for your Idiot Jihad!

NEEEEGROES!

Really? Don't you recall when they asked Bush if he had made any mistakes or had any regrets about his time in office? Do you think that was fair? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

The question was fair. The answer, "what is an ironing board," was what bothered me.

Who is "they?"

Did you vote?

Are you registered?

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yes I vote. And the first time I did so we got rid of that peanut boy Carter.

You know I don't understand why you keep throwing that out there. Islam has not had the enlightenment like Christianity has. Is it written somewhere that an enlightenment is going to happen at all? Or does that excuse what they're doing? They're going to kill us all but don't worry, someday they will be enlightened and they will feel real bad about what they did. You can stop throwing out lame excuses because that is how it comes across. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

+1

Undercunt only knows superficial talking points. He can't even define the Enlightenment, let alone explain its significance in the history of Western thought or its relevance/irrelevance to modern Islam.